Spring Boot Architecture Tutorial: Build from Scratch

Day 1 - 🚫Stop watching Spring Boot tutorials. Build this instead. Most tutorials skip the architecture. This one starts with it. 🚀TechFromZero Series - SpringbootFromZero This isn't a Hello World. It's a real layered architecture: 📐 Request → Controller → Service → Repository → MySQL 🔗 The full code (with step-by-step commits you can follow): https://lnkd.in/dEB8Ug2g If anyone has a idea, improvement or recommendation please try to fork the repo and submit a pull request, Everyone is welcome to do so. 🧱 What I built (step by step): 1️⃣ Spring Boot skeleton with health check 2️⃣ JPA Entity — Product domain model 3️⃣ Repository — Spring Data JPA 4️⃣ DTO — ProductDTO with mapping 5️⃣ Service interface + implementation 6️⃣ REST Controller with full CRUD 7️⃣ Exception handling + seed data 8️⃣ Complete tutorial guide 💡 Every file has detailed comments explaining WHY, not just what. Written for any beginner who wants to learn Spring Boot by reading real code — with full clarity on each step. 👉 If you're a beginner learning Spring Boot, clone it and read the commits one by one. Each commit = one concept. Each file = one lesson. Built from scratch, so nothing is hidden. 🔥 This is Day 1 of a 50-day series. A new technology every day. Follow along! #TechFromZero #Day1 #SpringBoot #Java #REST #API #LearnByDoing #OpenSource #BeginnerGuide #100DaysOfCode #CodingFromScratch

  • No alternative text description for this image

Nice tutorial, great job. Couple recommendations: 1) In my opinion, introducing a separate service interface at this stage is redundant. There is only one implementation, so the extra abstraction does not add real value yet. 2) Returning a Map inside GlobalExceptionHandler is not ideal. It would be better to use a dedicated ErrorDetails DTO, so the structure is consistent and we don't have to remember keys every time.3) If the goal is to follow a more standard project structure with separated responsibilities, the converter/mapper could also be moved into its own package instead of keeping it inside service.4) Instead of setting createdAt manually, it would be cleaner to use entity-level annotations (e.g., @CreationTimestamp or @CreatedDate) to handle this automatically.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories