I have this idea about agentic coding that might sound crazy: prefer Rust over Python. Here's my thinking. The real challenge in coding isn't writing the code itself. It's understanding requirements clearly. To reach your goal, you need answers to tons of questions. But first, you need to know which questions even exist. This is where vibe coding breaks down. You tell the LLM your great idea, and it generates very performant code. A single file with thousands of lines that mostly works fine. But then problems appear. This feature? Not like that. That other one? Don't want it at all. The vibe coded version becomes a compilation of suggestions for how your goal could be implemented, not what you actually need. And because it vibe coded everything together, you don't want to read that code yourself. Step by step coding works better. Instead of handing over your main goal, you break things down. You become the manager. You can't go do your own thing while the Agent codes. You focus on the smaller steps needed to reach the final goal. Here's the key: whether you use Rust or Python doesn't matter much when you code in small steps. The Agent handles both well with this approach. So why not go directly with Rust? I know what's coming: "but library support..." Yes, if you need PyTorch or specialized ML frameworks, use Python. But for many use cases, Rust gives you real benefits. Lower CPU and RAM usage. No garbage collector. Your app opens in milliseconds. It does its job multiple factors faster. Plus, for some goals, you want that low-level power. And yes, you get to feel cool for using Rust. #AgenticCoding #Rust #SoftwareDevelopment
Javed A. Butt’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
🚀 Rethinking Efficiency in Python: It’s Not Just About Speed When I first learned about Python efficiency, I thought it was all about making code faster. But after practicing and experimenting, I realized something: efficiency is a mindset, not just a technique. Here’s what I mean: 1️⃣ Efficiency starts with clarity – Code that’s easy to read and reason about is inherently faster to maintain and debug. Sometimes the “inefficient-looking” version is actually more productive in the long run. 2️⃣ Pick the right tool, not the trendy trick – Instead of chasing every optimization hack, I focus on the purpose of my code. For example, using a dict or set where it truly matters, rather than forcing a one-liner just to look slick. 3️⃣ Measure, then optimize – I’ve started profiling code. Many “slow” sections aren’t bottlenecks at all. Efficiency isn’t about guessing; it’s about data-driven decisions, just like real engineering. 4️⃣ Think like Python, not like C – Python shines when we leverage its high-level abstractions. Fighting Python with low-level hacks often costs more in complexity than the performance gain. 💡 The real efficiency comes from aligning code, intent, and readability. Speed will follow—but maintainability lasts. I’m curious—how do you define efficiency in your Python projects? #Python #CodingMindset #CleanCode #DataEngineering #Programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🧘♀️ The Zen of Python: Understanding the Guiding Principles If you’ve ever typed or seen👇 > import this you’ve probably seen a list of short, poetic lines appear, The Zen of Python. But those lines aren’t just cute phrases. They’re the heart of Python’s design philosophy, the mindset that makes Python feel so natural and human and beginner-friendly. Here are a few that always resonate with me: 💡 “Beautiful is better than ugly.” Readable, clean code is always worth the effort. Future-you will thank present-you. 💡 “Explicit is better than implicit.” Clarity over cleverness, always. Make your code say exactly what it does. 💡 “Simple is better than complex.” Complexity isn’t a sign of intelligence. Simplicity is a sign of mastery. 💡 “Readability counts.” Because code is read more often than it’s written. 💡 “Now is better than never.” Don’t wait for the perfect moment to build or learn something. Start small. Iterate. Improve. The Zen of Python isn’t just for coding - it’s a great mindset for growth, learning, and problem-solving in general. Clarity. Simplicity. Patience. Focus. Whenever I get lost in logic or perfectionism, I come back to this: > “If the implementation is hard to explain, it’s a bad idea.” Sometimes the best solutions - in code and life - are the simplest ones. ✨ What’s your favorite line from The Zen of Python? Or which principle do you find hardest to follow in your coding journey? #Python #DataScience #Programming #LearningJourney #CodeNewbie #Beginner
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The single biggest lie about Python is that it’s "easy." 🐍 It is. Until you run into an IndentationError at 2 AM. That error isn't a bug; it's a mindset problem. Most people treat Python's indentation as a picky rule. Top developers treat it as a clarity framework. Here’s the mental model to move from frustration to flow with Python structure: ➡️ Hard Truth: Indentation IS the Function In most languages, curly braces {} define a block of code. In Python, the four spaces are the braces. You aren't just formatting for aesthetics; you are defining the program's logic. Mess up the spacing, and you mess up the fundamental structure. Don't think of it as "code and spacing," think of it as "code defined by spacing." ➡️ The Rule of Visual Alignment If you have to trace a function or loop's boundaries with your finger, your code is too complex. Every line within a block must visually align perfectly. The moment a line breaks that vertical alignment, you should immediately know it belongs to the next logical container or has ended its current one. Use a linter (like Pylint) to enforce this visually. ➡️ Context: The "Parent-Child" Relationship Indentation defines a parent-child relationship. A for loop is the parent; the code inside is the child. A function is the parent; its instructions are the children. The parent controls when the child executes. If a "child" line is accidentally moved out, it becomes an independent instruction, leading to unexpected (and often dangerous) behavior. Understand the hierarchy, not just the spacing. ➡️ The Tab vs. Spaces Wars (Solved) Stop arguing. Standard professional Python is 4 spaces. Configure your IDE to convert the 'Tab' keypress into 4 spaces immediately. Consistency is non-negotiable, and mixing tabs and spaces is the express lane to an IndentationError headache. Commit to 4 spaces, always. What's one common piece of "obvious" programming advice that you learned the hard way? #Python #Programming #SoftwareDevelopment #CodeQuality #DeveloperMindset #TechTips #ShreyBhardwaj Follow Shrey Bhardwaj for more deep-dive insights and frameworks 😊
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⭐ Everything About OOPs in Python (Zero to Hero Series, Part 2) In this part of the series, we explored core Object-Oriented Programming concepts in the simplest and most relatable way. From understanding how method overriding allows a child class to modify its parent’s behaviour, to learning the different forms of inheritance, we saw how OOP provides structure, clarity, and flexibility to our code. We also broke down polymorphism, encapsulation, and abstraction with real-life examples like remote controls, bank accounts, and family behaviour — making each concept easy to visualise and remember. Together, these four pillars form the heart of OOP. Mastering them builds the foundation for writing cleaner, smarter, and more scalable code in Python. Stay tuned for Part 3, where we move beyond basics into advanced concepts such as dunder methods, classmethod vs staticmethod, OOP best practices, and real-world project examples. If this series is helping you, feel free to share it or connect — your support motivates me to keep writing more Zero-to-Hero content. 🙌 https://lnkd.in/gAqaK8sJ #Python #OOPS #Programming #ObjectOrientedProgramming #Developers #PythonBasics #Coding #Learning #SoftwareEngineering #TechEducation #Beginners #ZeroToHero #PythonProgramming #Inheritance #Polymorphism #Encapsulation #Abstraction #MediumBlog
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💎 The Diamond Problem — A Hidden Thing in Python’s OOP Most of us know about inheritance in Object-Oriented Programming. It’s one of those topics every developer learns early on — a class inherits properties and methods from another, just like a child inheriting traits from parents. Simple enough, right? But there’s one concept many of us don’t talk about often — the Diamond Problem. And interestingly, it’s one of the most common OOP questions in technical interviews. I still remember when I first came across it. I thought I understood inheritance completely — until I saw what happens when a single class inherits from two parent classes, and both of those parents share the same grandparent. It felt like a family argument — both parents telling the child to do the same thing, but in their own way! 😄 This creates what’s known as a diamond-shaped inheritance structure. The confusion begins when both parent classes override a method from the grandparent class, and the child class tries to use that method. Which version should it call? That’s the essence of the Diamond Problem — a moment of ambiguity in multiple inheritance. But Python handles it beautifully using MRO (Method Resolution Order). Instead of getting confused, Python follows a well-defined path — checking classes from left to right — and decides exactly which method to use. That day, I realized inheritance isn’t just about reusing code. It’s about structure, clarity, and understanding how relationships work in a system. The Diamond Problem taught me that even when things look complicated, a clear order and logic can make everything work seamlessly. 💎 #Python #OOP #MultipleInheritance #DevelopersJourney #TechStory #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🐍 5 Built-ins Every Python Professional Should Use Python is packed with powerful built-in functions — yet many people overlook them or forget how much cleaner they can make your code. These aren’t “advanced” features — they’re essentials that separate good code from great code. Here are 5 built-ins every Python professional should use 👇 1️⃣ enumerate() — For indexed loops: Stop using range(len()) — enumerate() gives you both index and value in one clean, readable line. It’s perfect for loops, debugging, and cleaner logic. 2️⃣ zip() — For combining iterables: When you need to pair up two lists (like names and scores), zip() merges them beautifully. It’s efficient, readable, and ideal for building dictionaries or quick lookups. 3️⃣ any() and all() — For logical checks: These two simplify condition checks across a list or iterable: • any() → True if at least one condition is True • all() → True only if every condition is True Perfect for cleaner validation or filtering logic. 4️⃣ sorted() — For simple, powerful sorting: sorted() works on any iterable and supports a key argument — so you can sort lists of strings, dictionaries, or custom objects with ease. Readable and flexible without needing external logic. 5️⃣ sum() — For clean aggregations: Forget manual loops for totals — sum() is concise and readable. It also supports a start value, making it handy for cumulative calculations or adding offsets. 💡 Bonus: min() and max() also accept a key argument — making it easy to find the smallest or largest item based on custom logic. 💡 Mastering Python’s built-ins isn’t just about saving time — it’s about writing code that’s clear, expressive, and professional. 👉 Which of these do you use the most — and which one are you adding to your workflow? #Python #CodingTips #SoftwareEngineering #DataAnalytics #Productivity #Learning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
What if optimizing your Python code could elevate your projects and boost your productivity? 🚀 Code optimization isn't just a technical skill—it's a game plan for success. In a recent article, key strategies were outlined that can help programmers, regardless of their experience level, make their code run more efficiently. By embracing best practices and understanding the real-world implications of performance, you set yourself up for success, ensuring smoother applications and happier users. It’s a great reminder that every line of code contributes to the bigger picture. When we focus on optimization, we not only enhance our work but also unlock new opportunities for collaboration and innovation. Curious to know what methods you’re using to optimize your code? Let’s discuss! 💬 #Python #CodeOptimization #Programming #TechTalk #Innovation https://lnkd.in/gm4kbMDu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stepping Into the World of Python Every new programming language feels like learning a new way to think and now, it’s Python’s turn. After building my foundation with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, I wanted to go deeper to understand logic, automation, and how things work behind the scenes. That’s what led me to Python At first glance, I was amazed by how simple yet powerful Python looks. You can literally say so much with so few lines of code: python name = "Laura" print(f"Hello, {name}! Welcome to Python.") I’m still at the early stage, but I’m already loving how smooth the learning process feels. Each line I write reminds me that growth doesn’t come from comfort, but from curiosity and I’m curious to see where Python takes me next. My goal is to build a solid foundation in Python and explore how it connects to web development. For those who’ve learned Python, what project helped you understand it better? #Python #Programming #CodingJourney #LearnToCode #WebDevelopment #FullStackDeveloper #TechCareer #WomenInTech
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In our latest post in our Python package development blog series, we discuss how to create a package in python, add documentation, testing and publish to PyPI. #datascience #package #development #python
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Hey LinkedIn fam! 👋 Let’s talk Python – it’s no secret that Python is a powerhouse in the coding world, especially as we head into 2025. But while most devs are familiar with staples like NumPy, Pandas, and Flask, there are some seriously underrated libraries that don’t get the spotlight they deserve. Mastering these can truly set you apart and boost your productivity. Here are 5 Python libraries every developer should have on their radar this year: 1. Rich – Amp up your terminal output with pretty formatting, tables, and even progress bars. It makes debugging and logs way more readable. 2. Typer – Building CLI apps? Typer makes it so simple and intuitive to create clean command-line interfaces with minimal code. 3. Pydantic – Perfect for data validation, it helps keep your data models neat and error-free, especially with APIs and configuration files. 4. Poetry – The future of dependency management. Forget about messy requirements.txt files—Poetry streamlines package management and publishing. 5. HTTPX – A modern alternative to Requests, it supports async programming, which is crucial for high-performance apps. Why are these libraries flying under the radar? Maybe because they’re newer or niche. But learning them now can give you a huge edge in building cleaner, faster, and more reliable Python apps. What’s been your experience with underrated tools lately? Any hidden gems you swear by? Let’s share and learn! #Python #SoftwareDevelopment #CodingTips #DeveloperTools #PythonLibraries #TechTrends2025 #Programming #DevCommunity
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
Me prefer golang and python to rustlang 'cuz me too dumb todo rust. Please write a rust translation tool: rust <--> go and rust <--> python ... would be useful and informative. Perhaps it would persuade more folks to consider rust despite its current lack of (shrinking) interest in the commnity.