Himanshu Sharma’s Post

Most React performance problems aren’t “React problems” — they’re architecture mistakes: putting the wrong code on the wrong side. ⚖️⚡ React Server Components (RSC) vs Client Components is less about hype and more about boundaries. I use this decision pattern: ✅ Default to Server Components when: • fetching data + rendering UI can happen on the server • the component is mostly static or data-driven • you want smaller bundles + faster first paint Examples: dashboards, lists, detail pages, email/HR records, healthcare summaries 🏥 ✅ Use Client Components when you need: • interactivity (state, effects, subscriptions) • browser APIs (localStorage, media, geolocation) • realtime UX (drag/drop, charts with live updates) Examples: scheduling UI, triage workflows, energy monitoring controls ⚙️ Practical rule: keep the “shell” on the server, push only the “interaction island” to the client. 🌊 Watchouts I see in Next.js: • importing a client component too high forces big client bundles • mixing data fetching + heavy UI libraries in client components kills TTFB/JS cost • streaming is great, but only if your component graph stays server-first 🚀 If you’re designing a new feature: what is the smallest client surface area you can get away with? #react #nextjs #javascript #webperformance #frontend

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories