Durgesh Suryawanshi’s Post

I recently ran into a production bug that didn’t make sense at first. The code looked correct. The logic was sound. And yet… execution order was completely off. After digging deeper, the issue wasn’t the code itself — it was how the browser was scheduling it. That’s when I had to go back to fundamentals: the Event Loop. At the core of browser execution are 4 moving parts: 🔹 Call Stack – synchronous execution 🔹 Web APIs – timers, network, DOM events 🔹 Task Queue – macrotasks 🔹 Microtask Queue – Promises, MutationObserver 🎯 The root cause? A Promise callback was executing before a timer-based callback — even though the timer had 0 delay. Because: 👉 All microtasks run before the next macrotask. That small detail caused a race condition where state was being updated earlier than expected — breaking the flow. 💡 Fixing it required: • Rethinking execution order (not just code order) • Moving critical logic into the correct queue • Ensuring state updates aligned with the event loop cycle This wasn’t just a “bug fix” — it was a reminder: 🔁 If something feels off in async JavaScript, don’t just debug the code — debug the event loop. Once you see it, everything clicks. --- ♻️ Repost if you’ve ever chased a “ghost bug” in async JS 💬 Comment: What’s the trickiest async issue you’ve debugged? #JavaScript #EventLoop #AsyncProgramming #WebDevelopment #Frontend #SoftwareEngineering #Coding #Debugging #JS #WebPerformance #Developers

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories