GitHub's decline: 8 outages, AI-generated code, and the future of storage

I've been building enterprise software for 30+ years. I've seen platforms rise and fall. And what's happening at GitHub right now should concern every engineering leader. Eight major outages in two months. Uptime below 90% at one point in 2025. The Azure migration creating more problems than it solves. Microsoft cutting 15,000 people while the institutional knowledge to run complex distributed systems walks out the door. Developers on Hacker News aren't just venting — they're planning migrations. The Zig project already left for Codeberg. When the platform with the strongest network effects in software starts losing developer trust, that's a structural shift. But the deeper question nobody's asking: in a world where AI writes, tests, reviews, and deploys code — do we even need to store it anymore? AI-generated code is disposable by nature. You wouldn't archive every ChatGPT response. Why are we treating AI-generated commits differently? I wrote a (deliberately entertaining) piece exploring all of this — including why Microsoft FrontPage from the early 2000s might be the spiritual ancestor of GitHub's future. Substack link in comments. #GitHub #CTO #SoftwareArchitecture #AI #DevOps #EngineeringLeadership #Microsoft

  • text

Fully agree that GitHub is crumbling under the weight of AI slop, but your conclusion that we don’t need to store code doesn’t follow. All software that gets adopted needs to be updated and maintained. And if you are working with multiple agents, they need to share between one another. Version control is more important than ever because you need to audit what dingbat agent messed up. Are you suggesting that every product is a single shot code drop that never gets updated? I don’t ever see that happening

Nice Anchorman reference. 😅

LOGIC: I hate everything except the things I dont

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories