Python Data Structures: Lists, Indexing, and Memory

Python for Developers | Step 3 — Data Structures (Q&A Series) Instead of using just variables containing single values, in real development work we often deal with collections of data. What looked simple in the course—lists, dictionaries, sets, tuples—starts behaving differently once you rely on them in real scenarios. Not because they change, but because their internal behavior starts to matter. This post is not a recap. It’s a breakdown of the parts that were easy to miss, or simply not emphasized. List — more than just a container At first glance, when you create a list like my_list = [], it appears to be a simple ordered collection of values, indexed starting from 0. In reality, it’s a dynamic array, and that detail changes how you should use it. What does that mean? A list stores elements in a contiguous block of memory. This is why: Access by index is fast → O(1) But inserting in the middle is expensive → O(n) Why does .append() feel fast, but .insert() doesn’t? Because: - .append() adds at the end → no shifting → efficient - .insert(i, x) shifts all elements after index i → costly So two operations that look similar in syntax behave very differently in performance. Do lists store values or something else? They store references, not copies. Meaning: -When you add an object to a list, you’re storing a pointer to it -Not duplicating it This leads to behavior that can be unexpected: If the same object is referenced multiple times, modifying it affects all appearances. Is slicing just “accessing part of the list”? No. new_list = my_list[1:3] This creates a new list (copy), not a view. Why it matters: -Extra memory is used -Time complexity becomes proportional to slice size Then when does a list stop being the right choice? -When you insert/delete frequently in the middle -When memory copies become costly -When you assume each element is independent, but in reality, multiple elements can reference the same object. Lists are simple to use, but not always simple in behavior. Looks basic? Try this and think twice: What do you think the output will be, and why? rows = [[0]*3]*3 rows[0][0] = 1 print(rows) Now compare it with: rows = [[0]*3 for _ in range(3)] rows[0][0] = 1 print(rows) What changed between the two, and why did it affect the result? Surely no one knows this better than the DataCamp tutor herself Jasmin Ludolf, I’d love to hear your perspective, do you agree with this explanation, and how would you approach the same example?

  • graphical user interface, application

Keep going 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories