🧩 An Interesting Problem: Async Dependency Resolver (Frontend + DSA) You’re given a graph of components where each component depends on others. Sounds simple… until you add real-world constraints: Each component is fetched via an async API Dependencies must be resolved before rendering Avoid duplicate API calls Detect cycles (yes, like real systems) Optimize for parallel execution 🔧 Example: A → [B, C] B → [D] C → [D, E] Now imagine each node requires an API call. 👉 Your goal: Build a function that recursively resolves everything and returns a fully structured tree. 💡 The catch? You can’t just “await inside a loop” and call it a day. To solve this properly, you need: DFS (recursion) for dependency traversal Promise.all for parallel execution Memoization (but caching promises, not values) Cycle detection using a visiting set 🧠 What this actually tests: Writing async recursion correctly (rare skill) Understanding how Promises behave under recursion Avoiding waterfall performance issues Thinking in terms of graphs, not arrays ⚡ Bonus (if you really want to level up): Add concurrency limits (only 3 API calls at once) Implement cancellation (AbortController) Render this in React with progressive loading 🔥 Why I like this problem: This is basically what happens under the hood in: Lazy-loaded component trees Microfrontend orchestration Module bundlers Most people can write async/await. Very few can combine it with recursion + caching + correctness. #FrontendDevelopment #JavaScript #AsyncJavaScript #Promises #WebDevelopment #DataStructures #Algorithms #DSA #SoftwareEngineering #SystemDesign #CodingChallenge #InterviewPrep #FrontendEngineer #FullStackDevelopment #ReactJS #PerformanceOptimization #CleanCode #TechLearning #DeveloperSkills
Async Dependency Resolver with DFS and Promise.all
More Relevant Posts
-
I keep seeing the same performance mistake in codebases: 👉 Doing expensive work before basic checks We burn compute… only to exit early. Simple question that changed my mindset: “What is the cost of this line?” Small shift. Big impact. #SoftwareEngineering #Performance #CleanCode
As a Solutions Architect, I review a lot of codebases. And one pattern keeps showing up: 👉 Expensive operations happening before simple validations. Meaning… we do all the heavy work, only to exit early. That’s when I started thinking differently: What is the cost of this line of code? I’ve shared this mindset (with real examples) in my latest blog: https://lnkd.in/djquCpEP It’s a small shift, but it can significantly reduce unnecessary processing. Would love to know if you’ve seen similar patterns in your codebases. #SoftwareEngineering #Performance #JavaScript #CleanCode #TechLeadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗼𝗱𝗲.𝗷𝘀 If you're building production ready backend systems in Node.js, automated testing isn’t optional — it’s your safety net, your confidence booster, and your velocity multiplier. 🔥 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 ♦️ Catch bugs early ♦️ Enable safe refactoring ♦️Ship faster with confidence ♦️ Build production-grade systems ⚒️ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗼𝗱𝗲.𝗷𝘀 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸 Each tool plays a specific role — together they form a powerful testing ecosystem. ⚙️ Test Runner → 𝗠𝗼𝗰𝗵𝗮 🔍 Assertion Library → 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗶 🌐 HTTP Testing → 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 🎭 Mocking/Stubbing → 𝗦𝗶𝗻𝗼𝗻 🌍 HTTP API Mocking → 𝗡𝗼𝗰𝗸 🧩 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗙𝗶𝘁 𝗧𝗼𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 A typical test flow - ⚙️ Mocha runs the test 🔍 Chai validates results 🌐 Supertest tests API endpoints 🎭 Sinon mocks internal dependencies 🌍 Nock mocks external APIs 👉 Together, they help you write - 🧩 Unit tests (functions/class) 🔗 Integration test (APIs) 💡 𝗣𝗿𝗼 𝗧𝗶𝗽 - Integrate this testing workflow in local dev workflow as well as CI pipeline of your services. 👉 We’ll dive deeper into each one of these components in the upcoming posts. Stay tuned!! 🔔 Follow Nitin Kumar for daily valuable insights on LLD, HLD, Distributed Systems and AI. ♻️ Repost to help others in your network. #javascript #nodejs #testing #tdd
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
⚠️ STOP using any in TypeScript. It’s not flexibility… it’s silent technical debt. You’ve written this 👇 let data: any; Looks harmless. Feels fast. But here’s what you actually did: 🧨 You lose type safety — TypeScript stops protecting you. 🧩 You lose IntelliSense — your IDE can’t autocomplete or infer. 🕳️ You lose refactor confidence — renames and changes won’t propagate. 🐛 You gain runtime bugs — errors sneak past compile‑time checks. Using any is like: 🚗 Driving without a seatbelt 🧪 Skipping tests “just for now” 🧱 Removing guardrails from your code It works… until it doesn’t. 🧠 Why We Still Use It Be honest 👇 • “I’ll fix types later” • “API response is messy” • “This is just a quick hack” 👉 That “temporary” any? It never gets removed. ✅ What Senior Devs Do Instead They don’t avoid flexibility. They use safe flexibility 👇 ✔️ unknown → forces validation ✔️ generics <T> → reusable + type-safe ✔️ interface / type → clear data contracts ✔️ Partial<T> → safe optional updates ✔️ Record<K, V> → structured dynamic objects ⚡ Angular Reality Check ❌ Bad: getTickets(): any { return this.http.get('/api/tickets'); } ✅ Good: getTickets(): Observable<Ticket[]> { return this.http.get<Ticket[]>('/api/tickets'); } Now your: ✨ IDE helps you ✨ Compiler protects you ✨ Bugs get caught early 🧩 Golden Rule 👉 If you use any, you’re telling TypeScript: “Don’t help me. I’ll debug in production.” Where have you seen any create real problems? (or are you still using it 👀) 👇 Drop your experience 🔖 Save this before your next refactor #Angular #TypeScript #Frontend #CleanCode #WebDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #JavaScript #DevCommunity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
We had a bug in production where UI was showing outdated data. No errors. No crashes. Just incorrect information. Here’s what happened 👇 Problem: → Users saw stale data after updates → UI didn’t reflect latest API response Root cause: ✖ Derived state stored separately ✖ Not synced with original data ✖ Multiple sources of truth What I changed: ✔ Removed stored derived state ✔ Computed values directly from source ✔ Used memoization only where needed Result: → Consistent UI → No stale data issues → Simplified logic Key insight: If something can be derived… Don’t store it. That’s how subtle bugs enter systems. #ReactJS #Debugging #Frontend #SoftwareEngineering #CaseStudy #JavaScript #StateManagement #Engineering #Programming #Tech
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Small JavaScript bugs keep escaping to production and breaking critical user flows. Debugging inconsistent runtime behavior steals time from feature delivery. ────────────────────────────── Record Type for Object Maps TypeScript catches type mismatches during development before runtime. #typescript #record #maps #objects ────────────────────────────── Core Concept TypeScript catches type mismatches during development before runtime. Key Rules • Use strict mode and avoid any in business logic. • Model API responses with exact interfaces. • Use unknown at boundaries, then narrow deliberately. 💡 Try This type Status = 'open' | 'closed'; function isOpen(s: Status) { return s === 'open'; } console.log(isOpen('open')); ❓ Quick Quiz Q: When should unknown be preferred over any? A: At external boundaries where validation and narrowing are required. 🔑 Key Takeaway Strong typing turns refactors from risky guesswork into confident change.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Small JavaScript bugs keep escaping to production and breaking critical user flows. Debugging inconsistent runtime behavior steals time from feature delivery. ────────────────────────────── Discriminated Unions Pattern TypeScript catches type mismatches during development before runtime. #typescript #discriminated #unions #patterns ────────────────────────────── Core Concept TypeScript catches type mismatches during development before runtime. Key Rules • Use strict mode and avoid any in business logic. • Model API responses with exact interfaces. • Use unknown at boundaries, then narrow deliberately. 💡 Try This type Status = 'open' | 'closed'; function isOpen(s: Status) { return s === 'open'; } console.log(isOpen('open')); ❓ Quick Quiz Q: When should unknown be preferred over any? A: At external boundaries where validation and narrowing are required. 🔑 Key Takeaway Strong typing turns refactors from risky guesswork into confident change.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Did you know 76% of developers struggle with maintaining type safety across a full-stack TypeScript application using tRPC? Here's how you can master it. 1. Use tRPC to connect your client and server without REST or GraphQL. This cuts your boilerplate code dramatically and keeps types in sync. 2. Build your API procedures in a way that leverages TypeScript's powerful type inference. Less manual type annotation means fewer errors. 3. Avoid the common pitfall of skipping input validation. Even with TypeScript, ensure you validate inputs to catch runtime errors early. 4. Try using vibe coding to rapidly prototype your tRPC endpoints. This method keeps you in the flow and speeds up development. 5. Experiment with advanced TypeScript features like mapped types and conditional types for even more robust type safety. 6. Integrate AI-assisted development into your workflow to automate repetitive tasks. I've found this significantly increases my productivity. 7. Maintain a lean data transfer by defining precise types for your API responses. This optimizes both performance and clarity. How do you ensure type safety across your full-stack applications? Share your approach below! ```typescript import { initTRPC } from '@trpc/server'; const t = initTRPC.create(); const appRouter = t.router({ getUser: t.procedure.query(() => { return { id: 1, name: 'John Doe' }; }), }); type AppRouter = typeof appRouter; ```" #WebDevelopment #TypeScript #Frontend #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🧠 Promises made async code better… But Async/Await made it feel like synchronous code. 🔹 What is Async/Await? - It’s a cleaner way to write Promises. - async → makes a function return a Promise - await → pauses execution until the Promise resolves 🔹 Example (Without Async/Await) fetch("api/data") .then((res) => res.json()) .then((data) => console.log(data)) .catch((err) => console.log(err)); 🔹 Same Example (With Async/Await) async function getData() { try { const res = await fetch("api/data"); const data = await res.json(); console.log(data); } catch (err) { console.log(err); } } 🔹 Why Async/Await? ✅ Cleaner & more readable ✅ Looks like normal (sync) code ✅ Easier error handling with try...catch 💡 Key Idea - Async/Await is just syntactic sugar over Promises. 🚀 Takeaway - async returns a Promise - await waits for it - Makes async code simple & readable Next post: Fetch API Explained Simply 🌐 #JavaScript #AsyncAwait #Promises #Frontend #WebDevelopment #LearnJS #Programming #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Derived state is one of the most subtle sources of bugs. Because it “looks correct”. Until it isn’t. Here’s the issue 👇 You store: → Original data → Derived data (filtered, sorted, computed) Now you have: ❌ Two sources of truth Over time: → They go out of sync → Bugs appear → Debugging becomes painful Example: → items → filteredItems If items update but filteredItems doesn’t… Your UI lies. What works: ✔ Derive data on render (not store it) ✔ Use memoization if expensive ✔ Keep single source of truth Key insight: If something can be derived… It shouldn’t be stored. That’s how you avoid state inconsistency bugs. #ReactJS #StateManagement #Frontend #SoftwareEngineering #JavaScript #AdvancedReact #Architecture #Engineering #Programming #CleanCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Are You Using Hooks or Misusing Them? Hooks made React cleaner but only if you respect the rules. In production environments, most bugs don't stem from complex business logic; they stem from subtle anti-patterns that degrade performance and scalability. If you’re aiming for senior-level code, here are the patterns you should stop today: ⚠️ 1. The useEffect Crutch If a value can be computed during render, it doesn’t belong in an effect. Effects are for synchronization with external systems, not for transforming data. Overusing them leads to unnecessary re-renders and "race condition" bugs. ⚠️ 2. Suppressing Dependency Arrays Disabling ESLint warnings is like ignoring a "Check Engine" light. If including a dependency breaks your logic, your logic is flawed, not the rule. Fix the stale closure; don't hide it. ⚠️ 3. Storing Derived State Storing data in useState that can be calculated from props or other state variables is a recipe for sync issues. Always maintain a Single Source of Truth. ⚠️ 4. Abstraction Fatigue (Custom Hook Overkill) Not every 3-line logic block needs a custom hook. Premature abstraction often makes code harder to follow than simple, localized duplication. Abstract for reusability, not just for "cleaner" looking files. ⚠️ 5. Using Hooks to Mask Architectural Debt Hooks are powerful, but they won't fix a poorly structured component tree. Clean architecture > "Clever" hook implementations. 💡 Senior Dev Mindset: Hooks are not just features; they are constraints that enforce predictable behavior. If your React codebase feels "fragile," it’s rarely a React problem it's usually a Hook implementation problem. 💬 Curious to hear from the community: Which of these "subtle" bugs have you spent the most time debugging lately? #ReactJS #FrontendArchitecture #WebDevelopment #JavaScript #SoftwareEngineering #CleanCode #ReactHooks #SeniorDeveloper #CodeQuality #ProgrammingTips
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development