Clayton Mmbehi’s Post

When I look at a Java codebase for the first time, I don't start with the business logic. Here's exactly what I check in the first 30 minutes — and what it tells me about the team that built it. ─── MINUTE 0–5: The build file ─── How many dependencies are there? Are versions pinned or floating? Is there anything in there that shouldn't exist? A bloated pom.xml tells me the team added without ever removing. Technical debt starts here. ─── MINUTE 5–10: The package structure ─── Is it organised by layer (controller/service/repo)? Or by feature (orders/users/payments)? Neither is wrong. But inconsistency tells me nobody agreed — and that means nobody was leading. ─── MINUTE 10–15: Exception handling ─── Are exceptions caught and swallowed silently? Are there empty catch blocks? Is there a global exception handler? Empty catch blocks are where bugs go to hide forever. ─── MINUTE 15–20: The tests ─── What's the coverage? (Not the number — the quality) Are they testing behaviour or implementation? Do they have meaningful names? A test named test1() tells me everything I need to know. ─── MINUTE 20–25: Logging ─── Is there enough to debug a production issue? Is there too much (log noise)? Are sensitive fields being logged? (Passwords, tokens, PII) ─── MINUTE 25–30: @Transactional usage ─── Is it applied correctly? Is it on private methods? (Silently ignored) Is it on everything? (Misunderstood) By the time I'm done, I know the team's level, their communication habits, and where the bodies are buried. What's the first thing YOU look at in a new codebase? 👇 #Java #CodeReview #SpringBoot #BackendDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #JavaDeveloper #CleanCode #Programming

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories