3 years ago, I wrote my first API. It worked. Barely. No error handling. No input validation. Hardcoded values everywhere. I was just happy it returned a 200. Fast forward to today - I've shipped APIs in production that handled real client data, prevented revenue losses, and a API that directly convinced a client to onboard. Here's what I wish someone had told me at the start: 1. "It works on my machine" is not done. Done means it works under load, with bad inputs, with network failures, with edge cases you didn't think of. I learned this the hard way. 2. Naming things well is a superpower. The biggest time sink in early code isn't logic - it's trying to understand what past-you was thinking. Write for the next developer, not the compiler. 3. You will touch the database in production. And it will be terrifying the first time. Learn SQL properly. Understand indexes. Respect transactions. I've fixed bugs at the DB level that would have taken down a live client system. 4. Pick boring technology first. I chased new tools early. Then I spent a week building a document processing POC under a tight deadline - and the tools that saved me were the ones I already knew deeply: NestJS and solid API design. Familiarity under pressure is an unfair advantage. 5. Ship something real as fast as you can. Side projects are great. But nothing teaches you faster than code that actual users depend on. The feedback loop is brutal and honest. The gap between "it works" and "it's production-ready" is where most of the real learning happens. Still learning. Always will be. What's one thing you wish you knew when you wrote your first API? Drop it below 👇 #softwaredevelopment #webdevelopment #reactjs #nodejs #apidesign #fullstackdeveloper #devjourney #programming
Lessons Learned from 3 Years of API Development
More Relevant Posts
-
Day 5 When I was a junior dev, this line of code confused the hell out of me: const response = await fetch(url) const data = await response.json() I kept asking — why TWO awaits? Why can't fetch just give me the data directly? So I stopped copy-pasting and went back to first principles. Here's what I learned: → 200 OK does NOT mean the data arrived. It just means the server is saying, "I got your request, here comes the response." The connection is still open. The body is still travelling through the wire. → fetch() returns a promise for the headers first. That's the first await — waiting for the server to respond and say "200 OK." → response.json() returns a second promise for the body. That's the second await — waiting for all the actual data to arrive and parse. Think of it like a phone call. When someone picks up and says "hello" — that's the 200. But you haven't heard the actual message yet. You wait. They speak. Now you have the data. Once I understood THAT — promises stopped feeling scary. I stopped seeing async/await as magic syntax. I started seeing it as: "wait here until the data actually arrives." First principles thinking didn't just teach me promises. It changed how I debug, how I read docs, and how I learn anything new in tech. Stop memorising patterns. Start asking WHY they exist. That one question will make you a better developer faster than any tutorial. — — — What concept finally clicked for you when you went back to first principles? Drop it in the comments 👇 #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #Promises #AsyncAwait #JuniorDeveloper #FirstPrinciples #Programming #SoftwareEngineering #TechCommunity #CodingTips #LearnToCode #NodeJS #Frontend #Backend #Developer
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most developers use JSON every day. Almost none know how to build a parser from scratch. 🤯 Here's a step-by-step blueprint to build your own JSON Parser 👇 🔴 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟭 — 𝗟𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 (𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗿) ∟ Iterate character by character through raw JSON string ∟ Ignore whitespace — spaces, tabs, newlines ∟ Emit foundational tokens: { } [ ] : , 🟠 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟮 — 𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 ∟ When you hit " — start accumulating string ∟ Support escape characters: \n \t \" ∟ Throw syntax error if input ends before closing quote ⚠️ 🟡 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟯 — 𝗧𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 ∟ Detect literals: true false null ∟ Aggregate digits, negatives, decimals & exponents for numbers ∟ Emit structured primitive tokens to continuous list/array 🟢 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟰 — 𝗦𝘆𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 (𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗿) ∟ Take token array & create a Recursive Descent Parser ∟ Read first token — figure out if it's Object, Array or Primitive ∟ Advance token index recursively to build Abstract Syntax Tree 🌳 🔵 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟱 — 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘆𝘀 ∟ Start on [ — loop over contents & call parseValue() ∟ Expect & consume commas between parsed array elements ∟ Return built array data structure on reading terminal ] 🟣 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟲 — 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗢𝗯𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 ∟ Start on { — parse string token as Object Key ∟ Expect & consume : colon token ∟ Call parseValue() recursively to assign property values ∟ Expect commas between pairs, return native Object on } ✅ This is what happens behind the scenes every time you call: JSON.parse('{"name": "dev"}') Understanding how tools work makes you a 10x better developer. 🧠 Now go build it. 💪 Save this 🔖 — share it with a developer who loves going deep. Follow for daily backend & coding blueprints. 💡 #Programming #Coding #JavaScript #SoftwareEngineering #ComputerScience #Backend #WebDevelopment #Tech #LearnToCode #Developer
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
**From developer chaos to clean code — fighting React style drift with AI.** I walked into a production-ready rewrite last month. Three senior engineers. Three React coding styles. One wrote class components. Another used arrow functions without memoization. The third mixed default exports with named functions. The result: a mess of inconsistent patterns that slowed onboarding, confused code reviews, and cost us hours in refactoring time. We couldn't enforce a style guide manually — that failed in the first sprint. So we automated it. We wrote a custom AST-based linting rule powered by Babel and integrated it with a pre-commit hook and GitHub Actions. The rule enforced one and only one pattern: **functional components with explicit memoization, named exports, and consistent hook ordering**. We then added an AI layer using GPT-4 to auto-fix violations on pull requests. The model analyzed the developer's intent and migrated non-compliant components to the target pattern — without breaking tests. Result: - 100% style consistency across 400+ files. - Code review time dropped by 35%. - New devs got productive in 3 days instead of 2 weeks. The tooling stack: TypeScript, Babel parser, ESLint (with custom rules), OpenAI API, and GitHub Actions. No context switching. No meetings. Consistency at scale isn't about rules. It's about automation. If your team wastes cycles on style arguments, build a bot that writes the rules for you. #React #JavaScript #TypeScript #WebDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #CodeQuality #ESLint #AST #Babel #OpenAI #GPT4 #Automation #DevEx #DeveloperExperience #CICD #GitHubActions #Frontend #CleanCode #Patterns #BestPractices #TechnicalDebt #MERN #NodeJS #Productivity #AI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 𝐀𝐏𝐈𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐛𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲. 𝐁𝐮𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦? Every time you book a cab, make a payment, or log into an app — APIs are silently doing the heavy lifting. Yet many developers stop at just “calling APIs” instead of truly understanding Understanding how they work end-to-end - this is where real engineers stand out. A visual breakdown of APIs in clean, practical steps — no jargon, no fluff. Here’s what’s covered 👇 🔹 API architectures → REST, GraphQL, gRPC, SOAP (when to use what) 🔹 Endpoints, URIs, and data formats (JSON/XML) 🔹 Status codes that actually matter (200, 400, 500 mindset) 🔹 Authentication & security → OAuth, API Keys, HTTPS 🔹 Rate limiting & traffic control (production reality) 🔹 API documentation & testing → Swagger, Postman 🔹 Backend implementation → FastAPI, Django, Node.js, Express ⚡ The shift that changes everything: Stop thinking: “How do I call this API?” Start thinking: “How do I design this API for scale, reliability, and clarity?” That’s the difference between: 👉 A developer who uses APIs 👉 And a developer who builds systems Whether you're a beginner trying to understand APIs or a senior dev explaining it to your team — this is for you. 📌 Save this 🔁 Share it with someone learning backend 💬 What’s one API concept you struggled with early in your career? #API #WebDevelopment #LearnToCode #Programming #SoftwareEngineering #TechEducation #RestAPI #JavaScript #DevCommunity #100DaysOfCode #Coding #BuildInPublic #SystemDesign #BackendDevelopment #FullStack #HarinarayananPari
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Built a production-style video transcoding platform from scratch — and it turned out to be one of the more interesting system design exercises I've done. The core challenge: how do you handle large file uploads and heavy processing (FFmpeg-based transcoding) without your backend becoming a bottleneck? The approach I went with: → Multipart uploads with pre-signed S3 URLs — the client uploads directly to S3, the backend never touches the bytes → SQS-based job queue to decouple uploads from processing → Worker service that long-polls the queue, transcodes into 720p/480p, and writes back to S3 → JWT auth with short-lived access tokens + refresh tokens in HTTP-only cookies, with JTI tracked in Redis for session invalidation The stack: React + TypeScript frontend, Python/FastAPI backend, Dockerized multi-service setup. The part I found most valuable wasn't the code — it was thinking through where failures happen in a distributed pipeline and how to design around them. Architecture decisions you make early (sync vs async, where auth lives, how you structure worker retry logic) end up mattering a lot more than they seem when you're just starting out. Still iterating — especially around reliability, retries, and failure handling in distributed systems. Here is the link to the repo : https://lnkd.in/gbyxKY3j #BackendDevelopment #SystemDesign #DistributedSystems #SoftwareEngineering #FastAPI #Docker #AWS
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Three years ago I built my first production API. It broke on the first real request. The test environment worked perfectly. Postman showed green on every endpoint. I was confident. Then a real user hit it with data I had not anticipated and the whole thing crashed silently. No error logged. No alert. Just nothing returned. I spent six hours debugging what turned out to be a single unhandled edge case in the input validation. That day taught me more about production software than any course ever did. The lessons I took from it: Always validate input at the boundary before it touches your business logic. Always log errors with enough context to reproduce them. Always test with data that is wrong, not just data that is right. Production systems do not fail on the happy path. They fail on the edge cases you did not think of. Build for the cases you did not plan for. That is what separates a developer from a production engineer. #NodeJS #BackendDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #API #FullStackDevelopment #WebDevelopment #Python #JavaScript #ProductionSystems #SoftwareDevelopment #Coding #ProgrammingTips #Developer #TechLessons #BuildInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Access Modifiers: Small Keywords, Big Impact As developers, we write classes, methods, and properties every day. But one thing that often gets overlooked is: 👉 Who should be allowed to access this? That’s exactly what Access Modifiers control. 💡 What are Access Modifiers? Access Modifiers are keywords that define the visibility of your code. In simple words: They decide who can use what inside your application. 🧱 The Most Common Types (in TypeScript / OOP) public Accessible from anywhere 👉 Default behavior in most cases private Accessible only داخل نفس الكلاس 👉 Used to protect internal logic protected Accessible داخل الكلاس + الكلاسات اللي بتورث منه 👉 Useful with inheritance readonly Can be read but not modified after initialization 🎯 Why does this matter? Because without control, your code becomes: Hard to manage Easy to break Difficult to debug Access Modifiers help you: ✅ Protect your data ✅ Control how your code is used ✅ Write cleaner, more predictable code ✅ Avoid unexpected side effects 🛠 Real Example Imagine you have a class for a User: You don’t want anyone to directly change the password You only allow updates through a specific method 👉 That’s where private comes in Instead of exposing everything, you control access properly. 🔥 Common Mistake A lot of developers use public for everything. It works… but it’s risky. Good developers don’t just write code that works — they write code that is safe and controlled. 💬 Simple Rule Start with the most restrictive (private) Then open access only when needed 🔥 Final Thought Access Modifiers may look small… but they make a huge difference in code quality. If you want to level up your coding skills, start thinking about who should access your code — not just how it works. #AccessModifiers #TypeScript #OOP #SoftwareEngineering #CleanCode #Angular #Backend #CodingTips
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
"Could mastering TypeScript's advanced generics and inference cut your development time in half?" We've seen a 48% reduction in code refactoring time by leveraging TypeScript's powerful type-level programming. As a senior developer, diving deep into generics and type inference has transformed the way I write code. It's like vibe coding your way to scalable and maintainable solutions. Consider a scenario where you have a highly reusable component that needs to adapt to various data shapes. Advanced generics allow us to define flexible, yet type-safe APIs, boosting our productivity and reducing runtime errors. For instance, here's a pattern I often use: ```typescript type ApiResponse<T> = { status: number; payload: T; }; function fetchData<T>(endpoint: string): Promise<ApiResponse<T>> { // Imagine fetching data from an endpoint... return fetch(endpoint) .then(response => response.json()) .then(data => ({ status: response.status, payload: data as T })); } ``` Notice how the generic `<T>` allows us to infer the payload type dynamically, ensuring type safety across the board. But here's the dilemma: Does diving deeper into TypeScript's type system pay off in the long run, or does it complicate your codebase? From my perspective, the immediate clarity and long-term stability are worth the initial learning curve. But I'm curious: Do you think the benefits of advanced generics and inference outweigh their complexity? What's your experience with TypeScript type-level programming been like? Let's discuss in the comments. #WebDevelopment #TypeScript #Frontend #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Don't stop learning. Here's a good list of tech articles to read over the upcoming days: 9/ Dependency Injection in Node.js & TypeScript. The Part Nobody Teaches You: ↳ https://lnkd.in/d8Jhcyds Author: Petar Ivanov 8/ Concurrency Is Not Parallelism: ↳ https://lnkd.in/dqWibVbZ Author: Neo Kim 7/ How Engineering Leaders Stay Calm and Effective When It Gets Personal: ↳ https://lnkd.in/d4imYzuh Author: Gregor Ojstersek 6/ Your Database Doesn't Trust the Server. That's Why It Writes Everything Twice: ↳ https://lnkd.in/dWxgR8Vr Author: Raul Junco 5/ Clean Code: 7 tips to write clean functions: ↳ https://lnkd.in/dPyX68T3 Author: Daniel Moka 4/ N-Layered vs Clean vs Vertical Slice Architecture: ↳ https://lnkd.in/dBQvG-NP Author: Anton Martyniuk 3/ System Design was HARD until I Learned these 30 Concepts: ↳ https://lnkd.in/ds3YThbs Author: Ashish Pratap Singh 2/ Strong vs Eventual Consistency in Distributed Systems: ↳ https://lnkd.in/dFvaT_hj Author: Nikki Siapno 1/ Understanding Microservices: Core Concepts and Benefits: ↳ https://lnkd.in/d7uYXN3c Author: Milan Jovanović What else would you add to this list? —— 👋 Join 30,000+ SWEs learning JS, React, Node.js, and Software Architecture: https://thetshaped.dev/ ——— 💾 Save this for later. ♻ Repost to help others find it. ➕ Follow Petar Ivanov + turn on notifications. #javascript #softwareengineering #programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Claude Code's source code leaked yesterday. 512,000 lines of TypeScript, now public. I went through it and extracted the architectural patterns that show up consistently across the codebase — the engineering decisions behind how it works. A few examples: Every tool throws a typed error on failure — never returns { success: false }. The framework catches it and formats it for the LLM. The tool has one job: do the work or throw. One schema definition drives both TypeScript types and JSON validation. They share one source and can never drift. Concurrency safety is evaluated per invocation, not declared statically. Same tool, different answer depending on the input. Packaged all 16 as portable skill files that load automatically into Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex, and OpenCode. Zero config. MIT license. → https://lnkd.in/d6nQvdGf #AIEngineering #ClaudeCode #DeveloperTools #OpenSource
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
The gap between "works" and "production-ready" is where most devs actually level up. Your point about boring tech under pressure hits home, experienced that with Redis vs some shiny new cache layer when a client demo started failing. Side note: Wish someone had warned me that most of my early API "testing" was just hope dressed up as curl commands.