𝐑𝐮𝐛𝐲 𝐂𝐚𝐧 𝐁𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐁𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐬 (𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐞𝐛 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐬) Most people think Ruby = Rails. But Ruby can build terminal tools that feel like: • Git • Docker • npm Interactive. Colorful. Polished. With Thor for command structure and the TTY Toolkit for prompts, spinners, and progress bars… You can turn a simple script into a professional-grade CLI in minutes. Add styling with colorize, and suddenly your tool feels production-ready. Ruby isn’t just for the web. It’s one of the fastest ways to build developer tools people actually enjoy using. #ruby #devtools #cli #opensource
Ruby Builds CLI Tools Beyond Web Apps
More Relevant Posts
-
A single file decides where every request in a Django application goes. When I first opened the urls.py file in a Django project, it looked like just another configuration file sitting quietly in the project. But the more I explored it, the clearer its importance became. Every request that reaches a web application follows a specific path. Those paths are mapped to views, and those views determine how the application responds. In many ways, urls.py works like a navigation system behind the scenes, directing incoming traffic to the right destination. The deeper I go into backend development, the more I realize how many invisible systems work together to make even simple features function properly. Every layer reveals how much coordination happens behind the scenes. Still connecting the dots. Day 12 of showing up. #GIT20DayChallenge #AfricaAgility #Day12 #GrowthMindset #BackendDevelopment #LinkedInChallenge
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Rust is faster than TypeScript. Except when it isn't. A team at OpenUI swapped their Rust WASM parser for a TypeScript rewrite — and got 2.2x to 4.6x faster performance. The Rust code stayed the same. It just no longer ran. Here's what actually happened: Rust was never the bottleneck. Every call crossed the WASM-JavaScript boundary, which meant copying strings between memory spaces, serializing to JSON, copying results back, and deserializing in V8. That overhead dwarfed any gains from compiled code. When they moved to TypeScript, V8's JIT compiler handled the computation fast enough that Rust's native speed advantage stopped mattering. Then they fixed the real problem: an O(N²) algorithm hiding in the caching layer. Switching to O(N) caching gave the largest speedup by far — not the language change. This is the pattern I see constantly in engineering decisions. Teams spend months optimizing the wrong layer. They pick the "faster" technology, skip the profiling, and end up slower than a naive implementation in the "slower" one. Measure first. Profile before you choose your stack. The bottleneck is almost never where you think it is. The engineers who compound fastest aren't the ones who know the most languages — they're the ones who know where the actual cost is. What's the most counterintuitive performance lesson you've learned building software? #SoftwareEngineering #Performance #WebDevelopment #Rust #JavaScript #Engineering #TechLeadership Join Agentic Engineering Club → t.me/villson_hub
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
We've been experimenting with Claude Code on real-life projects. Our CEO, Robby Russell, shares some of our team's learnings on things like model selection, debugging with error monitoring payloads, and ways to structure Claude.md without breaking everything or making TOO big of a mess. Plus, he includes a "Claude Code for Rails Developers Resource Guide" that a few developers have already found helpful! https://lnkd.in/eT2RRuSf
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
After 7 years of writing TypeScript, I still see the same pattern trip up even experienced devs: over-relying on `any` as an escape hatch instead of modeling uncertainty properly. The fix is usually one of these three: 1. Use `unknown` instead of `any`. It forces you to narrow the type before using the value. Safer, and it documents intent. 2. Use discriminated unions when a value can be one of several shapes. The compiler will catch exhaustiveness gaps for you at compile time, not at 2am in production. 3. Use template literal types for stringly-typed APIs. Instead of `string`, write `${string}-id` or a union of valid strings. Suddenly your editor catches typos you never would have caught in review. The shift I had to make mentally was treating TypeScript not as a linter on top of JS, but as a way to encode business rules in the type system itself. Once you do that, the compiler becomes your senior engineer who never sleeps. Still learning this every day. What's a TypeScript pattern that changed how you think about code? Drop it in the comments. #TypeScript #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #FullStack #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Simplifying API Calls in Redux with createAsyncThunk. Earlier, we had to write too much boilerplate for API calls in Redux. Handling: #loading #success #error …meant creating multiple action types, action creators, and reducers. Then I started using createAsyncThunk from Redux Toolkit 👇 It automatically generates: #pending #fulfilled #rejected So instead of writing everything manually, you just focus on the async logic. Example: export const fetchUsers = createAsyncThunk( "users/fetchUsers", async () => { const res = await fetch("https://lnkd.in/g27u5z_N"); return res.json(); } ); And handle states cleanly in extraReducers. 🔥 What I like about it: Reduces boilerplate significantly Makes async flow predictable Cleaner and more readable code 💬 What do you use for API calls in your projects? #React #Redux #Frontend #WebDevelopment #JavaScript #WebArchitecture #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚡ React Performance: The 10x Difference is in the Details! Just ran a quick experiment that perfectly illustrates why memoization matters in React. Same component, same data transformation - but the performance difference is staggering: ❌ SLOW: 2.5 seconds → Recalculates on EVERY render → New function created each time → Unnecessary computational overhead ✅ FAST: 0.2 seconds (10x faster!) → useMemo caches the result → Only recalculates when [data] changes → Function reference remains stable The code difference? Just a few lines. The impact? 2.3 seconds saved per render. Key takeaway: Don't let your components do expensive calculations repeatedly when they don't need to. useMemo and useCallback aren't just fancy hooks - they're performance game-changers when used strategically. What's your biggest React performance win? Share below! 👇 #ReactJS #WebDevelopment #PerformanceOptimization #FrontendDevelopment #JavaScript #CodingTips #WebDev #ReactHooks #Programming #TechTips
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
flat vs flatMap flat: 1* Used to "flatten" nested array. 2* By default, .flat() only goes one level deep. Using Infinity it goes to all levels 3* flat(depth) flatMap: 1* It is a combination of .map() followed by .flat(1). 2* It’s more efficient than doing a map and a flat separately because it only iterates through the list once. 3* flatMap(callback) const flatFunc = (list) => { return list.flat(Infinity) }; console.log(flatFunc([1,2,3,[4,[5,[6]]]])); // [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ] const flatMapFunc = (list) => { return list.flatMap((item) => item.split(" ")) } console.log(flatMapFunc(["Hello JavaScript", "Hey TypeScript"])); //[ 'Hello', 'JavaScript', 'Hey', 'TypeScript' ] #JavaScript #WebDev #CodingTips #Frontend #SoftwareEngineering #LearnToCode #JSShorts #Programming #100DaysOfCode #CleanCode #WebDevelopment #JavaScriptDeveloper #TechTips #MaheshCheema
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Solved the classic Queue using Two Stacks problem today. Revisited the core idea of simulating FIFO behavior using LIFO structures by deferring transfers until necessary. This ensures an amortized O(1) time complexity for operations, even though individual operations may occasionally take O(n). Key takeaways: Lazy transfer is the optimization — only move elements when needed Push remains O(1), while pop/peek leverage stack reversal Amortized analysis is crucial for understanding real performance #DataStructures #Algorithms #JavaScript #LeetCode #ProblemSolving #CodingPractice
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
If you're still manually writing useMemo and useCallback everywhere, you might be optimizing for a problem that no longer exists. The React Compiler hit v1.0 in late 2025. What that means in practice: memoization is now handled at build time, automatically. The compiler analyzes your component tree and decides what to cache. You don't have to. Which means a lot of the useMemo(...) scattered across codebases today is either redundant — or worse — masking component design issues that should have been fixed instead. I've been thinking about how much time I've spent on manual memoization over the years. Not just writing it, but debugging stale closures, wrong dependency arrays, and explaining to every new dev why wrapping a click handler in useCallback probably isn't helping. If you're starting a new React project right now: test with the compiler first. Optimize manually only where the profiler tells you to. The shift isn't just about tooling — it's about what "thinking in React" actually means now. What's your team's current stance on the React Compiler in production? #React #TypeScript #FrontendDevelopment #WebDev #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stop writing your own Zod schemas and TS interfaces. 🛑 I just launched **API Mock UI** — a lightweight IDE that turns any JSON response into production-ready code in seconds. Why I built this: • Copy-pasting JSON is fast; typing interfaces is slow. • MSW handlers should be generated, not hand-coded. • Visualizing data structures helps catch errors early. Give it a spin (it's free and open source): 🔗 https://lnkd.in/g72p5W3g Let me know what you think! 🚀 #frontend #javascript #programming #tools
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore related topics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development