Spent hours debugging a “simple” login issue today… turned out it wasn’t simple at all.. Everything looked fine: ✔ Backend deployed ✔ Frontend deployed ✔ Auth working But admin dashboard? Completely broken. The bug? Frontend was calling: /api/users Backend only had: /api/admin/users That’s it. One mismatch → whole feature dead. But wait… it got worse 👇 • Wrong env variable (VITE_API_URL instead of VITE_BACKEND_URL) • Old API domain still cached in production bundle • Missing route mount (/api/auth not connected in Express) So even after fixing one issue… another one popped up. Final fix: ✔ Correct API base URL ✔ Align frontend + backend routes ✔ Mount missing routes ✔ Rebuild + hard refresh Lesson learned: 👉 Bugs in production are rarely “big”..they’re tiny mismatches stacked together. This is what real full-stack debugging looks like. Live: https://www.anikdesign.in/ #webdevelopment #debugging #fullstack #nodejs #react #javascript #backend
Debugging a seemingly simple login issue with frontend-backend mismatch
More Relevant Posts
-
I fixed a like button bug today that looked simple… but wasn’t. Clicks were working… But likes were not updating correctly. The issue? State was not syncing with the backend response. Once I fixed the state update logic, everything worked perfectly. Lesson: • Always sync frontend state with backend data • Don’t rely only on UI changes Small feature. Real learning. What bug did you fix recently? #FullStackDeveloper #WebDevelopment #JavaScript #Debugging #ProblemSolving
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Blindly parsing API responses with JSON.parse is one of the most common ways to let silent bugs into your codebase. When an API changes a field type from string to number, or drops a required key entirely, JSON.parse won't complain - it never does. You only find out when something breaks in production. Schema validation at the API boundary changes this completely. Here's a simple example using Zod: const UserSchema = z.object({ id: z.string().uuid(), email: z.string().email(), role: z.enum(["admin", "user"]), }); const user = UserSchema.parse(await response.json()); If the API payload doesn't match, you get an immediate, descriptive error - not a mystery undefined three layers deep. This also doubles as living documentation for what your app actually expects from external data. Practical takeaway: treat every external API response as untrusted input. Validate at the boundary, not after the damage is done. Are you already validating API payloads in your projects, or still relying on TypeScript types alone to feel safe? #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #TypeScript #FrontendDevelopment #APIDevelopment #CleanCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Your React component is leaking memory and you have no idea. I just read about this pattern in the docs. I realized I was fighting the React lifecycle for months 😅 The problem? Race conditions from uncleared async requests. When you fetch data on state change: - User changes profile 10 times in 1 minute - 10 API requests fire - Only the LAST response updates state - Previous 9 complete but state is already changed - Memory leak + stale data Most devs skip cleanup. Most tutorials show incomplete examples. Result? Wasted requests, stale data, memory leaks. #React #JavaScript #Performance #WebDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝗬𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗱𝗮𝘆, 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗿𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗺𝘆 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆. I was building a new feature for our dashboard. I fetched the data, updated the array, and logged it to the console. `console.log(myData)` 👉 showed the perfect, updated array. The UI? 👉 Completely frozen. Unchanged. Ghosting me. I spent 3 hours questioning everything. ❌ Is my component unmounting? No. ❌ Is the API failing? No. ❌ Did I forget to save the file? (Don't laugh, I checked twice). Then, I finally realized what I did. I committed the ultimate React cardinal sin: 𝗜 𝗺𝘂𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆. I was using `data.push(newItem)` instead of creating a new reference. React was looking at the array, seeing it was the 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲, and saying: "𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲, 𝗜'𝗺 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗿𝗲-𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴!" The 3-hour fix? Replacing `data.push()` with `[...data, newItem]`. Three little dots `...` saved my day. 𝗠𝘆 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀: 1️⃣ Immutability in React isn't just a best practice; it's the law. 2️⃣ `console.log` can lie to you if you don't understand object references. 3️⃣ Sometimes, you just need to step away from the screen for 5 minutes. What’s the most embarrassing bug you’ve spent way too long fixing? Drop it in the comments so I feel less alone! #ReactJS #FrontendDeveloper #Debugging #SoftwareEngineering #DeveloperLife #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most developers think this is a “small mistake”… But it can break your entire application. Today, I debugged an issue where a search feature was showing old API results. At first glance, everything looked correct: - API was working - State was updating - No errors in console But the problem was subtle 👇 When users typed fast, multiple API calls were triggered. And sometimes, a slower previous request finished after the latest one. Result? 👉 Old data overwrote the new results. This is called a race condition — and it’s more common than people think. 💡 How I fixed it: - Used request cancellation (AbortController) - Tracked latest request ID - Ignored outdated responses Simple fix. Big impact. --- As developers, it’s not always about writing code. It’s about understanding how systems behave under real user conditions. Have you faced something like this in your projects? --- #mernstack #reactjs #webdevelopment #javascript #fullstackdeveloper #softwareengineering #codingtips #frontenddevelopment #backenddevelopment #devcommunity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The Queue That Saved Our PDF Pipeline We had a feature that generated detailed reports on demand. A React button, a NestJS endpoint, Puppeteer spinning up a headless browser. Simple enough. Until it was not. At some point, a user triggered 40 reports at once. The server ran out of memory. The request timed out. The user got nothing. The logs were a disaster. The fix was not more RAM. It was BullMQ. The principle is straightforward: do not do expensive work inside a request-response cycle. Accept the request, enqueue the job, return a job ID immediately. The client polls or listens for status. The worker processes jobs one at a time, or in controlled concurrency. Here is what that shift looked like in practice for the PDF pipeline: The NestJS controller goes from calling a service directly to calling queue.add() with a payload. The response changes from a file stream to a job ID and a status URL. A separate worker class, decorated with @Processor, handles the actual Puppeteer work. BullMQ manages retries automatically when Puppeteer crashes. A Bull Board dashboard gives full visibility into pending, active, and failed jobs. The result was not just stability. It was observability. Suddenly we could see exactly which reports were stuck, retry them individually, and set priority on urgent jobs without touching code. If your application does anything slow, anything that involves a third-party call, file generation, email sending, or data processing, that work belongs in a queue. Not in a controller. The request-response cycle is for acknowledgment. The queue is for work. #NestJS #NodeJS #BullMQ #SoftwareArchitecture #BackendDevelopment #WebDevelopment #QueueProcessing #Puppeteer #OpenSource
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Only 2% of developers use Full-stack TypeScript with tRPC for true end-to-end type safety. Have you ever wondered why, despite the evolution in tooling and frameworks, bugs still crawl into your codebase after every release? As a developer who's spent countless late nights debugging mysteriously broken interfaces, I’ve turned to Full-stack TypeScript with tRPC for a solution. Type safety isn't just a buzzword; it translates to real-world stability and confidence in code. TypeScript ensures your data contracts remain intact across your entire stack. But here's the kicker: tRPC elevates this synergy to a level where type errors become almost a non-issue. By generating API types directly from your server-side logic, every part of your application - backend to frontend - remains synchronized automatically. Imagine making a server-side change and your editor flagging exactly where you need to adjust your client logic. It's not just time-saving; it's transformative. I remember using vibe coding to quickly prototype features, and it was liberating to see real-time type validations catch potential runtime errors before they became problems. Here's a quick example of how simple it is to define a type-safe API with tRPC: ```typescript import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server'; const t = initTRPC.create(); export const appRouter = t.router({ greeting: t.procedure .input((val: string) => val.trim()) .query(({ input }) => `Hello ${input}`), }); export type AppRouter = typeof appRouter; ``` This isn't just about using TypeScript; it's about leveraging its full potential to enhance our development workflow. What are your thoughts on adopting full-stack type safety? Are you already using something like tRPC, or is there another framework you find indispensable? Let’s dive into the discussion! #WebDevelopment #TypeScript #Frontend #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Our team analyzed 70 full-stack applications using TypeScript and tRPC, and the results were eye-opening. We found an average 25% reduction in bugs related to API mismatches. End-to-end type safety is not just a buzzword—it's a real game changer. Have you ever considered the impact of strong typing on your full-stack development process? At first, I was skeptical about the learning curve that adding tRPC would introduce. But integrating these robust types into both the backend and frontend created a synchronized development flow I hadn't experienced before. Imagine defining your API in one single place, and knowing that any changes are instantly reflected wherever it's used—no more chasing down those pesky runtime errors. This became our team's standard with TypeScript and tRPC. When changes happen, the confidence in our code remains unshaken. Here's a quick TypeScript snippet showcasing how effortlessly you can define a tRPC procedure: ```typescript import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server'; const t = initTRPC.create(); const appRouter = t.router({ getUser: t.procedure .input(z.string()) .query(async ({ input }) => { return await getUserFromDatabase(input); // Assume this fetches a user by ID }), }); ``` This snippet highlights how simple it is to create a type-safe procedure, ensuring the input and output are consistent across the board. So, have you tried tRPC or similar libraries? How do you ensure end-to-end type safety in your projects? #WebDevelopment #TypeScript #Frontend #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
2 posts ago: a 9,200-line React codebase from 2019. Today: migration done. The numbers: 📊 Codebase - 77 files → 142 focused modules - 0% → 100% TypeScript strict - 11 runtime deps → 3 🛡️ Removed entirely - jQuery - moment.js - axios 0.19 (known CVEs) - Redux + react-redux + redux-thunk - create-react-app 3.4 (abandoned) - Console.log interceptors leaking tokens ⚡ Tooling - HMR: ~8s → <1s (CRA → Vite 8) - react-router v5 → v7 - tsc --strict: 0 errors - ESLint flat config: 0 warnings 🕐 Time - Manual rewrite: weeks, team - My pipeline: days, solo Note: LOC actually *went up* (9.2k → 12.4k). That's what a real migration looks like — types, split files, typed API layer. The win isn't shrinkage. It's 8 dependencies gone, zero CVEs, every file type-checked. Full case study: https://lnkd.in/gsw29EEd --- Here's the thing nobody talks about: Most companies don't rewrite legacy code because it's too expensive and too risky. So they keep patching. Adding duct tape on top of duct tape. Until one day the entire thing breaks and they're stuck. What if the rewrite took days instead of months? What if it cost a fraction of what agencies charge? What if the risk was near zero because the business logic is preserved automatically? That's what I built. If your startup or agency is sitting on a codebase that slows down every sprint — DM me. I'll show you what the modernized version looks like before you commit to anything. --- #react #typescript #vite #javascript #ai #webdevelopment #legacycode #codemodernization #softwaredevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 I just published my first npm package, called "auto-detect-route" When I started working with Express.js, one thing kept slowing me down: Every time I created a new API -> I had to test it manually in Postman. Copy URL, set headers, write body, repeat again and again. Even with Swagger, it didn’t fully solve the problem. You still need to maintain configs and update docs whenever APIs change. So I thought, why not automate this completely? So I built "auto-detect-route". It scans your codebase, detects all your routes, and automatically generates a working API explorer inside your app. No config. No annotations. No manual documentation. ⚙️ How it works 1. Reads your JS/TS files using AST parsing 2. Traverses route structure using Depth First Search (DFS) 3. Resolves nested routers across files 4. Detects request body structure from handlers 5. Generates a ready-to-use API testing UI 💡 What problem does it solve-> 1. No need to manually test APIs in Postman 2. No need to maintain Swagger docs 3. No need to remember routes, params, or request formats Everything is auto-detected from your code. 🧪 Try it app.use('/api-explorer', autoDetectRoute()) Then visit -> http://localhost:3000/api-explorer 📦 NPM: https://lnkd.in/gEVmwKez 🔗 GitHub: https://lnkd.in/gd_ar2Tp Currently built for Express.js (Node.js), planning to extend support to Next.js and other frameworks. Would love feedback from backend developers. What edge cases should I handle next? #nodejs #expressjs #javascript #typescript #opensource #devtools #webdevelopment #npm
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development