A while ago, I completed an assessment project focused on building and deploying a Flask application with a production mindset. My work comprised of: Flask app architecture Monitoring and observability Security and compliance considerations Infrastructure Provisioning and Deployment best practices It became a classic scenario of; Knowing the skill is important, but speed also matters. This has reinforced my active investment in Agentic AI — and the MCP shift. The Model Context Protocol is looking very much widely adoptable after the LLM + service tools phase. Truth be told, it is tough, but the numerous possibilities help to fuel the drive. Hopefully in the near future peripheral stages of projects are baked, reviewed or assessed with a few models. Feedbacks are welcome: https://lnkd.in/dnh8VdJd #DevOpsProject #Flaskapp #python #AgenticAI #MCP #Bestpractices #Infrasecurity
Flask App Development with Agentic AI and MCP
More Relevant Posts
-
I just wrapped up Anthropic's course on the Model Context Protocol (MCP). If you’ve ever built integrations between AI models and external services, you know it usually means writing a lot of custom boilerplate code and manually handling JSON schemas. The most valuable takeaway from this course was seeing how MCP standardizes that entire process. Instead of building one-off connections, MCP shifts the integration burden to a consistent architecture based on three clean primitives: Tools (controlled by the model), Resources (controlled by the app), and Prompts (controlled by the user). Getting hands-on with the Python SDK to build an MCP server—and replacing manual schema writing with simple decorators—showed exactly how much this protocol reduces the friction of connecting AI to real-world data and APIs. A really practical look at how AI infrastructure is maturing and becoming easier to scale. #ArtificialIntelligence #ModelContextProtocol #Anthropic #Python #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I made CrewAI 34x faster. With one line of code. I kept hitting the same wall running AI agents in production: Serialization was slow. Tool execution was slow. Database search was slow. So instead of complaining, I wrote Rust. Introducing fast-crewai — a drop-in performance acceleration layer for CrewAI that requires zero changes to your existing Python code. The benchmarks: → 34x faster serialization (serde vs Python JSON) → 17x faster tool execution (result caching + fast JSON validation) → 11x faster database search (FTS5 with BM25 ranking) → 99% less memory on tool execution → 58% less memory on serialization How do you use it? pip install fast-crewai import fast_crewai.shim That's it. Your CrewAI multi-agent system is now Rust-accelerated. No rewrites. No new APIs. No vendor lock-in. MIT licensed. Works on Python 3.10–3.13, Linux, macOS, and Windows. Here's the thing nobody talks about in the AI agent space: the bottleneck isn't the LLM API call — it's everything around it. The serialization overhead. The memory lookups. The task scheduling. The database queries for RAG retrieval. I moved the hot path to Rust using PyO3 bindings and kept the Python interface identical. Smart monkey patching through dynamic inheritance handles the rest. Under the hood: serde for serialization, r2d2 connection pooling, SQLite FTS5 for full-text search, Tokio for parallel task scheduling, and TF-IDF cosine similarity for semantic memory search. My thesis is that Python AI ecosystem doesn't need to be slow. It just needs a Rust accelerator underneath. I am applying the same pattern across LLM infrastructure — fast-crewai is one piece of that puzzle. The pattern is always the same: Python for developer velocity, Rust for production performance. If you're building AI agents at scale, you shouldn't have to choose between the two. If you're running CrewAI agents in production, try it and tell me what breaks. That's the most helpful thing you can do for open source. Building in the AI infrastructure space? I'd love to connect. #AIAgents #CrewAI #RustLang #Python #OpenSource #LLM #GenerativeAI #RAG #AIInfrastructure #DevTools #MLOps #BuildInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🎓 Bite Sized Information taken from my courses in Gen AI Space Building your own MCP server in Python takes about 20 lines of code. Here's why that matters. 🤖 The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Python SDK handles the heavy lifting. You define Tools using simple `@mcp.tool()` decorators with typed parameters and Resources as URI-addressable endpoints. The SDK manages the entire JSON-RPC transport layer underneath. ⚡ Think of it like building a REST API with Flask — but instead of serving browsers, you're serving AI agents. Import the SDK, decorate a function, describe its parameters, and run the server. 🔗 The real power: once built, your server works with Claude Desktop, LangChain, LlamaIndex, and OpenAI Agents SDK — zero code changes required. Write once, connect everywhere. 🧠 **Takeaway:** MCP servers let you give any compatible AI agent access to your custom tools and data through a single standard interface. What's the first tool you'd expose to an AI agent through your own MCP server? #MCP #GenAI #PythonDevelopment #AIAgents #CloudAlchemy Follow me for more such insightful posts
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚨 Token limits aren’t the real problem — context selection is. While working on LLM pipelines, I kept running into the same trade-off: • Truncate old messages → lose useful context • Send everything → waste tokens and increase cost Neither felt right. So I started experimenting with a different approach: 👉 Treat memory as compression + retrieval What worked surprisingly well: • Older messages → compressed into a short rolling summary (TextRank) • Recent messages → filtered using TF-IDF to keep only what’s relevant • Final prompt → summary + relevant context (not full history) Result: ✔ stays within token limits ✔ preserves important context ✔ reduces unnecessary token usage And the interesting part — this works without heavy infra or embeddings. So instead of asking: “how do I fit everything into the context window?” A better question is: 👉 what actually deserves to be in the context? I packaged this into a small Python library while experimenting. If you're building with LLMs, curious how you're handling memory — truncation, embeddings, or something else? #LLM #AIEngineering #Python #MLOps #RAG #LLMOps
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
A supply chain attack hit a Python package with ~3 million daily downloads. Malicious code executed automatically on every Python process startup for roughly 40 minutes, enough time to harvest credentials and install a persistent backdoor. That package was LiteLLM, one of the most widely used AI gateway libraries in production environments. And the attack didn't even come through LiteLLM's own code; it came through a compromised GitHub Action in their CI/CD pipeline. The deeper lesson here isn't specific to LiteLLM. It's about how engineering teams think (or don't think) about AI gateways as infrastructure. A proxy that sees your LLM API keys, your prompts, and sits in the request path between your applications and your model providers isn't a dev tool. It's critical infrastructure. We wrote a breakdown of what happened, what the migration path looks like, and what questions to ask of any AI gateway you're evaluating. Link in comments.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Built an Enterprise RAG-Based Knowledge Retrieval System I recently worked on designing and implementing a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) based chatbot to improve enterprise knowledge access. 🔍 Problem: Teams were spending significant time searching across scattered documents and knowledge bases. 💡 Solution: Developed a secure, scalable system using: • LLM embeddings for semantic understanding • Vector database for efficient similarity search • Cloud-native architecture for scalability and high availability 📈 Impact: • Improved information retrieval efficiency by ~20% • Reduced manual search effort across teams • Enabled faster decision-making with contextual responses ⚙️ Tech Stack: Java, Python, Vector DB, LLMs, Microservices, GCP This project reflects how AI/ML (RAG + LLMs) can be integrated into real-world enterprise systems to drive productivity and efficiency. 🔗 GitHub: https://lnkd.in/dW-bhYNv #EngineeringManager #AI #MachineLearning #LLM #RAG #SystemDesign #Microservices #Cloud #Java #CPlusPlus
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁: 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 (𝗥𝗔𝗚-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱) 📌 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀: Built a system to convert unstructured PDFs into an interactive knowledge base, enabling fast and private information retrieval. ⚙️ 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀: • Ingests and splits documents into chunks • Generates embeddings and stores them in a vector DB • Retrieves relevant context and uses an LLM to answer queries 🛠️ 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸: Python | LangChain | HuggingFace Embeddings | ChromaDB | Llama 3.1 (Groq API) | Streamlit | Docker 💡 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗱: • Designing end-to-end data pipelines • Working with vector databases & semantic search • Integrating LLMs into real-world systems • Building scalable, privacy-focused solutions Looking forward to feedback and discussions — happy to connect and collaborate! 🚀 #ArtificialIntelligence #RAG #LLM
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Efficient Duplicate Detection with Hash Sets | LeetCode Today, I tackled the Contains Duplicate problem. While the brute force approach is often the first instinct, optimizing for time complexity is where the real fun begins! 💡 The Problem: Given an integer array nums, return true if any value appears at least twice in the array, and return false if every element is distinct. ⚡ My Approach: I utilized a Hash Set to track elements as I traversed the array. This allows for near-instantaneous lookups compared to nested loops. 👉 The Logic: Initialize an empty set seen. Iterate through the array once. For each number, check: "Have I seen this before?" (Is it in the set?) If Yes → Return True immediately. If No → Add the number to the set and keep moving. 🔥 Complexity Analysis: ⏱ Time Complexity: $O(n)$ – We only pass through the list once. 📦 Space Complexity: $O(n)$ – In the worst case (all unique elements), we store all $n$ elements in the set. 🏆 The Result: ✔️ Accepted: All 77 test cases passed. ✔️ Performance: 9 ms runtime, beating 73.44% of Python3 submissions! 📌 Key Takeaway: Using a Set turns a potential $O(n^2)$ search into a sleek $O(n)$ operation. Choosing the right data structure isn't just about passing tests; it's about writing scalable, "production-ready" code. 💻 Tech Stack: #Python | #DataStructures | #Algorithms #leetcode #dsa #coding #programming #softwareengineering #100DaysOfCode #pythonprogramming #tech #growthmindset
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore related topics
- Model Context Protocol (MCP) for Development Environments
- Assessing Agentic AI Project Viability
- Using LLMs as Microservices in Application Development
- Best Practices for Deploying LLM Systems
- How to Build Production-Ready AI Agents
- How Mcp Improves AI Agents
- How to Improve Agent Performance With Llms
- Understanding the Future of Agentic AI
- How to Build Reliable LLM Systems for Production
- How to Boost Productivity With Developer Agents
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
Cool stuff, boss.