C++ under the hood of Python's success

𝗣𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗻 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁. Until you realize C++ is the one carrying it. --- Python is the Ferrari everyone brags about. But behind every production ML pipeline, game engine, and real-time system? C++ is the flatbed truck doing the actual heavy lifting. → NumPy? C under the hood. → PyTorch? C++ core. → CPython itself? Written in C. Python gives you the syntax. C++ gives it the speed to exist. Most devs never look under the hood. The ones who do? They build differently. --- I'm not saying ditch Python. I'm saying: know what's actually running your code. The abstraction is the feature. But ignorance of what's beneath it is a liability. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸? Drop it below 👇 #Python #CPlusPlus #SoftwareEngineering #SystemsThinking #Developer

  • No alternative text description for this image

Good morning Linkedin people 🌞🌻🌄

This argument is kinda flawed, sir. Saying Python isn’t fast because it uses C/C++ underneath is like saying C isn’t impressive because it compiles to machine code… and that to binary… and ultimately runs on silicon physics. Everything is built on something deeper, sir. Python, C++, assembly, machine code — they’re layers of abstraction, not competitors in a “who’s real” contest. You don’t dismiss a stove because the sun also produces heat, sir. You choose tools based on purpose: Python → productivity, rapid development, ML, automation C/C++ → performance-critical systems, engines, low-level control And yeah, Python intentionally uses C/C++ for speed — that’s smart engineering, not a weakness, sir. Abstraction isn’t cheating. It’s how software scales. The real skill isn’t picking sides — it’s knowing when to use what, sir.

Python isn’t “fast because of C++.” It’s fast because anything performance‑critical gets pushed down into lower‑level layers — C, C++, Rust, CUDA, Metal, vendor kernels, even custom accelerators. That’s how real systems are built. Rust isn’t “C in Rust.” It’s a modern systems language built for: memory safety without a GC deterministic performance zero‑cost abstractions strong concurrency guarantees tooling focused on correctness and reproducibility When I need raw execution, I reach for Rust — not because it mimics C, but because it removes entire classes of bugs C/C++ still allow. Python is the orchestration layer. The heavy lifting underneath today is a polyglot mix: C for older scientific stacks C++ for big frameworks like PyTorch Rust for safety‑critical and high‑performance components CUDA/Metal for GPU paths vendor kernels for hardware‑specific acceleration Modern ML, data, and systems pipelines are polyglot by design. Saying “C++ is carrying Python” oversimplifies what’s actually happening under the hood. The abstraction is the feature. Knowing the layers beneath it — all of them, not just C++ — is what makes you a systems‑minded engineer.

Now, discover Rust and it's a standalone Lamborghini. Here is a post:https://hokwangchoi.com/blog/rust-key-concepts

  • No alternative text description for this image

Is it actually important to know C++ to write good python? If so, what exactly do we need to know and why?

C++ be like... Me ka ladle 😂 meow 😂

Ohh! That's why python is slower than C++ 😅😄

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories