World Resources Institute’s Post

⚠️A proposed 'no-risk' category to #EUDR could reduce the regulation’s effectiveness significantly⚠️ Here's why👇 At the end of April, the European Commission will publish its simplification review of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), a landmark law designed to curb deforestation globally. Various interest groups are increasing pressure to reopen or weaken key provisions. Many are focused on the idea of introducing a no-risk category to the law’s country benchmarking system. But this category would undermine the regulation's efforts, creating laundering loopholes and adding more uncertainty for businesses. 🌲We outline why a no-risk category jeopardizes the EUDR’s effectiveness: https://bit.ly/4vnlN7S

  • No alternative text description for this image

Genuinely curious about the other side of this argument, what's the strongest case for a no-risk category? Is there a version of it that could work without creating loopholes, or is the concept itself fundamentally incompatible with a regulation built on traceability and accountability? Trying to understand where the pressure is actually coming from.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories