Digital work is still being interpreted as if artifacts are the whole record.
Documents, messages, and finalized outputs are treated as the primary evidence of what happened. Everything else, such as autosaves, sync artifacts, metadata residues, temporary files, etc., is often ignored or treated as noise.
This creates a structural blind spot.
Digital work does not form from artifacts alone. It forms through continuous interaction between human activity and system response.
Those system responses leave traces.
In Information Archaeology, those traces are treated as a formal evidence class: ecofacts.
Ecofacts don’t describe what someone intended; instead, they describe how the environment behaved:
• where activity intensified or paused
• how systems handled concurrent changes
• what constraints shaped the work
• where drift began to appear
• where loss or overwrite occurred
Without this layer, reconstruction becomes simplified. Sequences appear cleaner than they were, environments disappear, and gaps are easy to overlook.
Including ecofacts changes the model. Digital work can be read as something that formed over time through interaction, rather than a set of isolated outputs.
Information Archaeology formalizes this through Ecofact-Based Reconstruction (EBR), establishing methods for treating environmental traces as structured evidence.
InformationArchaeology.org
#InformationArchaeology #DigitalWork #DigitalEvidence #Ecofacts #Provenance #Metadata #DigitalForensics #TrustworthyAI
I love Arthur Dolers talks 💞