Optimistic Locking vs Pessimistic Locking: Trade-Offs and Performance

🔁 Follow-up to my previous post on preventing double booking using pessimistic locking. I’ve now implemented an optimistic locking version of the same Booking Service in a separate branch and tested it under concurrency. Key differences I observed: • ⚡ Higher throughput under low–moderate contention • 🔁 Failed updates detected via version checks (instead of blocking) • 🧠 Business logic must be retry-safe • ❗ Retries can amplify load under high contention This made the trade-offs very clear: • Pessimistic locking → safer under extreme contention, but blocks • Optimistic locking → faster, but needs careful retry + idempotency Both implementations are tested using Testcontainers + MySQL with concurrent booking attempts. 🔗 Optimistic locking branch: https://lnkd.in/gGtjjJSR #SystemDesign #BackendEngineering #Java #SpringBoot #DistributedSystems

  • text

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories