Dwiti Bhavsar’s Post

Correlation tells you what moved together. Causal inference tells you what actually caused it. After this, you'll be able to estimate the true causal effect of any intervention : a promo, a product change, a policy shift - from observational data. No A/B test required. The technique: Propensity Score Matching (PSM) in Python. 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟭 :𝗜𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗹 ```bash pip install causalinference ``` 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟮 :𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 You need three columns: outcome Y, binary treatment D, and confounders X. ```python import pandas as pd df = pd.read_csv("observational_data.csv") Y = df["revenue"].values D = df["received_promo"].values  # 1 = treated, 0 = control X = df[["age", "tenure", "spend_last_90d"]].values ``` 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟯 : 𝗕𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝘂𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹 ```python from causalinference import CausalModel model = CausalModel(Y, D, X) model.est_via_matching() print(model.estimates) ``` 𝗦𝘁𝗲𝗽 𝟰 : Read your results The key output is ATE (Average Treatment Effect) - the estimated causal lift, adjusted for selection bias. 📌 Always run `model.summary_stats` first. If treated and control groups don't overlap in propensity score distribution, your estimate is invalid — check covariate balance before trusting any number. The result: instead of "promo users had 23% higher revenue," you can say "the promo caused a £42 average revenue lift, controlling for age and prior spend." That's a claim your finance team can't easily dismiss. Have you applied causal inference in a real project? What's the hardest part to justify to non-technical stakeholders? #DataAnalytics #Data #Python #DataScience #Analytics #Statistics #CausalInference #BusinessIntelligence

  • graphical user interface, application

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories