Our reporting app was slow, complex, and hard to debug. Every calculation lived inside Blazor pages, making the UI bloated and the team bottlenecked. Here’s how I redesigned it to be faster, cleaner, and scalable… 🔎 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀 pulled entire datasets into Blazor. 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰 and calculations were scattered across UI code. 𝗗𝗲𝗯𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 was painful, and only full-stack engineers could contribute. ⚙️ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 Shifted all calculations into SQL Server 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀. Leveraged advanced SQL features (𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗥𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗨𝗣) to generate hierarchical structures directly. Returned results as 𝗝𝗦𝗢𝗡, consumed by a single controller. Blazor pages became display-only, powered by reusable recursive components. 📈 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗕𝗹𝗮𝘇𝗼𝗿 code reduced to pure display logic → simpler, reusable, and maintainable. 𝗗𝗲𝗯𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 moved to SQL layer → faster validation. 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 unlocked: SQL 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁 handles queries. 𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱 developer focuses on UI. 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗿 works on HTML/CSS. 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 ensures business logic integrity. This refactor taught me that future-proofing isn’t just about technology — it’s about designing systems where teams can grow without friction. By moving logic closer to the data and simplifying the UI, we achieved both performance and collaboration gains #dotnet #blazor #sqlserver #softwarearchitecture #systemdesign #leadership #scalability
Blazor App Redesign: Faster, Cleaner, Scalable
More Relevant Posts
-
🚀 Lately, I’ve been diving deeper into TanStack Query (React Query) and honestly, it’s been a game changer for handling server state in React apps. If you’ve ever struggled with: ❌ Managing loading, error, and success states manually ❌ Re-fetching data after mutations ❌ Caching and syncing server data with UI ❌ Writing repetitive API logic Then TanStack Query solves all of this beautifully. 💡 What makes it powerful: • Automatic caching → reduces unnecessary API calls • Background refetching → keeps data fresh without extra effort • Built-in loading & error handling → cleaner UI logic • Optimistic updates → instant UI feedback for better UX • Devtools support → super helpful for debugging ⚡ What stood out to me: Instead of thinking in terms of “when to call APIs”, you start thinking in terms of “what data does my UI need”. TanStack Query takes care of the rest. 📌 Simple example: useQuery → fetch & cache data useMutation → update server state + auto sync This shift significantly improves: ✅ Code readability ✅ Performance ✅ Developer experience If you’re building React apps and still managing server state manually, I’d highly recommend exploring TanStack Query. Definitely a must-have tool in a modern full-stack developer’s toolkit 💯 #React #TanStackQuery #WebDevelopment #Frontend #FullStack #JavaScript #DeveloperExperience
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🔗 Bridging the Gap: Data Flow & Error Boundaries in Full-Stack Development Building a sleek UI is one thing; making it "talk" to a robust backend is where the real engineering begins. This week, I’ve been deep-diving into API Integration, specifically connecting my FastAPI backend with a React frontend for my latest projects. Here’s a breakdown of the challenges I faced and the architectural solutions I implemented. 🚩 The Challenge: Asynchronous Chaos & Memory Leaks When dealing with asynchronous data fetching, it’s easy to run into "race conditions" or memory leaks. A common issue occurs when a component attempts to update its state after it has already been unmounted, or when multiple API calls overlap, leading to inconsistent UI states. 🛠️ The Solution: Controlled Fetching with Hooks & Axios To solve this, I leveraged the useEffect hook combined with Axios to create a structured data flow. Cleanup Functions: I implemented abort controllers to ensure that if a user navigates away, pending requests are cancelled, preventing memory leaks. State Management: Utilizing loading, data, and error states to provide immediate visual feedback to the user. Status Code Logic: Moving beyond simple "success/fail" by handling specific HTTP status codes: 200 (OK): Smooth data rendering. 404 (Not Found): Redirecting to custom "Resource Not Found" views. 500 (Server Error): Implementing graceful fallbacks and error boundaries. 💡 Key Takeaway API integration isn't just about moving data; it’s about predictability. By treating error handling as a core feature rather than an afterthought, we create applications that are resilient and user-friendly. I’m currently applying these patterns to my Face Recognition and Shopping Portal projects to ensure they are production ready. #Python #FastAPI #ReactJS #WebDevelopment #FullStack #SoftwareEngineering #LearningPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
CRUD works. Production doesn’t care. When I started as a full-stack developer, I believed : If the API works → the job is done. UI renders. Database saves. Feature shipped. But learning system design changed how I think. Most applications don’t fail because of syntax errors. They fail because of architectural decisions. • Missing database indexes • No caching layer • No rate limiting • No pagination strategy • No failure planning Shipping fast is easy. Designing something that survives real traffic is different. Scaling requires: • Thoughtful query design • A clear caching strategy • Stateless APIs • Load awareness • Planning for failure before it happens The biggest mindset shift for me? I stopped asking : “Does it work?” And started asking : “What breaks under load?” Building for scale, not just for demo. What changed the way you think about backend systems? #SystemDesign #FullStackDeveloper #BackendDevelopment #ScalableSystems #SoftwareArchitecture #WebEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝐈𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮'𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐰𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐦𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐓𝐲𝐩𝐞𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭, 𝐲𝐨𝐮'𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐮𝐭. I've seen so many React components become any-land when trying to build reusable utilities that operate on object shapes. Like a generic Picker component that takes an array of objects and needs to extract a specific id or name field, but only if that field exists. The magic often lies in properly constraining your generics. Instead of `function getProperty<T>(obj: T, key: string)` (which loses all type safety for `key`), try `extends keyof T`. Example: ```typescript function pickProperty<T extends Record<string, any>, K extends keyof T>( items: T[], key: K ): T[K][] { return items.map(item => item[key]); } // Usage: interface User { id: string; name: string; email: string; } const users: User[] = [ /* ... */ ]; const userIds = pickProperty(users, 'id'); // Type: string[] // pickProperty(users, 'address'); // TS Error: 'address' does not exist on type 'User' ``` Here, `T extends Record<string, any>` ensures `T` is an object, and `K extends keyof T` makes sure `key` is a valid property of `T`. This gives you strong type inference and compiler errors where you need them. This pattern is a lifesaver for building type-safe, reusable data transformations in your React/Next.js applications, especially when dealing with API responses that share common structures. What's your go-to pattern for keeping object manipulations type-safe without falling back to any? Share your thoughts below! #TypeScript #React #FrontendDevelopment #Generics #WebDev
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Slow React vs Fast React — 2.5s to 0.2s Same component. Same data. 2.5 second render time vs 0.2 seconds. The difference is three React optimization patterns most developers skip. -> The slow version Re-fetches data on every single render. No dependency array control on useEffect. No memoization anywhere. The heavy child component re-renders every time the parent updates even when nothing it depends on has changed. The UI thread gets blocked during computation. Result: 2.5 second render. Users wait. Users leave. -> The fast version — three changes First: fetch once on mount. Add an isMounted flag to your useEffect and an empty dependency array. The data fetches once when the component mounts, not on every render. A cleanup function prevents state updates on unmounted components which eliminates memory leak warnings. Second: useMemo for expensive calculations. Wrap any computation that processes large datasets in useMemo with the correct dependencies. The calculation only runs when the data it depends on actually changes — not on every render. const processedData = useMemo(() => data?.map(item => ({...item, result: heavyCalculation(item.value)})), [data] ); Third: React.memo prevents unnecessary child re-renders. Wrap the component in React.memo and it only re-renders when its props actually change. If the parent re-renders for unrelated reasons, the child stays untouched. Result: 0.2 second render. 92 percent faster. Same functionality. These three patterns — controlled useEffect, useMemo, and React.memo — are not advanced React. They are standard React. But most components in production codebases are missing at least one of them. Performance is not something you add at the end. It is something you build correctly from the start. What React performance optimization made the biggest difference in a project you worked on? #React #Performance #JavaScript #FrontendDevelopment #WebDevelopment #Developers #ReactHooks
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most systems treat phone numbers as just strings… until things start breaking. Different formats, inconsistent validation, messy APIs, and UI confusion — all because something as simple as a phone number wasn’t designed properly. Recently, I worked on structuring phone handling using a centralized utility approach instead of scattering logic across models, services, or controllers. Here’s the key idea :- Instead of storing and handling phone numbers randomly, we: • Normalize everything into a standard format (E.164 → +201012345678) • Accept flexible input (country_code + number OR legacy formats) • Parse and format consistently for APIs and dashboards • Keep backward compatibility without changing the database Why not put this inside a Service? Because this is NOT business logic. A Service should answer questions like: “How do we process a payment?” “How do we authenticate a user?” But phone formatting is: A reusable, low-level utility concern That’s why placing it inside a Support layer makes more sense. Why not inside a Model? If we attach this logic to a model like User: -It becomes tightly coupled -It can’t be reused across other entities (Coach, Organization, etc.) Phone handling is cross-cutting — it belongs everywhere, not somewhere. Why Support / Utility Layer? Because it is: ✅ Stateless (pure functions) ✅ Reusable across the entire system ✅ Independent from business logic ✅ Clean and testable Think of it as a “system-wide tool”, not a feature. Real Example: Input: { "country_code": "+20", "phone_number": "1012345678" } Stored: +201012345678 API Output: { "country_code": "+20", "number": "1012345678" } One source of truth. No duplication. No confusion. The takeaway: Good architecture is not about where code works… It’s about where code BELONGS. Separating utilities from business logic: • improves scalability • reduces bugs • keeps your codebase clean as it grows #Laravel #BackendDevelopment #SoftwareArchitecture #CleanCode #PHP #WebDevelopment #APIDesign #SystemDesign #CodingBestPractices #Developers #Tech
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
When playing around with, and creating Next.js Server Actions I had to rewire my brain in real-time to understand working with errors as values after working with try/catch for so long.
Stop using try/catch for expected business logic 🔴 I was auditing a Next.js backend for a client recently. Their logs were full of unhandled promise rejections and 500 errors. I tracked it down to their core utility functions. Every time a validation failed, the code did this: • `throw new Error("Insufficient funds")` • `throw new Error("Invalid date")` This is what I call "Exception-Driven Development" which means using exceptions for control flow. It feels like standard JavaScript, but it creates a massive architectural flaw: ❌ TypeScript does NOT track what a function throws. ▶️ The function signature lies: It says it returns string, but it might throw instead. ▶️ Hidden control flow: `throw` acts like an invisible GOTO statement. ▶️ App crashes: If the caller forgets try/catch, your App explodes. So, I refactored their core actions using the "Result Pattern" (inspired by Rust & Go). Look at the code below 👇 Instead of throwing errors, I return them as values. I created a discriminated union: `{ success: true, data } | { success: false, error }`. Why is this better? Because now, the compiler is doing the work. When a developer calls `processPayment()`, TypeScript physically prevents them from accessing `.data` until they check `if (!result.success)` first. No more guessing. No more missing try/catch blocks. No more 500 errors. ✍ My personal rule: Use `throw` for fatal system failures (DB down, out of memory, config missing). Use `Result<T>` for expected business errors (invalid input, insufficient funds). If it's part of normal operations, it's not exceptional. 💡 My question to you: Do you throw your business errors, or do you return them as data? #TypeScript #NextJS #Architecture #CleanCode #SoftwareEngineering #WebDevelopment #Backend #ErrorHandling
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Frontend developers waste hours on a task that shouldn't exist. You get API data back. It's nested. It's inconsistent. Three different endpoints return IDs as id, userId, and user_id. Before you can build a single component, you're writing transformation logic, manually. Every. Single. Time. So I built apinormaliser.com to kill this entirely. Paste your API responses. The tool: → Normalises keys to camelCase → Flattens and deduplicates nested structures → Merges multiple responses into one clean schema → Generates TypeScript interfaces → Outputs React Query hooks, ready to drop in Zero manual transformation. Zero inconsistency. Based on my own testing, it cuts the data-wrangling phase by 60–70% in typical workflows. That's real time back to your sprint. If you work across multiple APIs or inherited a messy backend, try it free → apinormaliser.com Always looking to make it better. Drop a comment with any features you'd want to see or things you'd improve. All feedback welcome. #Frontend #TypeScript #React #DeveloperTools #OpenToWork
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Handling API Requests Like a Pro (Fetch + AbortController) Fetching data is easy — managing requests properly is where real frontend engineering starts. Here’s how I handle it 👇 🧠 Basic Fetch const res = await fetch("/api/data") const data = await res.json() ⚠️ Problem: What if the user navigates away or types quickly (search input)? 👉 Multiple requests = wasted resources + race conditions 🛑 AbortController (Cancel Requests) const controller = new AbortController() fetch("/api/data", { signal: controller.signal }) controller.abort() // cancels request ⚡ Real-World Use Case Search input: let controller async function search(query) { if (controller) controller.abort() controller = new AbortController() const res = await fetch(`/search?q=${query}`, { signal: controller.signal }) const data = await res.json() console.log(data) } 💡 Why It Matters • Prevents unnecessary API calls • Avoids race conditions • Improves performance • Better user experience 🎯 Takeaway: Good apps don’t just fetch data — they control when and how requests run. Building smarter and more efficient data-fetching patterns. 💪 #JavaScript #FetchAPI #FrontendDeveloper #Performance #MERNStack #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Streams in Node.js Guide Handling large data efficiently in Node.js is easier with streams 🚀. Instead of loading everything into memory, streams process data in chunks, improving performance and scalability. Whether you're building file processors, real-time apps, or data pipelines, understanding streams can drastically optimize your backend. Explore how readable, writable, duplex, and transform streams work in practice and why they matter for high-performance applications. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/dvhWgq8W #NodeJS #BackendDevelopment #WebDevelopment #Programming #JavaScript #TechTips
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development