Following up on my earlier post about Python graph optimization. One thing that became very clear after sharing the work publicly is how important evidence-backed engineering is—especially when discussing performance. After publishing the case study, I went back and revalidated every claim against actual execution logs, not assumptions or theoretical estimates. The README was regenerated directly from benchmark output to ensure alignment between documentation and reality. What the data consistently shows: Single-source shortest paths: ~3.5× speedup Bidirectional shortest path queries: ~70× speedup Connected components: ~1× (near parity, as expected for full graph scans) Compilation cost: ~50–70 ms, paid once Correctness: validated against NetworkX for every run This reinforced an important lesson: Optimization is not about rewriting code—it’s about understanding data layout, access patterns, and workload shape. NetworkX is excellent for flexibility and research. But in read-heavy, static-graph production systems, preprocessing and amortization can fundamentally change performance characteristics—even in pure Python. I’m continuing to focus on: Python performance engineering Algorithmic efficiency Benchmarking rigor Production-oriented tradeoffs If you’re working on latency-sensitive systems, backend services, or algorithm-heavy workloads, I’d be glad to exchange notes. Code + benchmarks remain available here: https://lnkd.in/ezkRivF4 #Python #PerformanceEngineering #SystemsEngineering #Backend #Optimization #Algorithms
Python Performance Engineering: Evidence-Backed Optimization
More Relevant Posts
-
Data Processing in 9 Lines of Python 🐍 Everyone talks about data science, but here's what we actually do all day: python # 1. CLEANUP - Remove duplicates & missing values df_clean = df.drop_duplicates().fillna(df.mean()) # 2. STANDARDIZATION - Make it consistent df['name'] = df['name'].str.upper() # 3. VALIDATION - Keep only valid data df_valid = df[df['age'] > 0] # 4. MANIPULATION - Filter & sort df_filtered = df[df['salary'] > 50000].sort_values('age') # 5. TRANSFORMATION - Create new features df['salary_category'] = df['salary'].apply(lambda x: 'High' if x > 55000 else 'Low') # 6. ENRICHMENT - Add more info df['bonus'] = df['salary'] * 0.10 # 7. AGGREGATION - Summarised summary = df.groupby('name')['salary'].sum() # 8. MODELING - Structure relationships customer_table = df[['name', 'age']].drop_duplicates() # 9. QUALITY CHECK - Measure completeness quality_score = df.notna().sum() / len(df) The reality: Before any analysis happens, we cycle through these steps multiple times. Data comes messy. We clean it. Find more issues. Clean again. Transform. Validate. Transform differently. It's a loop, not a straight line. 80% of data work = preparing data 20% of data work = actual analysis Save this for your next data project! 📌 #DataScience #Python #Pandas #DataEngineering #Analytics
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝐏𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬: 𝐆𝐋𝐌𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Python is powerful due to its extensive ecosystem of statistical and data science libraries. Excel, on the other hand, is widely used, transparent, and trusted by actuaries. Historically, using Python often meant stepping away from Excel and dealing with local installations, complex environments, and obtaining IT approvals. In this article, I provide a hands-on example of building a Poisson Generalized Linear Model (GLM) for claim frequency directly within Excel. This process involves working with Excel data, exposure offsets, diagnostics, validation, and visualizations, all within a single workbook. Python in Excel operates in an Azure-hosted environment, eliminating the need for local installations. This feature makes it especially practical for actuaries in restricted IT settings. The aim is not to 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥. Instead, it is to demonstrate that if you already understand GLMs and Excel, you can begin using Python with minimal coding and minimal disruption to your workflow. This example covers: - Claim frequency modelling with exposure offsets - Model interpretation and diagnostics - Validation and communication using familiar Excel-style outputs - How Python in Excel lowers the barrier to adopting Python libraries If you are curious about Python but prefer to remain within a familiar environment, this could be a helpful starting point.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Just came across this insightful piece from KDnuggets on integrating Rust and Python for data science—it's a timely look at boosting your workflows beyond Python's usual limits. Instead of sticking solely to Python's convenience, it shows how Rust can inject serious performance gains, especially in areas demanding tight memory management and predictability. This resource is free and available here: https://lnkd.in/ef4ErP7V Here's the summarised version, with 6 key insights you can apply now: #1 Why Rust? → It offers low-level control to optimize bottlenecks in data pipelines where Python falls short. #2 Integration Tools → Use libraries like PyO3 or rust-cpython to seamlessly bind Rust code into Python scripts. #3 Performance Boosts → Rust excels in compute-heavy tasks, reducing execution time in ML model training or data processing. #4 Memory Management → Gain fine-grained control to avoid Python's garbage collection overhead in large datasets. #5 Use Cases → Ideal for high-throughput ETL jobs, real-time analytics, or embedded systems in enterprise AI. #6 Getting Started → Start with simple extensions, test interoperability, and scale to production for reliable gains. Bottom line → Pairing Rust with Python isn't hype—it's a pragmatic way to make data science tools enterprise-ready without overhauling your stack. ♻️ If this was useful, repost it so others can benefit too. Follow me here or on X → @ernesttheaiguy for daily insights on data engineering and AI implementation.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most Python tutorials stop at lists and loops. Real-world data work starts with files and control flow. As part of rebuilding my Python foundations for Data, ML, and AI, I’m now revising two topics that show up everywhere in production systems: 📁 File Handling 🔀 Control Structures Here are short, practical notes that make these concepts easy to grasp 👇 (Save this if you work with data) 🧠 Python Essentials — Short Notes 🔹 1. File Handling (Reading & Writing Files) File handling allows Python to interact with external data. Common modes: • 'r' → read • 'w' → write (overwrite) • 'a' → append with open("data.txt", "r") as f: data = f.read() Why with? ✔ Automatically closes the file ✔ Safer & cleaner code Used heavily in ETL, logging, configs, batch jobs 🔹 2. Reading Files Line by Line Efficient for large files. with open("data.txt") as f: for line in f: print(line) Prevents memory overload in data pipelines. 🔹 3. Control Structures – if / elif / else Control structures let your program make decisions. if score > 90: grade = "A" elif score > 75: grade = "B" else: grade = "C" Core to validation, branching logic, error handling 🔹 4. break, continue, pass • break → exit loop • continue → skip current iteration • pass → placeholder (do nothing) for x in range(5): if x == 3: continue print(x) 🔹 5. try / except (Bonus – Production Essential) Handle runtime errors gracefully. try: result = 10 / 0 except ZeroDivisionError: print("Error handled") Critical for robust, fault-tolerant systems. Python isn’t just about syntax. It’s about controlling flow and handling data safely. #Python #DataEngineering #LearningInPublic #Analytics #ETL #Programming #AIJourney
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🧠 Python Concept That Looks Simple but Is Powerful: itertools.groupby Most people misuse it… or don’t know it exists. 🤔 What Does groupby Do? It groups consecutive items based on a key. ⚠️ Important: data must be sorted first. 🧪 Example from itertools import groupby data = ["apple", "ant", "banana", "bat", "cat"] data.sort(key=lambda x: x[0]) for key, group in groupby(data, key=lambda x: x[0]): print(key, list(group)) ✅ Output a ['ant', 'apple'] b ['banana', 'bat'] c ['cat'] 🧒 Simple Explanation 💫 Imagine kids lining up 🚶♂️🚶♀️ 💫 All kids with the same first letter stand together. groupby just points and says: 👉 “These belong together.” 💡 Why This Is Useful ✔ Data processing ✔ Logs & streams ✔ Cleaner grouping logic ✔ Used in analytics & backend code ⚠️ Common Mistake groupby(data) # ❌ without sorting 👉 This gives wrong groups. 💻 Some Python tools are quiet but powerful. 💻 itertools.groupby is one of those features that rewards developers who read the docs 🐍✨ #Python #PythonTips #PythonTricks #AdvancedPython #CleanCode #LearnPython #Programming #DeveloperLife #DailyCoding #100DaysOfCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
📊 Data Analysis with Python: From Raw Data to Insight 🐍 Python has become the go-to language for data analysis, thanks to its simplicity, flexibility, and powerful ecosystem. It enables teams to move efficiently from raw data to actionable insight—without unnecessary complexity 🚀. At the core of Python-based analysis are libraries such as pandas for data manipulation 🧹, NumPy for numerical computation 🔢, and Matplotlib / Seaborn for visualization 📈. Together, they support data cleaning, exploration, hypothesis testing, and clear communication of results. For more advanced needs, tools like SciPy, scikit-learn, and statsmodels extend Python into statistical modeling and machine learning 🤖. Beyond technical capability, Python’s real strength lies in reproducibility and transparency 🔍. Analysis workflows can be documented, version-controlled, and audited—making insights easier to validate, share, and defend. This is especially critical in regulated or high-stakes environments where decisions must be explainable ⚖️. In practice, Python bridges the gap between data, insight, and action. It supports rapid experimentation while remaining robust enough for production-grade analytics, making it an indispensable tool for modern, data-driven organizations. Follow and Connect: Prajjval Mishra #DataAnalysis #Python #DataScience #Analytics #Pandas #NumPy #MachineLearning #AI #DataDriven #DigitalTransformation #BusinessIntelligence
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I was writing a simple Python Employee class today, nothing fancy. A class variable. An __init__ method. A counter tracking how many objects were created. And it reminded me of something many of us learn the hard way as data engineers 👇 Where logic lives matters. In Python, putting one line in the wrong place means: Code runs once instead of every time State becomes misleading Results look “right” until they’re very wrong That’s not just a Python lesson. That’s a data engineering lesson. We see the same pattern everywhere: Metrics defined in the wrong layer Counters incremented in the wrong job Business logic living in pipelines instead of models “Small” design choices that quietly distort reality The scary part? Nothing crashes. Dashboards still load. Numbers still look reasonable. Until someone asks: “Why don’t these figures add up?” Good data engineering isn’t about writing clever code. It’s about putting logic in the right place, so the system behaves correctly over time, not just on day one. Sometimes the most valuable lessons come from the simplest code.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🐍 Python for Data Analysis: 5 Mistakes Even Experienced Analysts Make You've written Python code. You've used pandas. But are you doing it efficiently? **The Mistakes:** ❌ Using loops instead of vectorized operations = 100x slower ❌ Not using `.copy()` = unintended data mutations ❌ Chaining too many operations = memory issues ❌ Not using categorical data types = 80% more RAM used ❌ Ignoring dtypes = slow computations **The Right Way:** # ❌ Wrong - Loop approach (2 seconds for 100K rows) for i in range(len(df)): df.loc[i, 'sales_x_qty'] = df.loc[i, 'sales'] * df.loc[i, 'qty'] # ✅ Right - Vectorized approach (0.02 seconds) df['sales_x_qty'] = df['sales'] * df['qty'] **Optimization Wins:** 1️⃣ Memory optimization: Reduce from 2GB to 400MB with proper dtypes 2️⃣ Speed gains: Vectorized operations 50-100x faster 3️⃣ Cleaner code: Read your analysis logic, not CPU instructions **Real Example:** 📈 Processing 5M customer records: - Old approach: 180 seconds + manual type fixing - New approach: 1.8 seconds + automatic efficiency **The Principle:** Stop writing code for humans. Start thinking like pandas - in operations on entire columns, not individual rows. Your future self (and your CPU) will thank you. #Python #DataAnalysis #Pandas #DataScience #CodingTips #Analytics #Performance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Python in Data Science #006 A funny thing happens in real projects: the “modeling work” starts failing, and the root cause is almost always upstream. Not because the algorithm is wrong, but because the data cleaning was ad-hoc, inconsistent, and almost impossible to reproduce. Always treat data cleaning as a repeatable, versioned transformation, and never clean directly on raw data. A cheatsheet is useful, but the real upgrade is turning those steps (missing values, duplicates, types, outliers, invalid rows) into a predictable workflow you can rerun tomorrow and get the same dataset. It also reduces silent leakage: if you “peek” at the full dataset to decide thresholds or imputation, you can accidentally bake test-set information into training. The trade-off is a bit more upfront discipline, but you gain trust: in your results, in your features, and in your handoffs to stakeholders. df_raw = pd.read_csv("data.csv") df = df_raw.copy() df = df.drop_duplicates() df["date"] = pd.to_datetime(df["date"], errors="coerce") df["sales"] = df["sales"].fillna(0) df["name"] = df["name"].str.strip().str.lower() df = df[df["sales"] >= 0] What it improves: reproducibility, debugging speed, and confidence that changes are intentional (not accidental) Common mistake/trap: “quick fixes” in-place on raw data, then forgetting what was changed (or applying different rules each run) When I’d tune it (or when I wouldn’t): I tune cleaning rules only on the training split (thresholds, outlier caps, imputations); I don’t touch rules based on the full dataset. #python #datascience #datacleaning
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
chart that visually shows log results: SSSP (Dijkstra): ~3.6× faster with CompiledGraph. Bidirectional Search: ~73× faster. Connected Components: roughly the same performance (~1×).