Darya Petrashka’s Post

Once in my data science career, I had to debug a 400+ line Python function. No, it’s not a joke. And no, I wasn’t its author. It was a single, sprawling function that processed multiple DataFrames, and no one could clearly explain what it actually did. But the system relied on it, and something inside was broken. I had to fix it fast. Here’s how I approached it: 1. Collected a reliable input dataset to reproduce the issue 2. Understood what the expected output should look like 3. Ensured my local setup ran consistently 4. Identified key transformation stages (where data changed meaningfully) 5. Inspected outputs stage by stage 6. Found the broken logic, fixed it, and ensured unit tests passed When in doubt, I used a binary search approach: splitting the function in half and testing each side until I narrowed down the issue. It’s surprisingly effective for debugging massive code blocks. How do you approach debugging large, unfamiliar codebases? #DataScience #Python #Debugging #SoftwareEngineering #ProblemSolving #CareerGrowth

  • No alternative text description for this image

An actual debugger here (where you can stop the execution line for line) would be massively useful. You advance step by step and see how the input is being processed. At some point you'll see the data transforming into something quirky, and you find the faulty logic. It's awesome that you split the function into smaller parts, though, nothing needs to be 400 lines long.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories