Manuel Blinkert’s Post

Most people are thinking about AI coding tools completely wrong. They obsess over: → “Which tool is best? Claude? Cursor? Windsurf? Codex?” But that’s not the real problem. The real problem is 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭. All these tools perform significantly better if context is managed correctly. Here’s what actually happens: AI coding agents do NOT: - read your whole repo every time - understand your architecture automatically - magically infer how your system works Instead, they rely on: 1. What’s currently open in the workspace 2. What they can retrieve from files 3. Explicit instruction files (like CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, rules, etc.) If your context is weak → your results will be weak. No matter how good the model is. The key insight: You don’t need a better AI tool. You need a better context system. What I’m doing now: Instead of relying on scattered READMEs and assumptions, I built a structured setup: → One workspace repo that contains: - global architecture - system boundaries - rules for AI agents → Multiple real repos (frontend, backend, database, docs) → One canonical context file: 𝐀𝐈_𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐗𝐓.𝐦𝐝 → Thin adapters per tool: - CLAUDE.md - AGENTS.md - .cursor/rules All of them point to the same source of truth. Result: The AI finally: - understands the system as a whole - respects boundaries between repos - produces consistent answers and decisions Takeaway: Stop switching tools. Start designing your context layer. That’s where the real leverage is. Curious how others are handling multi-repo context for AI agents. #AI #SoftwareEngineering #DeveloperTools #LLM #AIEngineering

Do try vibedoctor.io if you are using AI for code assistance.

Like
Reply

Manuel Blinkert designing that structured context system is definitely where the real leverage is.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories