Many developers use Promises daily… but few clearly understand the difference between these three: - `Promise.all()` - `Promise.allSettled()` - `Promise.race()` They look similar - but their behavior is completely different. Here’s the simple way to remember them 1️⃣ `Promise.all()` Runs promises in parallel and waits for all of them to succeed. If one fails everything fails immediately. ``` await Promise.all([p1, p2, p3]) ``` Use when every result is required Example: loading user profile, posts, and followers. 2️⃣ `Promise.allSettled()` Waits for all promises to finish, whether they succeed or fail. ``` await Promise.allSettled([p1, p2, p3]) ``` Result looks like: ``` [ {status: "fulfilled", value: ...}, {status: "rejected", reason: ...} ] ``` Use when you want all results, even if some fail. Perfect for dashboards or batch operations. 3️⃣ `Promise.race()` Returns the first promise that settles (resolve OR reject). ``` await Promise.race([p1, p2, p3]) ``` Commonly used for timeouts. Example: API request vs timeout timer. Easy way to remember `Promise.all` - All must succeed `Promise.allSettled` - Give me every result `Promise.race` -Whoever finishes first wins Mastering these small patterns can significantly improve performance and reliability in async JavaScript. Most developers learn Promises… But strong engineers learn how to orchestrate them. #javascript #webdevelopment #softwareengineering #frontend #nodejs
Mastering Promise Patterns in JavaScript: all, allSettled, and race
More Relevant Posts
-
⚡ Mastering Async/Await in Node.js – Write Cleaner, Smarter CodeTired of callback hell? 😵 Nested .then() chains confusing your logic?👉 Async/Await is the game-changer you need.🧠 What is Async/Await? It’s a modern way to handle asynchronous operations in JavaScript, built on top of Promises.async → makes a function return a Promiseawait → pauses execution until the Promise resolves🔧 Before (Promises):getUser() .then(user => getOrders(user.id)) .then(orders => console.log(orders)) .catch(err => console.error(err));✨ After (Async/Await):async function fetchOrders() { try { const user = await getUser(); const orders = await getOrders(user.id); console.log(orders); } catch (err) { console.error(err); } }💡 Why Developers Love It:Cleaner & more readable code 🧹Easier error handling with try/catchLooks like synchronous code, but runs async ⚡Reduces bugs in complex workflows🚀 Pro Tips:Use Promise.all() for parallel executionAvoid blocking loops with await inside for (use wisely)Always handle errors ❗🔥 Real-World Use Cases:API calls 🌐Database queries 🗄️File handling 📂Background jobs ⏳💬 One Line Summary: Async/Await turns messy async code into clean, readable logic.#NodeJS #JavaScript #AsyncAwait #CleanCode #WebDevelopment #BackendDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
day-22 |💡 “Problem is the Mother of New Technology.” While studying the history of software development, I noticed a simple pattern: Every major technology was created to solve a problem that developers faced earlier. The evolution of development is not about trends. It’s about solving limitations. Here’s a short view of how development technologies evolved. 🌐 Static Web (HTML) Why it existed: To publish information on the internet. Why we shifted: Websites were static — no interaction, no user data. ⚙️ Dynamic Web (PHP, ASP, Java + Databases) Why it existed: To process user input and generate dynamic pages. Why we shifted: Code became messy and difficult to maintain as applications grew. 🧩 Framework Era (Django, Rails, Laravel, Spring) Why it existed: To provide structure, reusable components, and faster development. Why we shifted: Traditional server-rendered apps struggled with highly interactive user experiences. ⚡ Modern Frontend Era (React, Angular, Vue) Why it existed: To build fast, interactive user interfaces with component-based architecture. Why we shifted: Deployment, scaling, and infrastructure management became complex. ☁️ Cloud & DevOps Era (Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD) Why it existed: To automate deployments and scale applications reliably. Why we shifted: Infrastructure complexity increased and required better abstraction. 🤖 AI-Assisted Development Why it exists: To help developers write, debug, and understand code faster. 🧠 The Pattern Behind Every Technology Shift Problem → Innovation → Adoption → New Problems → Next Innovation That’s why great developers focus less on chasing tools and more on understanding the problems those tools solve. Because technologies will change. But problem-solving will always remain the core of engineering. #SoftwareDevelopment #Programming #DeveloperMindset #TechEvolution #DevJourney #Techhackontime999
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🏍️(Day-23) Built a Full-Stack Authentication System with JSON Server! Just completed a mini project that implements a complete user authentication flow using vanilla JavaScript and JSON Server — no frameworks, just pure fundamentals. What it does: 🔐 Sign Up Flow — A dynamic registration form appears on demand. Users enter their credentials, which are validated and stored directly into a local JSON database via a POST request to JSON Server. ✅ Login Flow — On login, the app fetches all stored user records via a GET request, then maps through the data to match the entered username and password. If credentials match, the user is redirected to the main page. If not, an alert notifies them. Key concepts I practiced: ⚡ Dynamic DOM manipulation — creating and removing elements on the fly with createElement, innerHTML, and remove() ⚡ Async/Await with Fetch API — handling real HTTP requests (GET & POST) to a local REST API ⚡ JSON Server — simulating a real backend database with zero setup ⚡ Event-driven architecture — attaching and managing multiple event listeners dynamically ⚡ State management — using boolean flags to toggle UI states without any framework Tech Stack: HTML · CSS · Vanilla JavaScript · JSON Server · REST API · Fetch API This project taught me how real authentication systems think — store, fetch, compare. The logic is simple but the concepts are production-level fundamentals every developer needs. 🔗 Building the frontend to backend bridge, one fetch at a time. 🚀 #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #Frontend #VanillaJS #RESTAPI #FetchAPI #JSONServer #Authentication #100DaysOfCode #WebDev #Programming #Coding #BuildInPublic #TechLearning #NodeJS #OpenToWork #LinkedInTech #DeveloperJourney #FrontendDevelopment #FullStack
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💻 Essential Tools Every Web Engineer Should Know Whether you’re building the user interface or powering the server, having the right tools can make all the difference. Here’s a concise guide by category: 1️⃣ Front-End Engineer Tools Core: HTML, CSS, JavaScript, TypeScript Frameworks & Libraries: React, Vue, Angular, Svelte State Management: Redux, Zustand, MobX UI & Styling: Tailwind CSS, Material-UI, Bootstrap, Sass Build & Bundling: Webpack, Vite, Babel Testing & Debugging: Jest, Cypress, Chrome DevTools Collaboration & Design Handoff: Figma, Zeplin, Adobe XD 2️⃣ Back-End Engineer Tools Languages: Node.js, Python, Java, C#, Go, Ruby Frameworks: Express.js, Django, Flask, Spring Boot, Ruby on Rails API Development: REST, GraphQL, gRPC, Postman, Swagger Testing & Monitoring: PyTest, JUnit, Sentry, Prometheus, Grafana Deployment & DevOps: Docker, Kubernetes, Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Nginx 3️⃣ Database Tools Relational DBs: MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server NoSQL DBs: MongoDB, Redis, Cassandra In-memory DBs: Redis, Memcached Query & Management: pgAdmin, MongoDB Compass, DBeaver 💡 Pro Tip: A great engineer isn’t just about knowing one tool—they master the right stack for the project and collaborate efficiently. 🔥 Question for You: Which tools can’t you live without in your workflow? #WebDevelopment #Frontend #Backend #FullStack #Database #DevTools #Coding #SoftwareEngineering #TechTips #Programming #Collaboration #DevOps #APIs
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚡ 𝗡𝗢𝗗𝗘.𝗝𝗦 · 𝗔𝗦𝗬𝗡𝗖 Most 𝗡𝗼𝗱𝗲.𝗷𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝘀𝘆𝗻𝗰 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴. And the performance loss is bigger than most people realize. Here’s the mistake I see 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 in backend codebases: 𝚏𝚘𝚛 (𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝 𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚏 𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚜) { 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚒𝚝 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚍𝙴𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚕(𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛); // 𝚂𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 ❌ } At first glance it looks fine. But this code sends emails 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗯𝘆 𝗼𝗻𝗲. Which means 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵. In production systems, this can 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝗽𝘂𝘁. --- ### 🚀 The Fix Run independent async operations 𝗶𝗻 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗹: ` 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚒𝚝 𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚎.𝚊𝚕𝚕(𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚜.𝚖𝚊𝚙(𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛 => 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚍𝙴𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚕(𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛))); // 𝙿𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚕 𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 ✅ Now Node.js processes them 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆, dramatically improving performance. --- ### ⚠️ Other Async Killers I See in Production ❌ 𝗨𝗻𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 → Silent crashes or unstable services ❌ 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗿𝘆/𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝘀𝘆𝗻𝗰 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 → Errors escape and break request flows ❌ 𝗕𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝘆𝗻𝗰 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 → CPU-heavy tasks freeze your API --- ### 📈 The Impact Sometimes a 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝘀𝘆𝗻𝗰 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 can: ✅ Increase throughput 𝟭𝟬𝘅 ✅ Reduce API latency dramatically ✅ Improve scalability 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 --- 💡 𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆 Before scaling servers… 𝗼𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝘀𝘆𝗻𝗰 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗿𝘂𝗻𝘀. Node.js performance often comes down to 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽. --- 🔄 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀: What’s the 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝗼𝗱𝗲.𝗷𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲 you've found in production? #NodeJS #BackendEngineering #AsyncProgramming #JavaScript #SoftwareEngineering #ScalableSystems
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I built a framework for Node.js/TypeScript, and it was worth every second it took building it. It’s called Devux.js ⚡️, and here’s the story. I was tired of writing the same code over and over again. Instead of focusing on business logic, I was setting up the same boilerplate for every feature. It was distracting, error-prone, and time-consuming. Everything felt scattered: - No boundaries between layers - Services mixed with routing and database logic - Testing was a nightmare - No conventions, no structure - Manual typing and syncing between frontend and backend - Writing API clients by hand - Fear of forgetting steps I needed a system. So I built Devux.js ⚡️. Devux.js is a Node.js/TypeScript framework built for developer productivity: → Interactive CLI for code generation - zero boilerplate → Clean architecture built-in → Auto-generated type-safe API client + OpenAPI spec → Powerful testing - every layer is testable in isolation with fully type-safe mocking → Zero manual typing and syncing - define schema once, get everything → Managed request lifecycle, dependency injection, context propagation, automated database transactions And many other features! It's functional and solves common serious problems. 🚀 Documentation and examples are growing. Docs: https://devuxjs.com GitHub: https://lnkd.in/dX6szHXe More posts coming soon - covering features, patterns, tools, and video tutorials. 💡Contributions are more than welcome! Have you built similar tools? What problems did you solve? #TypeScript #NodeJS
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Ever wondered what actually happens when you run a Node.js application? Most developers use Node.js daily for APIs and backend services, but the real magic happens behind the scenes. Let’s break it down using the architecture shown in this diagram 👇 🔹 1️⃣ Application Layer This is where we write our JavaScript code — building APIs, handling routes, and defining business logic. 🔹 2️⃣ V8 JavaScript Engine Node.js uses Google’s V8 Engine to convert JavaScript code into machine code so the system can execute it quickly. 🔹 3️⃣ Node.js Bindings (Node APIs) These bindings act like a bridge between JavaScript and the operating system, allowing Node.js to perform tasks like file handling, networking, and process management. 🔹 4️⃣ Libuv – The Asynchronous Engine Libuv is the core library that powers Node.js asynchronous behavior. It manages the event loop and enables non-blocking I/O operations. 🔹 5️⃣ Event Queue & Event Loop When tasks like file reading, API calls, or database queries are triggered, they are placed in the event queue. The event loop continuously checks the queue and executes callbacks when the main thread becomes free. 🔹 6️⃣ Worker Threads If a blocking operation occurs (like file system operations or heavy tasks), libuv sends it to worker threads in the thread pool. Once the work is done, the callback returns to the event loop and the response is sent back to the application. 💡 Why is Node.js so powerful? Because it follows an event-driven, non-blocking architecture, allowing it to handle thousands of concurrent requests with a single thread. That’s why Node.js is widely used for: • REST APIs • Real-time applications (chat apps) • Streaming services • Microservices architectures 📌 Learning Node.js becomes much easier when you understand how the Event Loop + Libuv + V8 Engine work together. #NodeJS #BackendDevelopment #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Silent performance killers often hide in plain sight. We recently diagnosed a critical issue where nearly 20% of our production bundle size was comprised of 'ghost' code – unused imports and dead exports bloating our Next.js application. This wasn't just an aesthetic concern; it directly translated to slower page load times, increased data transfer costs, and a larger memory footprint for clients. The root cause was simple developer oversight compounded by lack of guardrails. Our fix involved a two-pronged approach. First, we strictly enforced ESLint's `no-unused-vars` rule to `error` level across our MERN stack. This catches unused imports at commit or CI/CD, preventing them from ever reaching production. Second, we verified and optimized our build configuration to fully leverage tree-shaking. Modern bundlers like Webpack and Vite, especially within Next.js 15, are powerful, but they require proper setup for dead code elimination to be truly effective. Ensuring `package.json` `sideEffects` property is correctly configured and modules are written with ES Modules syntax is crucial. The result? A significant reduction in bundle size, noticeable improvements in application performance, and a streamlined developer workflow. This isn't about chasing micro-optimizations; it's about foundational engineering hygiene that directly impacts user experience and operational costs. Proactive code quality, enforced by automation, pays dividends far beyond the initial setup effort. #SoftwareEngineering #WebDevelopment #PerformanceOptimization #FrontendDevelopment #BackendDevelopment #Nextjs #Nodejs #MERNStack #ESLint #TreeShaking #Webpack #Vite #CodeQuality #DeveloperTools #TechLeadership #CTO #Founders #Scalability #EngineeringCulture #DevOps #Automation #AIAutomation #SoftwareArchitecture #TechStrategy #DigitalTransformation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I promised — and I delivered. Here's usePromise: a custom React hook I built that I genuinely believe should be in every developer's project from day one. Let me explain why. The problem nobody talks about openly: Every React developer has written this exact block of code hundreds of times mentioned in the image 👇 It works. It's familiar. And it's been silently violating the DRY principle across every codebase you've ever touched. usePromise replaces all of that with a single hook that handles: ✅ Loading, data, and error state — managed via useReducer to prevent async race conditions ✅ Real request cancellation via AbortController (not just ignoring the response — actually aborting the request) ✅ Data transformation at the configuration level with dataMapper ✅ Lifecycle callbacks — onSuccess, onError, onComplete, and isRequestAbortionComplete ✅ executeOnMount support — fire on render without a single useEffect in your component ✅ Full reset capability — return to initial state cleanly Why not just React Query? React Query is excellent for caching, deduplication, and large-scale data orchestration. But sometimes you want something you fully own — no black boxes, no magic, no dependency debates in code review. usePromise gives you that. It's a foundation you understand end-to-end and can extend however you need. Why should this be standard? SOLID principles tell us: don't repeat yourself. Async data fetching is the most repeated pattern in every React application in existence. The framework gives us the primitives — useReducer, useCallback, useEffect — but leaves the wiring entirely to us. Every team solves this problem. Most teams solve it inconsistently. This hook is the consistent answer. Three years in, and the thing I keep coming back to is this: the first few years of your career build the developer you'll be. The habits, the patterns, the defaults you reach for. Reach for clean ones. Full deep-dive article on Medium including the complete implementation, the Promise lifecycle explained from first principles, and an honest breakdown of trade-offs. This is the medium article for more clarity down below 👇 https://lnkd.in/gJWZhQXk #React #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #Frontend #OpenSource #ReactHooks #CleanCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most developers use async/await. Fewer understand what’s actually happening under the hood. async/await didn’t change how JavaScript handles asynchronous code. It just made it easier to read. Under the hood: - Every async function returns a Promise - Every await pauses execution of that function - Control goes back to the call stack — nothing is blocked No magic. Just Promises + the Event Loop. Here’s what actually happens: async function getData() { const data = await fetchSomething(); console.log(data); } → getData() is called An execution context is pushed onto the call stack → await is hit 🟡 fetchSomething() runs Execution of getData() pauses (non-blocking) → Call stack is free JavaScript continues handling other work → Promise resolves ✅ Its continuation is pushed to the Microtask Queue → Event Loop checks 🔄 Call stack empty → process Microtasks first → Execution resumes 🟢 getData() continues from where it paused console.log(data) runs → Function completes Call stack is clear again This is why microtasks run before setTimeout. After the call stack is empty, the Event Loop fully drains the Microtask Queue before touching the Callback Queue. Even a 0ms setTimeout waits. console.log("start"); setTimeout(() => console.log("timeout"), 0); Promise.resolve().then(() => console.log("promise")); console.log("end"); Output: start end promise timeout async/await is just syntactic sugar over Promises. The runtime behaviour is exactly the same. Once this clicks, async bugs stop feeling random — and start feeling predictable. What part of async behavior still trips you up? #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #Frontend #AsyncAwait
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development