Interesting take on the effect of AI driven software development on repositories, and GitHub more specifically— it seems that the added workload stemming from a huge increase in push and pull requests is pushing the infrastructure beyond its limits, resulting in much more frequent downtime.
GitHub Downtime Surges Due to AI Driven Dev Workload
More Relevant Posts
-
GitHub adds Stacked PRs to speed complex code reviews A new feature to facilitate code reviews and prepare for an AI-driven surge in code changes. My PoV included in InfoWorld news today. https://lnkd.in/gF9kzM42
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Elevating Code Review: GitHub’s Breakthrough in Diff Rendering Performance At AllSafeUs Research Labs, we constantly monitor advancements in developer tooling, recognizing their profound impact on security, productivity, and overall software quality. A recent announcement from GitHub, titled "The uphill climb of making diff lines performant," caught our attention, highlighting a crucial area often overlooked: the fundamental performance of code review tools. This initiative underscores a significant step towards optimizing the developer experience by tackling the intrinsic complexities of rendering code differences (diffs)....
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Today, I'm excited to announce the public release of SynapCLI-a lightweight, zero-lock-in CLI that lets you pull, update, and manage individual files or folders from any public GitHub repo—no monorepo required, no package publishing, no convoluted setup. It’s designed for the way developers actually work. Ready to simplify file sharing and standardization for your team? Check out SynapCLI on GitHub: https://lnkd.in/gH3wxX7H or npm package @smartmarbles/synapcli
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Claude Code forgets everything when the session ends. Someone just fixed that. For free. On GitHub. The repo is called claude-mem. It is a Claude Code plugin that automatically captures everything Claude does during your coding sessions, compresses it using Claude's agent SDK, and injects the relevant context back into future sessions automatically. No manual copy-paste. No re-explaining your codebase. No context-window-reset tax every time you start a new conversation. Here is why this matters more than it sounds. Every Claude Code session you start without memory is a session where Claude has to rediscover your project. Your naming conventions. Your architecture decisions. The bugs you already fixed. The patterns you are following. You explain this once. Then again. Then again. That is not just token waste. It is the single biggest friction point in agentic coding workflows. claude-mem removes that friction entirely. It captures what happened. Compresses it intelligently. Injects only the relevant parts back in when they are needed. Your future sessions start with context instead of from scratch. The three things this actually changes in practice. Token costs drop significantly because you are not re-uploading your full project context every session. Continuity across sessions means Claude builds on previous decisions instead of reversing them. And multi-session projects become coherent instead of feeling like Claude has amnesia every morning. This is a community-built open source tool, not an official Anthropic release. That means a developer hit a real problem, built a real solution, and put it on GitHub for everyone. Link in the comments. Star it. This one is worth watching. What part of your Claude Code workflow loses the most context right now? #ClaudeCode #AIAutomation #BuildWithAI #AgenticAI #AIFLOXIUM
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
GitHub was built for 10 engineers pushing 100 commits a week. Your AI agents don't care about that constraint. We've watched teams hit API rate limits before their morning standup. We've watched latency kill agent feedback loops mid-task - the agent is waiting on a response while context evaporates. We've watched the world's most important developer platform strain under a workload it was never designed for. GitHub is remarkable software but it was designed for humans. The gap between "designed for humans" and "works for agents" is enormous: → Rate limits tuned for human hands, not automated pipelines → CI latency acceptable for a dev refreshing a PR, catastrophic for an agent mid-loop → Review interfaces built for human eyes, not machine-readable output → No native concept of agent identity or trust The infra layer for the agentic era isn't GitHub with a better API wrapper. It's a new primitive. Built from scratch. For machines. Guess what? That's what we're building with @Mesa.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you're new to contributing on GitHub and looking for a good starting point to solve real world issues, Use this search query inside GitHub: label:"good first issue" language:"yourPreferredLanguage" You'll see real codebases, read production code, and understand how software is actually built. I'm finding this 10x better than solving isolated problems.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
How GitHub Copilot Runs Safely in Docker Sandbox with MicroVMs Click here for source https://lnkd.in/get9BvdN Do you want to know more click here https://lnkd.in/exH3zxjM GitHub Copilot + MicroVMs via Docker Sandbox explained! In this video, I show how a local GitHub Copilot agent can run inside an isolated Docker Sandbox powered by MicroVMs for safer AI coding and agentic refactoring. You’ll learn how Docker Sandbox gives GitHub Copilot access to a private Docker daemon inside a MicroVM, so you can build images, modernizing legacy applications. I also cover how Docker Sandbox helps preserve the same workspace paths across the host and sandbox, why that matters for real projects, and how this setup can support GitHub Copilot CLI workflows with better isolation, security, and developer productivity. If you want to understand GitHub Copilot, MicroVMs, Docker Sandbox, secure AI coding agents, and agentic refactoring in a practical way, this video is for you. Topics covered: - github copilot - local github copilot agent - microvms - docker sandbox - github copilot cli - agentic refactoring - secure ai coding - docker build and docker compose in sandbox - legacy app modernization - docker desktop sandbox workflow github copilot github copilot cli github copilot tutorial github copilot explained github copilot agent local github copilot agent github copilot microvms github copilot docker sandbox microvms microvm docker sandbox docker sandboxes docker sandbox tutorial docker sandbox explained docker desktop docker build docker compose ai coding agent ai coding assistant agentic refactoring secure ai coding secure coding agent local ai agent sandboxed ai agent private docker daemon isolated docker daemon docker socket risk no docker socket secure docker workflow legacy code modernization java modernization dotnet modernization containerized testing secure developer workflow microvm isolation github copilot local setup docker sandbox copilot github copilot docker desktop modernizing legacy apps ai refactoring #githubcopilot #microvms #dockersandbox #githubcopilotcli #localgithubcopilotagent #agenticrefactoring #aicoding #secureaicoding #dockertutorial #dockerdesktop #microvm #sandbox #dockerbuild #dockercompose #legacycodemodernization
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Zero is an AI engineering OS. It runs locally. Built in Rust. It sits across your entire stack. You can pull in work directly from GitHub Issues, GitLab, Jira, Sentry, Bitbucket. Zero turns all of that into one thing: a case. One system, one state machine, one place where work actually happens. A Sentry error, a Jira ticket, a GitHub issue, it doesn’t matter. Same workflow. Same agent. Same proof-gated resolution. Here’s how it works in practice. You open a case (or import a case from Github, Sentry, Jira..etc). An agent picks it up and starts running sessions. It proposes tasks, writes code in isolated git worktrees, and nothing touches your branch without your approval. Every task needs proof before it can close. Tests, logs, screenshots, whatever makes it real. If a proof is missing, the case simply doesn’t resolve. That’s enforced at the system level, not a guideline people ignore. Cases move through a real state machine: OPEN → INVESTIGATING → IMPLEMENTING → VERIFYING → RESOLVED No manual tracking. Transitions happen automatically. You can see the full timeline, why something moved, what it’s waiting on, and what’s blocking it. You also get signals: health, staleness, blockers, decision hints. The system tells you exactly what’s going on instead of making you guess. Under the hood, it’s all real infrastructure. SSE streaming, isolated worktrees, GitHub PR integration, built-in terminal, Monaco editor, multiple agents running in parallel, and shared memory injected into every session. It ships as a native macOS app on Apple Silicon using Tauri. Intel and Linux are coming. Private beta is live at zero.polymathlabs.xyz. DM me for an invitation code.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
You write a GitHub Issue. You set a label. You grab a coffee. The Guild takes it from there. Five agents. Each one knows its job. Guild.Scribe turns the issue into a spec. Architecture decisions, edge cases, acceptance criteria. Written before a single line of code is touched. Guild.Smith builds. Reads the spec, opens a branch, writes the code, opens the PR. Guild.Warden reviews. Not alone. Three independent perspectives on the same PR. AI systems are prone to groupthink. Three voices break that. After the merge, Warden looks again. Backend test coverage, Storybook coverage, deferred findings, AI code verbosity. Everything that slipped through goes into a backlog. The Guild picks it up. Guild.Seal merges. Watches CI, waits for green, closes the loop. Guild.Werkstatt orchestrates. Reads the label, picks the next agent, passes the baton. The state machine is GitHub labels. Not a custom dashboard. Not a proprietary format. Just labels. Visible in the UI, adjustable by humans. Because the system should work for you, not trap you. If something goes wrong, the system stops and escalates. No zombie jobs. No infinite loops. A clean handoff back to the human. The whole thing runs in Discord and on GitHub. Every agent logs its own work, in real time. Not because it had to. Because transparency was a design choice. You can watch it happen. Most days you want to. It makes you feel like a hacker. But you don't need to. Next post: 98 pull requests. The numbers tell their own story.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
It's pure magic to observe this. What Björn is showing here isn't a side project. It's our production system. Five agents that turn a GitHub Issue into shipped code, it is specced, built, reviewed, tested, merged. No human in the loop unless something breaks. For us that means: we ship features in hours, not weeks. Two founders, no team, enterprise-grade output. And this exact setup is what we build for our clients. AI Enablement at Brumm Labs doesn't mean a slide deck with "transformation" on it. It means we show you how to get more done with fewer people. Because we do it ourselves. Every day. Burn token, burn!
You write a GitHub Issue. You set a label. You grab a coffee. The Guild takes it from there. Five agents. Each one knows its job. Guild.Scribe turns the issue into a spec. Architecture decisions, edge cases, acceptance criteria. Written before a single line of code is touched. Guild.Smith builds. Reads the spec, opens a branch, writes the code, opens the PR. Guild.Warden reviews. Not alone. Three independent perspectives on the same PR. AI systems are prone to groupthink. Three voices break that. After the merge, Warden looks again. Backend test coverage, Storybook coverage, deferred findings, AI code verbosity. Everything that slipped through goes into a backlog. The Guild picks it up. Guild.Seal merges. Watches CI, waits for green, closes the loop. Guild.Werkstatt orchestrates. Reads the label, picks the next agent, passes the baton. The state machine is GitHub labels. Not a custom dashboard. Not a proprietary format. Just labels. Visible in the UI, adjustable by humans. Because the system should work for you, not trap you. If something goes wrong, the system stops and escalates. No zombie jobs. No infinite loops. A clean handoff back to the human. The whole thing runs in Discord and on GitHub. Every agent logs its own work, in real time. Not because it had to. Because transparency was a design choice. You can watch it happen. Most days you want to. It makes you feel like a hacker. But you don't need to. Next post: 98 pull requests. The numbers tell their own story.
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
- How AI Factories Are Changing Infrastructure
- How AI Can Reduce Developer Workload
- The Impact of AI on Vibe Coding
- How AI Impacts the Role of Human Developers
- How AI Demand Is Changing IT Infrastructure
- How AI is Changing Software Delivery
- How AI Agents Are Changing Software Development
- AI Workloads and Search Engine Limitations
- Impact of AI on Human Programmers
- AI's Impact on Coding Productivity
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development