🚀 I thought I understood data… until I realized I was calculating it wrong Early on, my approach was simple: If the query runs If the dashboard looks clean If the numbers seem consistent 👉 Then it must be correct Turns out, that’s a dangerous assumption. I came across a case where everything looked perfect — no missing data, no errors, clean trends. But the metric was still wrong. The issue? 👉 Aggregation at the wrong level Fixing that changed the number by ~16%. Same data. Completely different outcome. That’s when I realized: 👉 Data doesn’t fail loudly 👉 It fails silently And the scariest part? Most incorrect metrics still look correct. Since then, I’ve stopped just writing queries — and started questioning the logic behind them. Curious — what’s one mistake that changed how you look at data? #DataAnalytics #SQL #DataEngineering #AnalyticsEngineering #DataQuality #BusinessIntelligence #LearningInPublic
Data Doesn't Fail Loudly, It Fails Silently
More Relevant Posts
-
If I had to approach any dataset today, this is the simple framework I’d follow: 1. Understand the problem → What question am I trying to answer? 2. Explore the data → What columns exist? → Any missing or unusual values? 3. Clean the data → Handle nulls → Remove duplicates → Fix inconsistencies 4. Analyze → Write queries → Find patterns and trends 5. Validate → Does the result actually make sense? → Cross-check assumptions 6. Communicate → Present insights clearly → Focus on what matters Earlier, I used to jump straight to step 4. Now I’m realizing the real work happens before and after that. Still refining this approach, but it’s already helping me stay more structured. Do you follow a similar process, or something different? 👇 (Feel free to save this if it helps) #DataAnalytics #SQL #DataThinking #Learning #DataWorkflow
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗜 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮. Earlier, whenever I got a dataset, I would directly start working on it. 𝗖𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗻 → 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘇𝗲 → 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. But now, I pause and ask: What problem am I actually solving? Because many times, the dataset is not the problem. The real question is: 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗴𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁? I’ve also noticed this in my team. Before jumping into analysis, discussions usually start with: - 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱? - 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿? - 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘄𝗲 𝗱𝗼 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁? Even managers focus more on clarity of problem than complexity of solution. For example: - 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 🔄 Find users who are making unusually high number of transactions in a single day. - 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵 ↩️ Start simple and check transaction count per user. SELECT user_id, COUNT() AS txn_count FROM transactions WHERE txn_date >= CURRENT_DATE - 1 GROUP BY user_id HAVING COUNT() > 10; 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲? A quick list of users with high activity. 𝗡𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗽 ⤵️ Check if it’s normal behavior… or something that needs attention. This small shift helped me a lot. Less confusion. More clarity. Now I focus on understanding the problem first, not just running queries. How do you usually define the problem before starting your analysis? #DataAnalytics #SQL #ProblemSolving #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
For a long time, I thought being fast with data was a good thing. • Write the query quickly. • Build the dashboard fast. • Move to the next task. What I eventually learned is this: Speed doesn’t matter if you don’t understand what you’re looking at. Every time I rushed, I missed something: • a wrong assumption in the data • a number that didn’t make sense • a detail that changed the whole picture When I slowed down, things improved: • fewer mistakes • cleaner logic • clearer outputs Now I spend more time understanding before doing. It feels slower. But the result is better. Data work isn’t about moving fast. It’s about getting it right. #dataanalytics #datascience #sql
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One thing I didn’t expect when working with data: Most problems aren’t clearly defined. There’s no perfect dataset. No exact question. No clean starting point. Earlier, that used to slow me down. I’d spend time trying to figure out: “What exactly am I supposed to find?” But now I approach it differently. Instead of waiting for clarity, I start with: → What does this system look like overall? → What could possibly go wrong here? → If something is inefficient, where would it show up first? From there, the analysis starts to take shape. Not because the data is perfect, but because the direction becomes clearer. That shift made a big difference. Because in real scenarios, you’re not given a problem statement. You’re expected to define it. And honestly, that’s the part I’ve started enjoying the most. Curious - how do you usually approach analysis when the problem isn’t clearly defined? #DataAnalytics #SQL #PowerBI #ProblemSolving #BusinessAnalytics
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One thing I’ve learned transitioning into Data Analytics: Tools don’t make you a good analyst. Thinking does. Before writing any SQL query, I ask: What exactly is the problem? What data do I need? What does success look like? Engineering taught me structure. Data Analytics applies it. Insight: Clarity > Complexity. #DataAnalytics #CriticalThinking #ProblemSolving
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Before I analyze any dataset, I check these 3 things first: Not the charts. Not the SQL. Not the dashboard. Just these: 1. Missing values If important columns have gaps, your insights can be misleading. 2. Data types Numbers stored as text, dates formatted incorrectly, small issues can result to big problems. 3. Duplicates One duplicate row can quietly distort your entire analysis. I didn’t pay enough attention to these when I started. Now, I don’t skip them. Because good analysis doesn’t start with tools It starts with clean, reliable data. If you're learning data analytics, start here. What’s the first thing you check when you get a new dataset? #DataAnalytics #DataCleaning #LearningJourney #Upskilling #Beginners
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Your data can pass NULL checks and still be completely wrong. Day-to-day data work can get messy. Even after removing/treating NULLs and duplicates, your dataset might still not be reliable. That’s where validity checks come in. Some errors happen earlier in the pipeline, so the data reaches your database with values that don’t make sense: ❌negative amounts ❌unrealistic ages 🚨inconsistent dates (like a churn date before registration) This kind of noise can distort your analysis and erode stakeholders’ trust. A simple way to catch these issues is using WHERE NOT. You define what should be true according to your business logic and flag everything that breaks it. It’s like saying: “If any of these conditions are not met, there’s a problem. Show me those rows.” What’s your go-to trick to validate data faster? Leave it in the comments 👇 📌 Found this useful? Save it for later. #SQLTips #DataAnalytics #DataScience #SQL #Analytics #BusinessIntelligence #DataEngineer #LearnSQL
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Lately I’ve been noticing one pattern more and more. In real projects, it keeps breaking analytics. The same dataset can produce completely different answers depending on how you define the metric. 🦄 Different filters. 🦄 Different assumptions. 🦄 Different levels of aggregation. And at some point it starts to look like a “data issue”. But it isn’t. It’s a thinking issue. SQL is rarely the bottleneck. The real challenge is defining: 🪀 what exactly you’re measuring 🪀 how consistently it’s calculated 🪀 and what business question it actually answers Feels like the hardest part in analytics is not writing queries - it’s asking the right questions first. And this applies to any tool - the only difference is where the logic breaks. #dataanalytics #businessanalytics #productanalytics #sql #analytics #datascience #datathinking
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗦𝗤𝗟 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘀. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗶𝘅 𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱: 𝙒𝙃𝙀𝙍𝙀. If you want clean data, relevant insights, and fewer messy outputs, you need to master filtering. The 𝘞𝘏𝘌𝘙𝘌 clause helps you keep the right rows and remove the noise. Here’s why that matters: • It isolates the data you actually care about • It removes irrelevant records early • It makes your analysis faster and more accurate • It is the foundation of data clean-up Why is this so critical? Because real-world data is noisy. 𝗚𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗱𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗯𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. 1. They start by filtering what matters. 2. That is how you turn raw tables into useful answers. CTA: What’s the first SQL command you learned that actually changed how you worked with data? #SQL #DataAnalytics #DataCleaning #DataAnalyst #LearnSQL
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The moment you finish a data analysis course, you just feel pumped. Like yeah, I'm ready now. Everything made sense, the examples were clean, the steps looked straightforward and you're even excited to finally work with real data. Then you open a dataset... And you're like: "oh my God, what's all this??" Missing values everywhere, wrong data types, the same thing spelt in 3 different ways, columns that don't even make sense at first glance. At that point, analysis is not even the problem again.😭 You have to start cleaning first — fixing, checking, correcting — just to get the data into a state you can actually work with. And this is the part people overlook or try to rush through. But if your data is messy, everything you build on it will be wrong. Your insights won't hold and your decisions won't stand. So you sit with it, take your time and clean it properly. Only then can you move to the analysis — asking the right questions, finding patterns, getting insights that actually mean something. It's funny because a course makes you feel ready, but real data will humble you instantly. That's when you realize the course prepared you, but the data will teach you. Can anyone relate? Drop it in the comments 👇 #DataAnalysis #DataCleaning #DataAnalytics #DataQuality #DataJourney #DataSkills
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
In my case, the issue came from calculating AOV at the payment level instead of the order level — small change, but it completely shifted the business interpretation.