Jimi Vaubien’s Post

Antonio Cuni (20 years PyPy core) dropped SPy: a compiled Python variant designed for performance. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 Python's dynamism makes it fundamentally hard to optimize. Everything is mutable, dispatch is complex, and pointer chasing destroys cache locality. JITs help but introduce unpredictable performance cliffs. SPy takes a different approach: remove the dynamism that kills performance, but add new features that keep Python's expressiveness intact. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗦𝗣𝘆 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁 👉🏽 Import time vs runtime: The world freezes after imports. Modules and classes become immutable at runtime. 👉🏽 Redshifting: Blue expressions evaluate at compile time, red at runtime. It's partial evaluation on steroids. 👉🏽 @blue functions: Write metaprogramming code that runs during compilation. Like C++ templates, but debuggable with Python's interpreter. 👉🏽 Static dispatch: Operator lookup happens at compile time based on static types. The runtime overhead just vanishes. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁? A raytracing example runs 200x faster than CPython. The compiler generates code comparable to C/Rust, with predictable performance. 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲-𝗼𝗳𝗳𝘀 SPy isn't 100% Python compatible (by design). It formalizes constraints that Python devs already follow in practice: stable types, immutable classes, minimal monkey-patching. But you get metaprogramming power back through , which feel surprisingly natural. The project is early stage but the ideas are solid. Worth watching if you care about Python performance without JIT unpredictability. #python #ai #opensource #llm

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories