Aditya Anand’s Post

Debugging doesn’t start in the debugger. It starts in your head. When something breaks, most developers do this: jump to logs → scan random code → guess. That’s why debugging feels slow. This is the actual order I follow while debugging C++ or managed applications: • First, reproduce the issue reliably • Then, understand what changed, not what failed • Question every assumption you’re making • Narrow down execution paths aggressively • Only then look for the root cause Tools don’t fix bugs. Clear thinking does. Once you control the scope, most bugs become boring. And boring bugs are easy to fix. This mindset matters far more than knowing any specific debugger shortcut. Agree or disagree? #SoftwareEngineering #Debugging #Cpp #DeveloperMindset

  • diagram

Hmmm... I feel that there are 2 uses of the term root cause. 1) First artefact (upstream) that has a defect/error that directly or indirectly caused the test/QA measure/end user to indicate a problem. 2) Tree of causes ehy that artefact became defective in the first place. (Result of a root cause analysis) To fix tge bug one need 1). 2) is the result of a RCA process triggered by problem resolution (among others), but can run independently. 1) helps to fix bugs. 2) helps to prevent them.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories