Bun 1.3 just deleted 47 npm packages from my package.json — and dropped my Lambda cold start from 2.1s to 380ms. [ Bun 1.3 — The Dependency Massacre Cheat Sheet ] What got killed in one runtime upgrade: → better-sqlite3 → bun:sqlite (3-6x faster) → ioredis → Bun.redis (~2.5x throughput, built on hiredis) → @aws-sdk/client-s3 → Bun.s3 (zero-config, native presigned URLs) → dotenv → native .env loader → ws → built-in WebSocket server → node-fetch → native fetch → vitest → built-in test runner (3x faster cold runs) → vite → routes-based fullstack dev server The numbers that matter: AWS Lambda arm64, 512MB. Swapped @aws-sdk/client-s3 (14MB unzipped, 280+ transitive deps) for Bun.s3. Cold start: 2.1s → 380ms. An 82% drop. Why? The SDK's transitive deps never get parsed. They never existed. bun install on a clean Next.js starter: 2.1s. npm install: 53s. That's 25x. node:* compatibility now passes 95%+ of the Node test suite. The migration friction that killed Deno enterprise adoption? Gone. But here's the senior-engineer test: bun:sqlite uses a custom C binding that bypasses sqlite3_open_v2 VFS hooks. Which means LiteFS and Litestream silently break. If you're running multi-region SQLite on Fly.io and you migrate without checking your replication layer, your writes will look fine in dev and quietly diverge in prod. Fall back to better-sqlite3 for those workloads, or move to Turso/libSQL. The real story isn't speed. It's that every Solution Architect defending a 200-dependency Node service to security and FinOps just got a one-line answer: rip them out. Supply-chain risk, cold start tax, CVE surface — all of it collapses when SQLite, Redis, S3, env, and WebSockets are runtime primitives instead of community packages maintained by 3 people on weekends. Native isn't free. But it's a lot cheaper than the audit you're failing right now. If you found this helpful, repost — it might save someone a 3am incident. #Bun #NodeJS #JavaScript #SolutionArchitect #DevOps
Bun 1.3 Cuts 47 npm Packages, Lambda Cold Start Drops 82%
More Relevant Posts
-
Pod crashed at 3 AM. With raw YAML, I spent 40 minutes finding which ConfigMap was wrong. With Helm, I found it in 30 seconds. I deployed the same microservices platform twice — AWS EKS (raw manifests) vs Azure AKS (Helm chart). The debugging experience was night and day. ❌ The Debugging Nightmare with Raw YAML: • MongoDB OOMKilled → Which file has the memory limits? • Frontend permission denied → Is it the Deployment or ConfigMap? • Service selector mismatch → Check 3 files to verify label consistency • "Which version is running?" → No single source of truth • Rollback = Git checkout + manual kubectl apply + hope you remember what changed ✅ The Helm Debugging Experience: • helm get values myapp → See entire config in one output • helm history myapp → See every deployment with timestamps • helm rollback myapp 3 → Instant recovery to known-good state • helm template . --debug → Catch errors before deployment • Labels auto-generated from templates → Impossible to mismatch 📊 Real Incident Response Times: Scenario: MongoDB Memory Limit Too Low (OOMKilled) Raw YAML approach (EKS): 1. Check pod status (2 min) 2. Find mongodb.yaml file in folder structure (5 min) 3. Locate resources section (3 min) 4. Edit, apply, verify (8 min) Total: ~18 minutes Helm approach (AKS): 1. Check pod status (2 min) 2. helm get values myapp → See mongodb.resources.limits.memory: 200Mi (30 seconds) 3. Edit values.yaml, helm upgrade myapp . (2 min) Total: ~5 minutes 🔧 How Helm Saved Me During Real Production Issues: Issue 1: Frontend CrashLoopBackOff (nginx port 80 permission denied) Helm approach - trace the problem: → helm get values myapp | grep -A 5 frontend → Found: containerPort: 80 (requires root) → Fixed: values.yaml → containerPort: 8080 → Deploy: helm upgrade myapp . → Time: 3 minutes Issue 2: Label Selector Mismatch (Services not finding Pods) Raw YAML: Labels defined in 3 places: • Deployment.spec.selector.matchLabels • Deployment.spec.template.metadata.labels • Service.spec.selector Result: Easy to mismatch, hard to debug Helm: Labels from _helpers.tpl: {{ include "myapp.selectorLabels" . }} Result: Impossible to mismatch, single source of truth Issue 3: Rollback After Bad Config Raw YAML: Git revert + kubectl apply (manual, error-prone) Helm: helm rollback myapp 2 (atomic, tested) 💡 Key insight: The biggest reliability win wasn't during deployment — it was during incident response at 2 AM. When you're sleep-deprived and production is down, helm history + helm rollback is the difference between 5-minute recovery and 45-minute panic. Real example from last week: Accidentally set MongoDB memory to 512M instead of 512Mi. Pod crashed. With Helm revision history, I saw exactly what changed between revision 3 (working) and revision 4 (broken). Rollback took one command. #Kubernetes #SRE #Helm #DevOps #IncidentResponse #ProductionReady #AzureAKS
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Just leveled up my URL Shortener project with real backend optimizations Most URL shortener projects stop at basic CRUD… but I wanted to go deeper. So I worked on improving performance and scalability: ⚡ Added Redis caching → Frequently accessed URLs are now served directly from cache → Reduced database hits significantly 🐳 Dockerized the entire setup → App + Redis running in isolated containers → Consistent environment, easier deployment 🛠 Fixed real-world issues → Handled native module errors (better-sqlite3) inside Docker → Learned how environment differences actually break production systems 📈 Result: Faster redirects, cleaner architecture, and a more production-ready backend This project taught me something important: Building features is easy. Optimizing them is where real engineering starts. Next step: adding analytics + rate limiting 👀 #WebDevelopment #BackendDevelopment #Nodejs #Redis #Docker #FullStack #Projects #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Shipped a production-grade URL Shortener — from code to AWS in one push. Not just another "Hello World" API. This one's fully containerised, auto-deployed, and live on AWS right now. 🔗 Live demo → https://lnkd.in/gnxQwDJN ⚙️ GitHub → https://lnkd.in/gaASvhAE --- Here's what the stack looks like under the hood: ⚡ Spring Boot 3 + Java 21 — REST API with two clean endpoints: shorten a URL and redirect via slug 🗄️ PostgreSQL — Stores every slug-to-URL mapping with optional expiry timestamps 🔴 Redis (cache-aside pattern) — Every redirect checks Redis first. Cache hit = sub-millisecond response. Cache miss = PostgreSQL fallback + re-cache. No cache invalidation headaches. 🐳 Docker + Docker Compose — Three containers (app, Postgres, Redis) with health-check-gated startup. The app only starts after both dependencies pass their health checks. Zero race conditions. 🔁 GitHub Actions CI/CD — Every push to main triggers: → Unit tests (JUnit 5 + Mockito) — must pass to continue → Multi-stage Docker image build → Trivy vulnerability scan (CVE check before anything ships) → Push to AWS ECR (tagged with commit SHA) → Rolling deploy to AWS ECS Fargate → Wait for deployment stability ☁️ AWS ECS Fargate — Serverless containers sitting behind an Application Load Balancer, inside a custom VPC with properly scoped security groups. IAM least-privilege throughout. 🎨 Frontend — Pure HTML/CSS/JS with a dark dev aesthetic, deployed on Vercel. History persisted in localStorage, one-click copy, live API indicator. #Java #SpringBoot #AWS #Docker #DevOps #CICD #Redis #PostgreSQL #BackendDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #CloudComputing #ECS #GitHubActions #SystemDesign #OpenToWork #BuildInPublic #JavaDeveloper #BackendEngineering #SoftwareArchitecture #TechCareers #WebDevelopment #Microservices #SDE
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Started this as a weekend thing. I wanted a rate limiter that actually fit how I build Node APIs: TypeScript, the frameworks I use day to day, and real stores once you're past localhost. Wasn't trying to publish anything. Just wanted to learn by building. What changed the shape of the project was how I used AI. Not as a code vending machine, but as someone to think out loud with. We'd sketch the API, I'd argue about edge cases, we'd rewrite the parts that felt off, add tests, kept going. The boring scaffolding got quick. The harder stuff got the attention it actually needed: distributed limits, what happens when Redis goes down, getting metrics out without baking in a specific vendor. That weekend thing is now ratelimit-flex. It plugs into Express, Fastify, NestJS, and Hono. Backed it with Redis, Postgres, Mongo, DynamoDB, or keep it in-memory for dev. Sliding window, token bucket, fixed window. Hooks for metrics and a few resilience patterns I kept reaching for at work. I don't think "AI wrote it" is the interesting part. The interesting part is that a clear idea, the patience to sit with the hard problems, and AI handling the grunt work can take a weekend curiosity and land it somewhere you'd actually trust next to production traffic. If you're writing APIs in TypeScript, I'd love eyes on it. And honestly, tell me what breaks: 🔗 https://lnkd.in/gFRjDUWq 🔗 https://lnkd.in/g4guDyEz #OpenSource #TypeScript #NodeJS #API #Ratelimiter
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
There is a specific kind of bug that makes you question your sanity as a backend dev. It’s the one that works flawlessly on your local machine, but the moment you deploy to staging, a random microservice just... dies. Recently, we were spinning up a 10-service backend (NestJS, RabbitMQ, PostgreSQL) and kept encountering these "ghost crashes." Randomly, the Auth or Operations service would exit with code 1 during deployment. The logs were infuriatingly generic: `ECONNREFUSED - RabbitMQ connection failed.` But when you manually restarted the crashed pod, it spun up perfectly fine. What gives? For a whole day, we blamed infrastructure. We thought it was a Docker networking issue. We thought the RabbitMQ container was taking too long to accept connections. Someone even threw in the classic "Band-Aid": an arbitrary 5-second `setTimeout` before connecting. (We’ve all been there). But the bug kept coming back. After digging into the stack trace, we finally found the culprit. It wasn’t the network. It was the framework. Specifically, a Dependency Injection race condition. NestJS (and many other heavy frameworks) relies heavily on dynamic injection. We were heavily using the built-in `ConfigModule` to parse our `.env` files. But because module instantiation happens asynchronously, the `RabbitMQClient` provider was trying to establish a connection *while* the `ConfigService` was still busy parsing the environment variables from disk. On local machines, disk I/O is so fast that the internal `.env` parse always won the race. On a heavily strained staging server, the network connection fired a millisecond too early. Result? It tried to connect with an `undefined` host string and crashed. We initially tried fixing it "the framework way" by chaining massive asynchronous `useFactory` arrays. It turned our module imports into an unreadable mess. So, we stepped back and did the "dumb" thing, which ended up being the right thing. We ripped the core configuration out of the dependency injection container entirely. We built a static `CONFIG` singleton that synchronously validates and loads the environment variables on Line 1 of `main.ts`—before `NestFactory.create()` is even called. It’s completely outside the framework. It’s aggressively simple. And it means the moment the framework starts booting up, every connection string is already locked in memory. Since that change, we haven't had a single bootstrap failure. Sometimes the biggest lesson in using powerful, complex frameworks is knowing exactly when to step outside of them and go back to basics. If you've ever spent days debugging infrastructure only to realize it was a code timing issue, I'd love to hear about it.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AuthN and AuthZ project update 🔐📈 I approached this project through a structured roadmap. I broke the complexity down into strategic milestones to go from zero to a fully functional Auth system. Project Link: https://lnkd.in/gfh4gDgV Milestone 1 -- Infrastructure 👷🏽♂️ Goal was to get Postgres and Redis running locally. Establish DB connection. and Run migrations. Files I created > docker-compose.yml: Runs Postgres + Redis as containers. Single command startup. > .env | Local environment variables. Git-ignored. > src/db/postgres.js | Creates and exports the pg connection pool. > src/db/redis.js | Creates and exports the ioredis client. > src/app.js Express app setup. > server.js Entry point. Imports app, starts server on PORT. > env.js | Load dotenv. Read each variable. If any required variable is missing or empty, throw an error immediately with a clear message. > Migrations files path(src/db) users table schema, refresh_tokens table schema, audit_logs table schema, Performance indexes on all lookup columns. > src/db/migrate.js | Read all .sql files from the migrations folder in order. > Dependencies: express pg, ioredis, bcrypt, jsonwebtoken, dotenv, uuid pino, pino-http, pino-pretty > Dev Dependencies: Nodemon, jest, supertest Verification > docker compose up -d > node src/db/migrate.js | should print each migration name with no errors > node server.js #Authentication #BackendEngineering #Docker #NodeJS #Express #Postgres #Redis
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🐳 Containerizing Node.js just got a whole lot clearer. I just published a new article in my Docker Zero to Hero series — and this one covers everything students always get stuck on: ✅ Writing a production-aware Dockerfile for Express ✅ The layer caching trick that speeds up every build ✅ Nodemon hot reload inside Docker (no rebuilds!) ✅ Docker Compose with MongoDB — full working setup ✅ The double-volume pattern that everyone gets wrong If you've ever typed `docker run` and immediately regretted it, this one's for you. 😄 Built for beginners. Packed with real explanations — not just copy-paste commands. 👇 Read it here: https://lnkd.in/gxPXfzhn #Docker #NodeJS #ExpressJS #MongoDB #DockerCompose #Nodemon #Containerization #BackendDevelopment #DevOps #DockerZeroToHero
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I have spent the past few days diving deep into distributed systems, and I just hit a major milestone. As a full-stack developer, I have done a massive amount of frontend work recently. While I already consider myself a strong backend engineer, I wanted to double down, focus more heavily on the server side of my stack, and really push the limits of my architectural knowledge. To do that, I decided to build a custom, enterprise-grade API Gateway from the ground up using Node.js, Express, Redis, and PostgreSQL. Most people rely on managed services or heavy third-party packages for API routing, but I wanted to understand exactly how the plumbing works under the hood. Building this from scratch has completely changed how I approach backend architecture. Here is what the Gateway handles so far: 1. O(1) Dynamic Routing: The core proxy engine routes traffic using an in-memory Map, ensuring absolute minimal latency before hitting the upstream microservices. 2. Zero-Downtime Hot Reloading: I implemented PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY. When a route configuration is updated in the database, the Gateway listens for the trigger and hot-reloads its routing table in real time without dropping a single HTTP request. 3. Atomic Rate Limiting: Built a sliding window rate limiter backed by Redis. To prevent race conditions under heavy concurrent traffic, the time-window logic is handled entirely inside an atomic Lua script. 4. Distributed Circuit Breakers: This was the hardest but most rewarding part. The gateway monitors upstream microservices. If a service crashes, the Gateway trips the breaker to OPEN and blocks traffic with a 503 to give the server time to heal. After a cooldown, it uses a Redis SET NX lock to let a single Half-Open probe request through to test the waters before restoring full traffic. What is next on the roadmap? Right now, the core engine is bulletproof. The next phase is moving security to the edge by adding a JWT Authentication layer directly in the Gateway. After that, I will be building a Next.js control dashboard to visualize traffic and toggle circuit breakers in real time. If you are working on distributed systems or scaling backend architectures, I would love to connect and hear how you handle upstream failures! #NodeJS #BackendEngineering #Redis #PostgreSQL #APIGateway #SoftwareArchitecture #Microservices #TypeScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
After shipping my 4th Node.js service this year, I realized I was doing the same thing every single time: Install winston (or pino) → add rotation plugin → add DB transport plugin → build request tracing manually → discover it blocks the event loop under load → rewrite. So I spent a few weekends building what I actually wanted: a logger that ships complete. Meet logixia — a TypeScript-first logging library for Node.js that includes: → Console + file rotation → Database transports (Postgres, MongoDB, MySQL) → Cloud adapters (AWS CloudWatch, GCP, Azure Monitor) → Request tracing with W3C trace context → NestJS module with decorators → OpenTelemetry support (zero extra deps) → Built-in log search → Non-blocking on every transport One install. No plugin hunt. Full TypeScript types. MIT licensed. If you're building backend services in Node.js or NestJS, I'd love your honest feedback. npm: https://lnkd.in/gri8rh2p GitHub: https://lnkd.in/g8KgJEkK #nodejs #typescript #opensource #nestjs #observability
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The common approach for background tasks in Django typically involves using Redis and Celery. However, it's important to remember that defaults are habits, not strict requirements. In a recent Django API project, a different solution was implemented by using Postgres as the task queue, utilizing a concurrency primitive known as SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED—something many developers overlook. This approach features: - A single table for the queue - Atomic job claims by workers - Built-in retries, scheduling, and concurrency control As a result, the docker-compose setup was simplified from four services to just two. Is this method suitable for every project? Not necessarily. However, for many Django applications focused on I/O-bound background tasks, it proves to be more than adequate. The entire journey was documented, detailing the reasons, methods, and scenarios where this approach may not be ideal. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/dyhwBQaU
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development