Many people claim that SOLID is merely a theoretical concept that lacks practical application. I used to share that sentiment. However, my perspective changed when I began focusing on testable code. While it's not always necessary to write unit tests for every class, practicing unit testing shifts your mindset regarding class design. - Hardcoded dependencies make testing difficult, preventing you from isolating behavior or properly mocking components. This is where Dependency Inversion becomes relevant. - When a class takes on too many responsibilities, tests become complicated and hard to maintain, prompting you to break it down. This aligns with the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). - If adding a new feature requires modifying existing code, tests may break, leading you to design for extension, which reflects the Open/Closed Principle (OCP). - If changing one implementation causes tests to fail, it indicates a flaw in your abstraction, relating to the Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP). - Large interfaces lead to tests depending on unused components, necessitating their division, which is the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP). Testability is what truly makes SOLID resonate. Theory explains what SOLID is, while testing illustrates its significance. Once you grasp this connection, SOLID evolves from mere rules into instinct. #SOLIDPrinciples #CleanCode #SoftwareEngineering #UnitTesting #TestableCode #CodeQuality #SystemDesign #SoftwareDevelopment #Programming #DevCommunity #Refactoring #DeveloperMindset
SOLID Principles through Testable Code
More Relevant Posts
-
💡 SOLID Principles — The Foundation of Clean Code If your code is hard to maintain, extend, or test… chances are you're missing SOLID. Let’s break it down 👇 🔹 S — Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) A class should have only one reason to change 👉 Keep responsibilities focused and small 🔹 O — Open/Closed Principle (OCP) Software entities should be open for extension, closed for modification 👉 Add new behavior without changing existing code 🔹 L — Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) Subtypes should be replaceable for their base types without breaking behavior 👉 If it looks like a duck, it should act like a duck 🦆 🔹 I — Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) Clients shouldn’t be forced to depend on methods they don’t use 👉 Prefer multiple small interfaces over one big one 🔹 D — Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) Depend on abstractions, not concretions 👉 High-level and low-level modules should both depend on interfaces 🔥 Why SOLID matters? ✔ Easier to maintain ✔ Better scalability ✔ Cleaner architecture ✔ More testable code 📌 Bottom Line Write code for the future — not just for today. #CleanCode #SOLID #SoftwareEngineering #SystemDesign #Programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Constructors & Destructors — The Silent Managers of Your Objects When you create an object in programming, a lot happens behind the scenes. That’s where constructors and destructors step in — quietly managing the lifecycle of your objects. ➡️Constructor — The Beginning A constructor is a special method that is automatically called when an object is created. Think of it as the setup phase: •Initializes variables •Allocates memory •Sets default or custom values It ensures your object starts in a valid, usable state no manual setup needed every time. Example mindset: “When this object is created, what should it already know or have?” ➡️Destructor — The End A destructor is called automatically when an object is destroyed or goes out of scope. This is the cleanup phase: • Releases memory • Closes files or connections • Frees resources It prevents memory leaks and keeps your program efficient. Example mindset: “When this object is no longer needed, what should be cleaned up?” Why This Matters Without constructors → objects may start incomplete or inconsistent. Without destructors → resources may never be released. Together, they ensure: Clean initialization Safe memory management Better program reliability In Simple Terms Constructor = “Start strong” Destructor = “End clean” Mastering these concepts is a small step in OOP, but a huge step toward writing robust, professional code. #OOPS #Programming #SoftwareDevelopment #CodingConcepts #LearnToCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Why simple solutions are harder to build? A counterintuitive truth in software engineering: Simple solutions are harder to build than complex ones. Complex code often comes from: • jumping into implementation too fast • not fully understanding the problem • patching edge cases as they appear It grows naturally. But simplicity requires effort: • understanding the problem deeply • removing unnecessary parts • making clear trade-offs • saying no to over-engineering That’s why simple code feels: • easier to read • easier to change • easier to trust But harder to create. Because simplicity is not about writing less code. It’s about thinking more before writing it. In the long run: Complexity slows you down. Simplicity scales. — #SoftwareEngineering #CleanCode #Programming #SystemDesign #DeveloperMindset #BuildInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
One thing I’ve learned early in my software engineering journey. Finding a Bug can be way harder than building a new feature. When you work on real industry projects especially older or legacy codebases you often face code that: • Wasn’t written by you • Isn’t perfectly clean as expected • Has logic spread across multiple layers as UI-backend-database-stored procedures • Sometimes thousands of lines of code to go through You start debugging… Tracing data through different modules Jumping between files.Reading thousands of lines of code.Checking how stored procedures affect the flow.Spending hours just to understand what’s going on and after all that effort… Sometimes the fix is just one line change. It sounds simple but the thinking process behind that one line is not.Debugging is not just about fixing errors. It’s about understanding the system respecting existing architecture and developing the skill of reading code. #SoftwareEngineering #Debugging #Programming #DevLife #Debug
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀... 𝗶𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆’𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗱. I came across something interesting during a PR review. We had a clear pattern in the project: DTOs were passed directly into method arguments for validation. No need for manual validate() calls. Simple. Consistent. But in one PR, I saw something different. AI-generated code had introduced a standard validate() call instead. And it got committed. Not because it was correct. But because it looked correct. That’s the problem. Standards don’t break loudly. They drift silently. One small deviation. Then another. And over time… Consistency is gone. What’s interesting is: The issue wasn’t the code. It worked. The issue was: 👉 It didn’t follow the system’s design. That’s where code reviews matter. Not just to check if code runs — But to check if it belongs to the system. Good systems don’t just depend on good code. They depend on consistent decisions. Do you review PRs for correctness… or for consistency as well? #SoftwareEngineering #CodeReview #SystemDesign #CleanCode #Programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
# SOLID Principles — explained simply 👇 --- * What is SOLID? SOLID is a set of 5 design principles that help you write clean, maintainable, and scalable code. --- 🟢 S — Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) A class should have only one reason to change. 👉 One class = One job --- 🟢 O — Open/Closed Principle (OCP) Code should be open for extension but closed for modification. 👉 Add new features without changing existing code --- 🟢 L — Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) Subclasses should be replaceable with parent classes without breaking the system. 👉 Child should behave like parent --- 🟢 I — Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) Don’t force a class to implement unnecessary methods. 👉 Create small, specific interfaces --- 🟢 D — Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP) Depend on abstractions, not concrete classes. 👉 Use interfaces instead of direct implementations --- ⚡ Why SOLID matters? Without SOLID → tightly coupled, hard-to-change code With SOLID → flexible and scalable systems --- 💡 Reality: SOLID doesn’t make your code shorter… It makes your code maintainable in the long run. #Java #SOLIDPrinciples #CleanCode #SystemDesign #Programming #DesignPatterns #SystemDesign #Programming #BackendDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💡 Overengineering Is Also a Bug Early in my journey, I thought: 👉 “More abstraction = better code” So I used to: • Create reusable components for everything • Add layers “just in case” • Generalize before understanding the real need It felt like good engineering. --- But in reality: • Code became harder to read • Simple changes took longer • Debugging got complicated • Team members struggled to follow the flow --- What was actually happening ❌ 👉 Solving problems that didn’t exist yet --- What changed for me ✅ I started asking: ✔ Is this abstraction solving a real problem today? ✔ Will this actually be reused? ✔ Can someone else easily understand this? --- 💡 Key Insight Overengineering doesn’t show up immediately. It shows up when you try to change the code. --- Now my approach is simple: 👉 Start simple 👉 Add complexity only when it’s needed --- Simple code is not a shortcut. It’s a design decision. --- Have you ever felt you overengineered something? 😄 #SoftwareEngineering #CleanCode #Programming #Developers #SystemDesign #FullStackDeveloper
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
There is a very specific kind of joy in opening a pull request where the line count is completely negative. We spend so much time talking about shipping new features and writing complex logic. But no one really talks about the absolute satisfaction of finding a ghost town of deprecated code and just hitting delete. Early in your career, it feels like productivity is measured by how many thousands of lines you can add to a project. But the longer you maintain software, the more you realize that every single line of code is a liability. It is just one more thing that has to be tested, maintained, and eventually fixed when it inevitably breaks. Deleting old, unused features feels like deep cleaning the entire architecture. It removes dead weight, makes it easier for new engineers to understand the system, and honestly, less code just means fewer bugs. #softwareEngineering #techdebt #programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
💡 Rethinking Dependency Injection: Do We Always Need It? Dependency Injection (DI) is widely considered a best practice in modern software development. But does it need to be applied in every scenario? Consider transformation classes. 👉 If a transformation class is: - Used only once - Stateless - Not reused across components Injecting it as a service may not always be necessary. Creating an object directly at the point of use can often be a simpler and more practical approach. It helps keep the code: ✔️ Cleaner ✔️ Easier to read ✔️ Free from unnecessary abstraction DI is extremely valuable for managing shared dependencies, improving testability, and enabling loose coupling. However, overusing it can sometimes lead to avoidable complexity. ⚖️ The takeaway: Apply Dependency Injection where it truly adds value—not as a default for every class. Sometimes, simplicity is the better design choice. #SoftwareEngineering #CleanCode #Architecture #DependencyInjection #Programming #TechThoughts
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Hello #Connections 👋 😅 We thought it was just a ‘useless’ line of code… 💻 Developer: “Let’s comment this out, nothing will happen…” ⏳ 2 seconds later… 💥 469 errors appear out of nowhere. 🤯 “Yeh sab is ek line pe depend tha…?” This is the hidden complexity of software systems. 🧩 Even the smallest piece of code can be tightly coupled with multiple layers: – Dependencies – Side effects – Hidden logic flows – Legacy connections 💡 Lesson: There is no such thing as “just a small change” in production code. ✔️ Always understand dependencies ✔️ Never underestimate existing logic ✔️ Test before and after every change Because in development… one small change can break an entire system. 😅 #softwareengineering #programming #developers #codinglife #debugging #devlife #coding #tech #engineering #memes #techmemes #programmingmemes #codermemes #developermemes #relatable #funny #workmemes #developerlife #buglife
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development