𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗶𝘀 “𝘄𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲” 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲-𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀. It’s not. You’re just misunderstanding how it works. When state updates in a parent: The parent re-renders All children re-render (yes, even the ones not using that state) And people say: “Why doesn’t React just skip unnecessary re-renders by default?” Because that would break more things than it fixes. React would need to: Track exactly which component depends on which state Compare props deeply on every render Predict output without running the component That’s expensive. And sometimes more costly than just re-rendering. So React takes a different approach: Re-run everything (cheap JS work) Update only what actually changed (DOM optimization) That’s called reconciliation — and it works. If you want to skip re-renders: Use React.memo Keep props stable Optimize only where it actually matters Not every re-render is a problem. Unnecessary complexity is. Most performance issues in React don’t come from re-renders… They come from poor architecture and premature optimization. #ReactJS #FrontendDevelopment #WebDevelopment #JavaScript #SoftwareEngineering #ReactPerformance #CleanCode #FrontendArchitecture #ProgrammingTips #DevMindset #TechLeadership #CodingBestPractices #ReactMemo #PerformanceOptimization #LearnToCode
Hamza Maqbool’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
🚀 Stop Managing State Manually — Let React Do the Heavy Lifting For a long time in React (especially React 17/18), handling form submissions meant writing extra logic: managing loading state, preventing default behavior, handling async calls manually… and repeating this pattern again and again. It worked — but it wasn’t elegant. Now with React 19, things are changing in a powerful way. ✨ With hooks like useActionState, React introduces a more declarative and streamlined approach: No more manual loading state management No need for repetitive event handling Cleaner and more readable components Built-in handling of async actions Instead of telling React how to handle everything step-by-step, we now focus on what we want — and let React take care of the rest. 👉 This shift is not just about writing less code. It’s about writing better code. Code that is: ✔ Easier to maintain ✔ Less error-prone ✔ More scalable ✔ More aligned with modern frontend architecture As developers, growth comes from unlearning old patterns and embracing better ones. 💡 The real question is: Are we just writing code that works… or are we writing code that evolves? #React19 #FrontendDevelopment #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #CleanCode #CodingJourney #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most React performance advice is wrong. Not because the patterns are bad but because developers apply them without understanding what React is actually doing. Here’s what I’ve learned: React.memo without useCallback is just theater. memo tells React: “Only re-render if prop references change.” But if you pass a new function reference on every render, memo does absolutely nothing. // ❌ Kills memo on every render <ProductCard onSelect={(id) => handleSelect(id)} /> // ✅ Actually works const handleSelect = useCallback((id) => { dispatch({ type: "SELECT", payload: id }); }, [dispatch]); useMemo has a cost use it surgically. React still performs dependency comparison on every render. For cheap computations, the memoization overhead can be higher than simply recalculating. Use useMemo only when: the computation is genuinely expensive the result is passed to a memoized child you’ve measured it, not assumed it Before reaching for memo or useMemo, ask: What is actually triggering the re-render? Can you eliminate the trigger instead of memoizing around it? Structural state changes beat memoization every time. What’s the nastiest React performance bug you’ve hit in production? #React #ReactJS #Frontend #TypeScript #WebDevelopment #MERN #JavaScript #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Crack the Code: The React Lifecycle (Core Level) Ever wondered how React actually manages the life of a component? Whether you’re prepping for a Senior Dev interview or just trying to squash that persistent memory leak, mastering the Lifecycle Phases is your secret weapon. 🛠️ React components are like living organisms: they are born, they grow, and they eventually pass away. 1️⃣ The Birth: Mounting Phase This is where it all begins. React initializes state and builds the initial Virtual DOM. The Hook: useEffect(() => { ... }, []) Pro Tip: Use this phase for initial API calls or setting up subscriptions. If you leave the dependency array empty, it runs exactly once—like a birth certificate! 2️⃣ The Growth: Updating Phase Whenever props or state change, React springs into action. This is where the magic of Diffing happens—React compares the old Virtual DOM with the new one to update only what’s necessary. The Hook: useEffect(() => { ... }, [dependency]) Pro Tip: Always be intentional with your dependency array. Missing a dependency can lead to stale data; adding too many can cause infinite loops! 🔄 3️⃣ The End: Unmounting Phase The most ignored phase, but arguably the most critical for performance. 🧹 The Hook: The Cleanup Function inside useEffect. Why it matters: If you don't clear your setInterval or unsubscribe from a socket here, you’re inviting memory leaks to crash your party. 💡 The "Core Level" Secret: Render vs. Commit To keep your apps buttery smooth, React splits work into two internal phases: Render Phase: Pure calculation. React figures out what changed. It can pause or restart this work if a higher-priority task comes in. Commit Phase: This is where React actually touches the Real DOM. It’s fast, synchronous, and happens in one go. 🧠 The Mental Model Shift In modern React, stop thinking about "methods" and start thinking about Synchronization. useEffect isn't just a lifecycle hook—it’s a tool to synchronize your component with an external system (the API, the DOM, or a Window event). Are you building for performance or just for functionality? Let's discuss in the comments! 👇 #ReactJS #WebDevelopment #FrontendEngineers #CodingTips #JavaScript #SoftwareArchitecture
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
React vs. Redux vs. Redux Toolkit: Which should you use? "Do I need Redux?" is still one of the most common questions in frontend development. State management can be overwhelming, but understanding the evolution of these tools makes the choice much clearer. Here is a straightforward breakdown of the big three: 1️⃣ React State & Context (The Foundation) React’s built-in hooks (useState, useReducer, useContext) are often all you need. The Good: Zero extra dependencies. It is perfect for local component state (like form inputs or UI toggles) and low-frequency global state (like user themes or auth status). The Bad: Relying purely on Context for high-frequency, complex global state can lead to unnecessary re-renders and messy prop-drilling. 2️⃣ Classic Redux (The Legacy Heavyweight) Redux revolutionized how we handle global state by introducing a single, predictable source of truth. The Good: Unmatched predictability and incredible developer tools (time-travel debugging is magic). The Bad: The boilerplate. Writing separate files for actions, action types, and reducers slows down development and frustrates teams. 3️⃣ Redux Toolkit / RTK (The Modern Standard) Redux Toolkit is not a replacement for Redux; it is the official, modern way to write it. It takes everything great about Redux and strips away the pain points. The Good: It drastically reduces boilerplate. Features like createSlice automatically generate your actions and reducers. It includes Immer under the hood (allowing you to write simpler, "mutating" logic that updates state immutably), and it ships with RTK Query for incredibly efficient data fetching and caching. The Verdict: If you are starting a new project that genuinely needs Redux, RTK is the only way you should be writing it. 💡 My Rule of Thumb: Start simple. Build with React's built-in state. When your state starts feeling tangled, difficult to track, or requires passing props through five layers of components (Prop Drilling)—it's time to bring in Redux Toolkit. How is your team handling state management these days? Are you firmly on team RTK, or have you pivoted to lighter alternatives like Zustand or Jotai? Let's discuss in the comments! 👇 #ReactJS #Redux #WebDevelopment #Frontend #SoftwareEngineering #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Controlled vs Uncontrolled Components in React — Real-World Perspective Most developers learn: 👉 Controlled = React state 👉 Uncontrolled = DOM refs But in real applications… 👉 The choice impacts performance, scalability, and maintainability. 💡 Quick Recap 🔹 Controlled Components: Managed by React state Re-render on every input change 🔹 Uncontrolled Components: Managed by the DOM Accessed via refs ⚙️ The Real Problem In large forms: ❌ Controlled inputs → Too many re-renders ❌ Uncontrolled inputs → Hard to validate & manage 👉 So which one should you use? 🧠 Real-world Decision Rule 👉 Use Controlled when: ✔ You need validation ✔ UI depends on input ✔ Dynamic form logic exists 👉 Use Uncontrolled when: ✔ Performance is critical ✔ Minimal validation needed ✔ Simple forms 🔥 Performance Insight Controlled input: <input value={name} onChange={(e) => setName(e.target.value)} /> 👉 Re-renders on every keystroke Uncontrolled input: <input ref={inputRef} /> 👉 No re-render → better performance ⚠️ Advanced Problem (Most devs miss this) 👉 Large forms with 20+ fields Controlled approach: ❌ Can slow down typing 👉 Solution: ✔ Hybrid approach ✔ Use libraries (React Hook Form) 🧩 Industry Pattern Modern apps often use: 👉 Controlled logic + Uncontrolled inputs internally Example: ✔ React Hook Form ✔ Formik (optimized patterns) 🔥 Best Practices ✅ Use controlled for logic-heavy forms ✅ Use uncontrolled for performance-critical inputs ✅ Consider form libraries for scalability ❌ Don’t blindly use controlled everywhere 💬 Pro Insight (Senior Thinking) 👉 This is not about “which is better” 👉 It’s about choosing the right tool for the problem 📌 Save this post & follow for more deep frontend insights! 📅 Day 17/100 #ReactJS #FrontendDevelopment #JavaScript #ReactHooks #PerformanceOptimization #SoftwareEngineering #100DaysOfCode 🚀
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I made React slower trying to optimize it. Wrapped everything in useMemo. Added useCallback everywhere. Felt productive. Performance got worse. Here's what I didn't understand about re-renders 👇 4 things that trigger a re-render: > State change > Prop change > Parent re-renders (even if YOUR props didn't change) > Context update That third one is responsible of unnecessary re-renders I've seen in real codebases. The fix isn't memorizing APIs. It's this order: 1. Profile first Open React DevTools Profiler. Find the actual problem. Takes 2 minutes. 2. Wrap the right components in React.memo Not all of them. Only components that are expensive AND receive stable props. 3. Stabilise your functions with useCallback Without it - new function reference every render --> child always re-renders. Doesn't matter if you have React.memo. 4. useMemo for heavy calculations only Not for "this array map looks expensive." Only when Profiler proves it. The rule I follow now: Don't optimise what you haven't measured. One change in the right place beats 10 changes in the wrong ones. What's the most unnecessary useMemo you've ever written? 😄 #React #JavaScript #Frontend #WebDev
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
You wrapped your component in React.memo… but it still re-renders 🤔 I ran into this more times than I’d like to admit. Everything looks correct. You’re using React.memo. Props don’t seem to change. But the component still re-renders on every parent update. Here’s a simple example: const List = React.memo(({ items }) => { console.log('List render'); return items.map(item => ( <div key={item.id}>{item.name}</div> )); }); function App() { const [count, setCount] = React.useState(0); const items = [{ id: 1, name: 'A' }]; return ( <> <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}> Click </button> <List items={items} /> </> ); } When you click the button the List still re-renders. At first glance, it feels wrong. The data didn’t change… so why did React re-render? The reason is subtle but important: every render creates a new array. So even though the content is the same, the reference is different. [] !== [] And React.memo only does a shallow comparison. So from React’s perspective, the prop did change. One simple fix: const items = React.useMemo(() => [ { id: 1, name: 'A' } ], []); Now the reference stays stable and memoization actually works. Takeaway React.memo is not magic. It only helps if the props you pass are stable. If you create new objects or functions on every render, you’re effectively disabling it without realizing it. This is one of those bugs that doesn’t throw errors… but quietly hurts performance. Have you ever debugged something like this? 👀 #reactjs #javascript #frontend #webdevelopment #performance #reactperformance #softwareengineering #programming #coding #webdev #react #typescript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
React System Design – Day 10: Hooks and Their Rules Hooks are the backbone of modern React development. They let us write cleaner, more reusable, and more functional code. But with great power comes great responsibility — and React enforces some strict rules to keep things predictable. The Two Golden Rules of Hooks Only call Hooks at the top level Don’t call them inside loops, conditions, or nested functions. This ensures React can preserve the correct state across re-renders. Only call Hooks from React functions Hooks must be used inside functional components or custom Hooks. Never call them in regular JS functions or class components. Why These Rules Matter They guarantee consistent order of execution. They prevent bugs where state or effects get mismatched. They make debugging and reasoning about components much easier. Commonly Used Hooks useState → Manage local state useEffect → Handle side effects useContext → Share data without prop drilling useReducer → Complex state management useMemo & useCallback → Performance optimizations Takeaway: Mastering Hooks isn’t just about knowing them — it’s about respecting their rules. That’s what makes React apps scalable and maintainable. #React #SystemDesign #Frontend #Hooks #JavaScript #WebDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Just checked out Vite 8 + AI… and honestly, it feels crazy fast. At first, I used to think Vite was just another dev server. But after exploring it more, it’s actually way more powerful. Here are a few things I noticed 👇 ⚡ Builds feel much faster — even big projects start quickly 🧠 Dependency handling seems smoother (less random issues 😅) 📦 SSR support is better now, which is pretty cool 🔌 Plugins are improving and easier to work with 🛠️ Overall dev experience feels cleaner and less frustrating 💻 One thing I really liked: Frontend errors now show directly in the VS Code terminal (Browser Forward Console). Earlier I had to check the browser console, but now everything is in one place — makes debugging much easier. 📂 Also, TypeScript path aliases are supported better now. No more messy imports like ../../components — cleaner and easier to manage. 💭 What I liked the most: Hot reload + fast builds = less waiting, more coding. Still exploring it, but Vite 8 definitely feels like a solid upgrade. If you're working with React, Vue, or modern JS — you might want to give it a try. Has anyone else tried Vite 8 yet? What do you think? #Vite #Frontend #JavaScript #WebDev #React #Vue
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🔥 React DevTools: Common Issues & How to Use It Effectively React DevTools is one of the most powerful tools for diagnosing performance issues… but many developers don’t use it correctly. Here’s what I’ve learned 👇 ------------------------------------- 🔍 Common Issues Developers Face: 1️⃣ Not Profiling – Many just inspect components without measuring re-renders or performance. 2️⃣ Ignoring Component Trees – Deep trees hide unnecessary renders. 3️⃣ Overlooking State & Props – Changes in parent state can trigger unexpected child re-renders. 4️⃣ Misreading Flame Charts – Not understanding which operations are expensive. 💡 How to Use React DevTools Effectively: ------------------------------------------------- ✅ Profiler Tab – Measure every render and find bottlenecks. ✅ Highlight Updates – See exactly which components re-render. ✅ Inspect Component Props & State – Check if changes are causing unnecessary renders. ✅ Compare Commits – Analyze how updates affect your tree. ✅ Filter and Focus – Only measure the components that matter. 🚀 Pro Tip: “React DevTools doesn’t just show problems… it tells you exactly where to optimize.” 💬 Your Turn: Which feature of React DevTools helped you most in improving performance? #reactjs #reactdeveloper #webdevelopment #frontend #javascript #reactperformance #profiling #devtools #softwareengineering #frontendengineering #performanceoptimization #cleancode #techlead
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore related topics
- Coding Best Practices to Reduce Developer Mistakes
- How Developers Use Composition in Programming
- Optimization Strategies for Code Reviewers
- How to Improve Code Performance
- How to Refactor Code Thoroughly
- How to Improve Your Code Review Process
- Why Prioritize Aggressive Refactoring in Software Development
- How to Organize Code to Reduce Cognitive Load
- GitHub Code Review Workflow Best Practices
- How to Refactor Code After Deployment
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
This is a vital reality check. We often forget that JavaScript execution is fast, but DOM manipulation is slow.