Alexandru Ivanov’s Post

View profile for Alexandru Ivanov

Senior Java Full-Stack Contractor Remote · Spring Boot · Angular · React · B2B Contract

After 8 years of building Java systems, one pattern saved me more  debugging time than anything else. It's not a framework. It's not a library. It's how you structure communication between your microservices. Early in my career I defaulted to synchronous REST calls between  services. It felt natural — call a service, get a response, move on. The problem? In a microservices architecture, this creates invisible  chains. One slow service slows everything. One down service takes  others with it. The shift that changed everything for me: defaulting to async  communication first and only using sync when you genuinely need  an immediate response. With Kafka or RabbitMQ: - Services are decoupled — failures don't cascade - You can replay events if something goes wrong - The system scales independently per service - Debugging becomes dramatically easier with proper event logs The rule I follow now: "If the caller doesn't need the result immediately — make it async." Sounds simple. Most teams still don't do it by default. #Java #SpringBoot #Microservices #SoftwareArchitecture #BackendDevelopment

Petr Puzanov

Backend Java Developer (5+ years experience) | Spring Boot | Microservices | High-Load Systems | Kubernetes | AWS | Tokyo, Japan | Ready to Relocate

1mo

Async-first is powerful, but comes with its own complexity — idempotency, retries, eventual consistency. Worth it, but teams often underestimate that part.

It's how WE communicate! Sync is needed only in certain cases. Async all the way. Even when your wife tells you "can you come for a bit" - it's async :D you can go right away but it's most likely not that urgent.

At which volume did you observe invisible chains becoming bottlenecks?

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories