After years in production, I realized one thing: The “Java Spring vs Go” debate is not about what’s faster. It’s about where you pay the price. Spring Boot You pay with: — memory — startup time But you get: — development speed — stability — ready-to-use solutions Go You pay with: — development time — building infrastructure yourself But you get: — simplicity — control — performance Here’s the trap: At the start, Go feels simple Mid-project — you start reinventing things At the end — you build a “mini-Spring in Go” 😄 With Spring it’s the opposite: At first it feels complex Then you realize it already solved half your problems Main takeaway: There is no “best” stack Only the right one for the job But honestly: If I need to ship a complex backend fast — I choose Spring If I need max efficiency — I consider Go Where did you struggle more? #java #golang #springboot #backend #softwareengineering #microservices #cloudnative #programming #devlife #systemdesign
no, you don’t have to reinvent spring boot, the app architectures are different, also golang’s standard package offer’s so much that there is no need to ever use third party packages ever. you have control over everything you write, no nested levels of abstraction. also goroutines give really god performance, plus channels and ctx makes concurrent code to be easily managed.
I recommend you learn more about Java 21/25 , Spring Native, Quarkus and Graal VM
Have you considered Java without Spring?
Hi... Software engineer here... For small and BIG companies... Specialized in Go... Piece of advice: If you find yourself creating a "springboot in Go" for your company... Backtrack... You are approaching the problem wrong.
Go is a joke compared to enterprise Java ecosystem. Memory and startup time is mostly irrelevant on modern "fat" hardware. Go is fine for things that do not require substantial business logic. Otherwise it is a pain for enterprise projects.
I have no issues with both languages. But after working with Java 20+ years I find Go a better language overall. No matter all the decorations that you put on top of Java is still OOP with all the problems that comes with it. Using Annotations, reflection and all the nice things that “makes java great” you pay it later. If you use libraries like gin (spring boot like for go) you end up having a microservice up and running really quick. If you really care about performance and costs java/spring boot is not the way. I have seen so many performance improvements and they are not near to other languages.
With Quarkus and Micronaut + GraalVM, is Go still winning on performance in practice, or just in perception?
Java is doing things to improve memory consumption and startup time with things like value objects and pre-compiled images. But for raw power it probably can't ever beat Go ... and it doesn't have to, it just needs to be good enough.I think you made a very good point with your comparison, but I think there is another parameter - availability of talent. While my company is moving towards Java, our Swedish counterparts chose Go. Our reasoning is that with Java being big with the financial sector and the public sector, there will be a larger selection to choose from. Meanwhile, the Swedes I talked to spoke of a different trend, that people who are doing front-end development in JavaScript are also moving into modern backend languages like Go and Rust.
Spring Boot is constantly evolving, 4.x brings a lot towards performance and startup time, and if you invest some additional time into it, it is possible to get very juicy numbers. But it's true - the more niversal tool is, the more overhead it has. And spring is very universal tool.