Optimizing Docker Image Size and Security for Flask API

🐳 I just containerized a Python Flask API using Docker and the results surprised me. Starting point: a naive Dockerfile that produced a 1.15 GB image running as root with zero health monitoring. After applying production best practices: ✅ Image size: 1.15 GB → 136 MB (88% reduction) ✅ Runtime user: root → appuser (non-root) ✅ Build context: 24.18 MB → 1.22 KB ✅ Health checks configured for orchestration compatibility ✅ Docker Compose with Flask + Redis fully orchestrated ✅ Automated score: 100/100 ✅ GitHub Actions CI: Passing I then went a step further; pushed the image to Docker Hub, deleted it locally to simulate a fresh machine, pulled it back down, and ran it. Every security configuration survived the round trip intact. That is what genuine portability looks like. Key things I learned: → The base image you choose is the single biggest factor in image size → Instruction ORDER in a Dockerfile is a performance decision, not just syntax → Running as root inside a container is never acceptable in production → Docker Compose makes multi-container apps manageable with one command I wrote up the full breakdown, every decision, every optimization, and every result in a detailed Medium article. 📖 Read the full article: https://lnkd.in/dzUkHybc 💻 GitHub: https://lnkd.in/dhckiN3d 🐳 Docker Hub: https://lnkd.in/d4hP6Hdf #Docker #DevOps #Python #Flask #Containerization #CloudEngineering #SoftwareEngineering #OpenToWork

  • graphical user interface

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories