PHP Generators vs Parquet: Memory Efficiency vs Processing Speed

Stop treating large API responses like small arrays. I recently benchmarked a memory-efficient ETL pipeline I built using PHP 8.4 Generators and Flow PHP. The objective was to quantify the performance gap between "traditional" data loading and "streaming" data extraction. The data doesn't lie. When processing paginated market data from CoinGecko, the architectural choice of using yield over return array changed the entire resource profile of the application. While PHP Generators enable highly memory-efficient streaming by processing one row at a time, they introduce CPU overhead due to repeated parsing and lack of batching. In contrast, Parquet readers trade higher peak memory usage for significantly improved throughput by leveraging columnar storage and chunk-based decoding. This demonstrates that memory efficiency and processing speed are often competing concerns, and the optimal approach depends on workload characteristics. Starting Performance Benchmark... --------------------------------- JSON (Streaming): - Rows: 12,500 - Time: 1.6978s - Memory Used: 4.00 MB - Peak Memory: 6.00 MB - Throughput: ~7,362 rows/sec Parquet: - Rows: 12,500 - Time: 0.5807s - Memory Used: 6.00 MB - Peak Memory: 20.25 MB - Throughput: ~21,525 rows/sec 💥 --------------------------------- RESULT: Parquet is 2.92x Faster Check out the full implementation and run the benchmarks yourself: https://lnkd.in/egdxzjeU #PHP #SoftwareArchitecture #DataEngineering #Performance #Backend #FlowPHP #CloudInfrastructure #CleanCode

  • No alternative text description for this image

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories