What if your AI coding assistant could also manage multiple software applications, with milestones and tasks? I've been experimenting with something with Claude Code. Instead of just using AI to write code, I built a coordination layer on top of Claude Code CLI that handles task management, code review, and progress tracking across multiple projects. AI Company, a human gives direction, an AI Coordinator breaks work into milestones and tasks, and AI Workers execute autonomously. The whole system runs on markdown files and git. No database, no custom framework. https://lnkd.in/dFcMjynW I drop docs/SOWs into a folder (or reused existing project with git history). The Coordinator reads it, asks questions, plans milestones, and assigns workers. Code gets reviewed, revisions get tracked, and I only step in for decisions that need attention. The internal operating model is just structured markdown files in a git repo: - 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐌.𝐦𝐝 — current task, status, and worker notes per project - 𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐄𝐒.𝐦𝐝 — milestone breakdown with task progress - 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖_𝐋𝐎𝐆.𝐦𝐝 — every code review verdict and feedback - 𝐂𝐄𝐎_𝐈𝐍𝐁𝐎𝐗.𝐦𝐝 — escalations and action items that need my attention - 𝐑𝐄𝐆𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐘.𝐦𝐝 — which worker is on which project right now Github Repo: https://lnkd.in/dFcMjynW #ClaudeCode #AINative #SoftwareDevelopment
AI Coding Assistant Manages Multiple Projects with Claude Code
More Relevant Posts
-
If you're using AI coding agents and still prompting your way through features, you're leaving a massive amount of productivity on the table. I recently started using GitHub's Spec Kit an open-source toolkit for Spec-Driven Development and the shift in how I work has been dramatic. Here's the problem it solves: Most of us treat AI agents like search engines. We describe something vaguely, get code back, and spend hours debugging why it "doesn't quite work." The AI is capable our approach is the bottleneck. Spec Kit flips this entirely. You define the what and why in structured specifications first, then let the AI handle the how through a disciplined, multi-step process: → Constitution: lock in your non-negotiable project principles. → Specify: describe the feature in detail user stories, requirements, acceptance criteria. → Plan: define the architecture, tech stack, and constraints. → Tasks: break everything into small, reviewable, implementable units. → Implement: let the AI execute systematically, not randomly. Why this is faster than other spec-driven approaches: • It's agent-agnostic works with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Gemini, Windsurf, and 20+ other agents. No vendor lock-in like AWS Kiro. • It's open source (MIT license, 81k+ GitHub stars) you own the workflow and can customize templates, extensions, and presets to match your team's standards. • It works for both greenfield AND brownfield projects not just "build me a new app from scratch" demos. • The community is thriving extensions for Jira integration, post-implementation reviews, multi-agent orchestration, and more. Compared to tools like Kiro (locked to one IDE, rigid 3-file workflow) or doing SDD manually with CLAUDE.md files (lightweight but no structure), Spec Kit hits the sweet spot: enough structure to keep AI disciplined, enough flexibility to adapt to how your team actually works. The real insight? Spending 20 minutes writing a clear spec saves you hours of debugging AI-generated code that missed the intent. The spec becomes the source of truth not the code. If you're building anything beyond quick prototypes with AI, give this a serious look. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/dR-Wx7as
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I’ve been using a 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐬 workflow for my recent projects and it’s changed how I work with coding agents. Instead of jumping straight into code, the agent first thinks. It asks questions, clarifies the problem, and helps shape a clear design before writing anything. Superpowers plugin is a structured methodology that turns an AI agent into an engineering system- planning, testing, reviewing, and executing step by step. Here’s the flow: → Brainstorming: refine the idea into a clear spec → Design approval: validate before building → Planning: break work into small, actionable tasks → TDD: follow RED → GREEN → REFACTOR → Execution: tasks handled and reviewed independently → Verification: nothing moves forward unchecked A common take is: “This uses more tokens.” Upfront — yes. But over time, it actually reduces token usage. Why? Because early clarity avoids expensive cycles of debugging, rework, and fixing misunderstood requirements — which consume far more tokens and effort. So instead of: build → break → fix → repeat You get: think → plan → build → verify And that shift makes all the difference in code quality and speed. Curious how others are approaching structured AI workflows. github repo : https://lnkd.in/gUmm8Khz
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Spec-Driven AI development began a trend that has quickly taken things much further. This project creates an environment, built on well known practices, where you interactively create the spec of the project, and the design plan, and then unleash a team of agents to build it. These frameworks are evolving rapidly, and appearing everywhere! —- GitHub - obra/superpowers: An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works. · GitHub https://ow.ly/CqO950YJ9CK
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
AI is disrupting everything, and looks like there's a need to build a version control system that scales for a world of coding assistants, in particular for large monorepos. A post on GitHub's availability describes how AI-assisted coding is the reason why GitHub has been struggling with keeping their availability above three 9s, let alone five 9s. • Five 9s (99.999%) means ~ 5 minutes and 20 seconds in downtime every year, or roughly 26 seconds per month. • Three 9s (99.9%) uptime means ~ 8 hours and 46 minutes of downtime per year, or ~ 44 minutes per month. If you just eye-ball the charts, you can see the exponential impact of coding assistants. The numbers are quite staggering. From the charts, it looks like the first quarter of 2026 has seen as much growth for merged PRs as the previous three years together. Same for commits and number of repos. A data point that the post doesn't visualize is the rise of monorepos, and that rise appears to be "𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘦" than just a higher amount of activity. The rise of monorepos makes a lot of sense. AI-assisted development needs context. Monorepos offers exactly that, the entire codebase in one place. The coding assistant has access to every line of code a change will affect, supported by a single AI configuration file. Last year, with Opus 4.6, Anthropic introduced a 1M token context window, and removed the previous limit of 200K tokens. 1M is enough for large codebases (like with monorepos), and judging based on GitHub's post, developers certainly seem to make use of that context window by shifting from poly- to monorepos. Or at least build new monorepos. Some of scaling challenges of monorepos for git are slow git clone and git fetch operations, and for larger organizations like enterprises just the sheer amount of daily PRs to a single repo. 44 minutes per month is quite a bit of downtime, and then add that the secondary effects, e.g. from restarting your CI/CD pipelines. Facebook / Meta developed Sapling exactly for the use case of large codebases. Only very few companies operate at Meta's scale, and they probably already have their own version control system (e.g. Google). But Sapling is open source. So who knows, with the rise of AI coding and monorepos, maybe Sapling's time has come. The crazy thing is that with LLMs, the bar to build your own source control system just got lower. Original post by GitHub CTO Vladimir Fedorov here: https://lnkd.in/gfqu4dmr Less than a year ago, people would have told anyone they're crazy to adopt a monorepo. Yet here we are.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
6 CLAUDE CODE PLUGINS WORTH ADDING TO ANY AI ENGINEERING STACK Some Claude Code plugins stand out because they solve very specific developer pain points and make AI-assisted workflows significantly more effective: 1. 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗣𝗢𝗪𝗘𝗥𝗦 A powerful productivity layer for Claude Code that enhances workflows with useful automations and developer shortcuts. https://lnkd.in/ertHvS2R 2. 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗗 𝗗𝗘𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡 Ideal for accelerating UI and frontend prototyping, helping bridge the gap between design ideas and implementation. https://lnkd.in/eAKvdKvr 3. 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗨𝗗𝗘-𝗠𝗘𝗠 Adds persistent contextual memory, making longer and more complex development sessions far more coherent. https://lnkd.in/ekCCGrRw 4. 𝗖𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪 Useful for identifying inconsistencies, improving code quality, and surfacing refactoring opportunities before deployment. https://lnkd.in/eqUMUX22 5. 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗥𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪 Helps detect vulnerabilities early, especially in sensitive logic, exposed endpoints, and risky configurations. https://lnkd.in/ey6iie2q 6. 𝗚𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗞 Designed for orchestrating more advanced multi-agent and multi-tool workflows across complex AI systems. github.com/garrytan/gstack Together, these plugins cover six critical dimensions of modern AI development: productivity, design, memory, code quality, security, and orchestration. Which Claude Code plugins would you add to this list?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Revolutionizing AI Development: Bringing TDD to the World of LLMs with Superpowers 🤖 We all know the mantra: Test-Driven Development (TDD) makes software more reliable, maintainable, and robust. But when it comes to LLM-based applications, the "non-deterministic" nature of AI has made traditional TDD feel nearly impossible. Enter Superpowers—the framework designed to bring engineering discipline to the chaotic world of AI development. 🦸 What is Superpowers? Superpowers is an open-source framework (check it out on GitHub: https://lnkd.in/gi9R9N5k) that allows developers to build AI "programs" with the same rigor we apply to traditional software. It treats LLM prompts and outputs as components that can be tested, versioned, and refined. 🛠️ How it brings TDD to the AI Lifecycle In traditional AI dev, we "prompt and pray." With Superpowers, we shift to a Test-First mentality: 1. Define the Expectation: Write a test case for what the AI should return. 2. Develop the Prompt: Create the persona and instructions. 3. Automated Validation: Run the suite to see if the AI meets the criteria. If it fails, you iterate on the prompt until the test passes. 📈 Improving Development: From Design to Delivery Superpowers bridges the gap between a "cool demo" and "production-ready software": • Design: Clearly define the boundaries of what your AI agent should and shouldn't do through executable specifications. • Development: Shorten the feedback loop. Instead of manually checking every chat response, let the framework validate your changes instantly. • Delivery: Deploy with confidence. You’ll know exactly how a change in the underlying model (like moving from GPT-4 to a local Llama model) affects your output quality. ❓ Why should you care? The "Wild West" era of AI development is ending. To build enterprise-grade AI, we need tools that support reproducibility and reliability. Superpowers provides the scaffolding to ensure your AI behaves like a professional tool, not a random guesser. If you’re tired of "prompt engineering" by trial and error, it’s time to look at Superpowers. Check out the repo and start building smarter: 🔗 https://lnkd.in/gi9R9N5k #AI #SoftwareEngineering #TDD #LLMs #OpenSource #DevOps #GenerativeAI #Superpowers
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
For modern developers, AI coding assistants have evolved from experimental novelties into absolute necessities. They are vital extensions of our cognitive process, helping us move faster and focus on the fun parts of solving complex problems. Recently, GitHub announced a significant overhaul to its Copilot plans for individual users coming in April 2026. The previous single subscription is splitting into a baseline essential tier and an advanced professional tier. What does this mean for your daily workflow? Our newest guide at FlowDevs cuts through the noise. We explain the exact feature differences, how the pricing changes affect freelancers and indie developers, and what actions you need to take right now. We even included a simple decision tree so you can quickly figure out which AI tier makes sense for your specific needs. Understanding your tools is just as important as writing the code itself. Read the full breakdown on our blog. If you are looking to integrate custom AI tools, Power Apps, and intelligent automation into your broader business systems, we are ready to bring your technical vision to life. Schedule a strategy session with us at https://lnkd.in/eAVD5GaA. #GitHubCopilot #SoftwareDevelopment #ArtificialIntelligence #WorkflowAutomation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
When Git Goes 3D: Why Human Ingenuity is the Ultimate Tech Stack in the AI Era We are standing at the precipice of a radical shift in software engineering. In the advent of AI, the traditional barriers to entry are dissolving. The playing field is leveling, and the tools at our disposal are becoming universal. Whether you are a solo developer in a garage or an engineer at a Fortune 500 company, we all increasingly have access to the same omnipotent, AI-driven copilots. Tools are no longer the differentiator; they are the baseline. As AI accelerates our workflows, the very anatomy of how we build software is morphing into something unrecognizable: 📂 The Death of the Precious Project Gone are the days of carefully architected, monolithic project structures. Today, project folders are created on a whim. They are disposable sandboxes. Directories have become nothing more than slugified strings—`my-app-test-v4-beta`—spun up by an LLM, iterated upon, and discarded just as quickly. 🔀 The Evolution of Version Control As machines begin to write, test, and deploy code alongside us, human-readable version control is fading. Forget neatly named feature branches like `fix/auth-bug-ticket-123`. Git branches are rapidly becoming auto-generated UUIDs. 🌌 Into the Third Dimension Consequently, our mental models must shift. The traditional 2D Git graph—that reliable, linear map of commits, forks, and merges—is no longer sufficient. When you have dozens of AI agents concurrently exploring different algorithmic paths, refactoring code, and resolving dependencies in parallel, the 2D graph expands into a 3D constellation. Version control becomes a multi-dimensional web of permutations and possibilities. If the machine handles the syntax, the structure, and the scale… what is left for us? It sounds like a loss of control, but it is actually a liberation. When the mechanics of coding are fully commoditized, we are freed from being mere syntax translators. What remains—and what becomes infinitely more valuable—is the human ingenuity behind the screen. When tools are equal, the advantage goes to the visionary. Our value shifts entirely from how to build something to what to build, and most importantly, why we are building it. It is our empathy for the end-user. It is our understanding of market nuances. It is our relentless pursuit of solving novel, complex problems that no machine has historical data on. In tech, the paradigm shifts whether we invite it to or not. We don’t get to choose the technological evolution; we just have to play the cards we are dealt. But as the abstractions grow deeper, the branches become UUIDs, and our Git graphs go 3D, remember this: software is still ultimately built by humans, for humans. The AI is the brush, but you are still the artist. What novel problems are you excited to solve with your new set of brushes? Let’s discuss in the comments. 👇 #ArtificialIntelligence #SoftwareEngineering #FutureOfWork #HumanIngenuity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most AI coding tools help you write code faster. But shipping software is not just writing code. It is turning an idea into a production-ready solution that is tested, stable, scalable, and verifiable. Whether you are an entrepreneur shaping a new product idea, a developer building on an existing codebase, or a DevOps engineer wiring up infrastructure, the journey from concept to production touches far more than code. Discovery, architecture, specs, planning, execution, review, deployment. Most tools accelerate one of those steps. None of them connect the full chain. So I built Arness. Yes, I dropped the H on purpose 😊. Today I'm open-sourcing it. Arness is a plugin marketplace for Claude Code by Anthropic that covers the entire software project lifecycle. Three plugins, each independently installable, but together they form a single pipeline from first idea to production: Spark takes a raw idea through product discovery, persona generation, competitive research, brand naming (with real WHOIS and trademark checks), architecture evaluation, full use case specs, and clickable prototypes you can present to a customer or stakeholder. Every artifact feeds directly into the coding phase. Code is a development pipeline that scales process to scope. A quick bug fix gets minimal ceremony. A cross-cutting feature gets full spec, plan, multi-agent execution, and review with parallel execution across Git worktrees. It works on new and existing codebases, learning your patterns automatically. Infra handles containerisation, IaC, CI/CD, environment promotion, secrets, and monitoring with the same structured change management as the dev pipeline. It knows you. Arness captures your experience, skills, and preferences on first use and carries them across every session. Your idea, your codebase patterns, your target audience, your skill set. It all persists without you having to repeat yourself. 88 skills and 46 specialist agents behind the scenes, but you only need three entry points: /arn-brainstorming, /arn-planning, and /arn-infra-wizard. From there, each plugin drives itself. Integrates with GitHub, Jira, Bitbucket, and optionally Figma and Canva. Tested with about two dozen colleagues over the past several months. Their feedback shaped every rough edge. Their enthusiasm gave me the confidence to share it more widely. To all the fellow engineers, entrepreneurs, and builders I have met during my career: this is for you. MIT license, fully open source. Arness was built with Arness. All 134 components went through its own pipeline. https://lnkd.in/eVd6whVS If you try it, I would genuinely love your feedback. And if it resonates, a star on GitHub goes a long way for an open-source project just getting started. #OpenSource #AI #AgenticAI #DevTools #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Artificial intelligence is changing software development faster than we can track. GitHub just announced a massive update to Copilot for individual developers, and if you write code, you need to know what is coming. Starting April 2026, GitHub is completely restructuring its individual Copilot plans. They are introducing new pricing tiers, better AI model selection, and larger context windows. This means the AI can understand more of your project files at once to give you better suggestions. If you use Copilot for personal projects or freelance work, your subscription will change soon. The good news is that corporate and enterprise plans stay exactly the same. We just published a comprehensive guide breaking down how these updates impact your daily workflow. It includes a simple decision tree and a timeline to help you navigate the new structure without any stress. At FlowDevs, we love helping teams integrate the latest AI capabilities into their daily operations. Read our full breakdown on the blog today. If you need expert guidance evaluating AI tools or building intelligent automation for your business, let us talk. You can schedule a strategy session directly at https://lnkd.in/eAVD5GaA. #GitHubCopilot #SoftwareEngineering #ArtificialIntelligence
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
- Smart Project Milestone Tracking
- How AI can Improve Coding Tasks
- How AI Assists in Debugging Code
- How to Use AI for Manual Coding Tasks
- How to Use AI to Make Software Development Accessible
- AI-Based Progress Monitoring Tools
- How to Manage AI Coding Tools as Team Members
- AI for Cross-Functional Task Coordination
- How to Boost Productivity With AI Coding Assistants
- AI-Driven Task Success Metrics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development