🔥 Day 69 — “Strings, Structure & Strategy.” 🧩💡 Theme: Strings × Dynamic Programming Today’s challenges tested precision in pairing logic with layers — where every substring, sequence, and selection demanded careful calculation. Dynamic Programming once again became the art of 'balancing time, value, and possibility.' 💻 What I Solved: 🔹 Count Repetitions — (Hard) ✅ 150/150 — finding hidden rhythm within repeated patterns. 🔹 Optimized Washing — (Hard) ✅ 150/150 — time and efficiency woven through clean DP logic. 🔹 Removal of String — (Hard) ⏳ 38/150 — untangling overlaps one substring at a time. 🔹 Maximum Number of Events That Can Be Attended II — (Hard) ⏳ 113/150 — strategizing choices with weighted intervals. 🎯 Key Learnings: * Every DP decision carries a cost — 'choose wisely, gain maximally.' * In Strings, removing one character can change the entire state. * Optimization isn’t speed alone — it’s clarity in constraint. 📊 Leaderboard Update: 🏆 Points: 31,183+ 🏅 Rank: 122 💬 From the coder’s desk: > “Where strings connect and choices collide, > logic finds its rhythm — and patterns come alive.” 🎶💻 Join me on Unstop 👉 https://lnkd.in/gRFmWUyA #100DaysOfCode #Day69 #CodingJourney #Unstop
"Day 69: Strings, Structure & Strategy with DP"
More Relevant Posts
-
🎯 LeetCode Daily – Triangle (Day 113) Today’s problem deepened my understanding of Dynamic Programming on Triangular Grids, focusing on minimizing path sums efficiently. ✅ My Approach: 🔹 Problem – Triangle: • The goal was to find the minimum path sum from the top to the bottom of a triangle array. • Used Memoization (Top-Down DP) to recursively explore all paths while storing intermediate results to avoid redundant computations. • Implemented Tabulation (Bottom-Up DP) to build the solution iteratively starting from the last row and moving upward, computing the minimum path for each position using values from the row below. 🧠 Key Insight: This problem beautifully demonstrates the power of Dynamic Programming in optimizing recursive solutions. By transitioning from memoization to tabulation, the problem transforms from exponential recursion to an elegant linear-time solution. Recognizing overlapping subproblems and optimal substructure patterns is key to mastering DP on grids and triangles. 📊 Time Complexity: O(N²) 📦 Space Complexity: O(N²) #LeetCode #DSA #DynamicProgramming #ProblemSolving #DailyCoding #LearningInPublic #Day113
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💡 Day 77 of #100DaysOfCode 💡 🔹 Problem: Majority Element – LeetCode ✨ Approach: Used a sorting-based strategy to quickly identify the majority element. By sorting the array, the middle element naturally becomes the majority — simple, clean, and surprisingly powerful! 🌟 📊 Complexity Analysis: ⏱ Time Complexity: O(n log n) — due to sorting 💾 Space Complexity: O(1) — constant auxiliary space ✅ Runtime: 7 ms (Beats 39.33%) ✅ Memory: 55.75 MB 🔑 Key Insight: Sometimes the smartest solution is also the simplest — a little ordering can reveal the dominant pattern hiding in plain sight. ✨ #LeetCode #100DaysOfCode #ProblemSolving #DSA #AlgorithmDesign #CodingDaily #ProgrammingChallenge #Sorting #LogicBuilding #CodeJourney
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🔥 Day 75 — “Arrays × DP: The Peaks of Precision.” 🌲⚙️ Theme: When structure meets optimization — arrays and dynamic programming align to reach new heights. 💻 What I Solved: 🔹 Highest Trees — (Hard) ✅ 150/150 — constructing balanced growth patterns through DP. 🔹 Weird Bitwise Queries — (Hard) ⏳ 88/150 — decoding binary puzzles with logical layering. 🔹 Product Identifier — (Hard) ✅ 150/150 — unique mapping of values with optimal traceability. 🔹 Maximizing Nutritional Value — (Hard) ✅ 150/150 — dynamic optimization meets real-world modeling. 🎯 Key Learnings: * Arrays give structure; DP adds memory — together they define 'efficiency with foresight'. * Bitwise logic often hides elegant mathematical simplicity. * Breaking big problems into smaller recurrences sharpens clarity and confidence. 📊 Progress Update: 🏆 Points: 33,440+ 🏅 Rank: 112 💬 From the coder’s desk: > “The deeper you dive into DP, the clearer logic becomes — > it’s not just about solving, it’s about *seeing patterns before they emerge*.” 🌊✨ Join me on Unstop 👉 https://lnkd.in/gRFmWUyA #100DaysOfCode #Day75 #CodingJourney #Unstop
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🌟 Day 71 of #100DaysOfCode 🌟 💡 Problem: Matrix Diagonal Sum – LeetCode ✨ Approach: Traversed both primary and secondary diagonals in a single loop — adding elements smartly while avoiding double-counting the center in odd-sized matrices. Simple logic, elegant optimization! ⚡ 📊 Complexity Analysis: Time Complexity: O(n) — single traversal through the matrix rows Space Complexity: O(1) — constant auxiliary space ✅ Runtime: 0 ms (Beats 100%🔥) ✅ Memory: 46.26 MB 🔑 Key Insight: In coding, clarity wins. The shortest paths often come from the clearest logic. 🎯 #LeetCode #100DaysOfCode #ProblemSolving #DSA #AlgorithmDesign #ProgrammingChallenge #CodeJourney #LogicBuilding #Efficiency #DeveloperGrowth #CodingDaily
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🔥 HyperRevision with Structure – Day 90 🔥 🧩 Problem solved today: 1️⃣ Redundant Connection (LeetCode 684) 💭 Thoughts: Concept almost similar to Valid Graph Tree. The complexity is O(N²) since the for loop takes another O(N). Not the most optimal solution, but it works. ⏱️ Time Complexity: O(N²) 💾 Space Complexity: O(N) 📌 GitHub link in comments #HyperRevision #NeetCode150 #GraphTraversal
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🎯 Day 81 of #100DaysOfCode 🎯 🔹 Problem: Reverse Only Letters – LeetCode ✨ Approach: Used a two-pointer strategy to reverse only the alphabetic characters while keeping all non-letter characters in their original positions. By moving pointers inward and swapping only when both characters are letters, the solution stays efficient and elegant! 🔄✨ 📊 Complexity Analysis: ⏱ Time Complexity: O(n) — each character visited at most once 💾 Space Complexity: O(n) — due to character array construction ✅ Runtime: 0 ms (Beats 100% 🚀) ✅ Memory: 42.96 MB 🔑 Key Insight: Sometimes, all you need is smart pointer movement — not everything needs to be reversed, only the right pieces. #LeetCode #100DaysOfCode #DSA #TwoPointers #StringManipulation #ProblemSolving #CleanCode #AlgorithmDesign #CodingChallenge
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🔗 Day 63 of #100DaysOfCode 🔗 🔹 Problem: Valid Parentheses – LeetCode ✨ Approach: Implemented a stack-based validation to ensure every opening bracket has a matching closing one in correct order. Each character is checked systematically — pushing opens and popping closes — making it both clean and efficient! ⚡ 📊 Complexity Analysis: Time Complexity: O(n) — single traversal of the string Space Complexity: O(n) — stack usage for unmatched brackets ✅ Runtime: 2 ms (Beats 97.47%) ✅ Memory: 41.96 MB 🔑 Key Insight: Stacks are the unsung heroes of structured logic — from parentheses validation to syntax parsing, they keep the balance just right. 🧠 #LeetCode #100DaysOfCode #ProblemSolving #DSA #Stack #AlgorithmDesign #CodeJourney #ProgrammingChallenge #LogicBuilding #Efficiency #CodingDaily
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Day 7 of #120DaysOfCode Challenge 💡 Problem: Reverse Integer (LeetCode #7 | Medium) 📄 Problem Statement: Given a signed 32-bit integer x, return x with its digits reversed. If reversing x causes it to go outside the signed 32-bit integer range [-2³¹, 2³¹ - 1], then return 0. 🧩 My Approach: Extract the last digit of x using % 10. Build the reversed number step by step using rev = rev * 10 + digit. Carefully check for overflow before multiplying or adding — using INT_MAX and INT_MIN limits to ensure the reversed number stays valid. If overflow is detected, return 0. 🔍 Key Learnings: How to handle integer overflow without using 64-bit variables. Importance of edge case testing and boundary conditions. Reinforced understanding of modulus (%) and integer division (/) operations. 🔥 Progress: Day 7 / 120 📚 Language: C 🏁 Problem Solved: Reverse Integer (LeetCode #7) Every problem is a small step toward stronger logic and cleaner code! 💪 #100DaysOfCode #120DaysOfCode #CodingChallenge #LeetCode #CProgramming #ProblemSolving #LearnEveryday #BuildInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🎯 LeetCode Daily – Combination Sum IV (Day 125) Today’s problem was a powerful exploration of Dynamic Programming with sequence-based combinations - Combination Sum IV. ✅ My Approach: 🔹 Problem – Combination Sum IV: • The goal was to find the number of possible ordered combinations that sum up to a given target using elements from an array. • Implemented Memoization (Top-Down DP) to recursively explore all ways to reach the target, caching results to prevent recomputation. • Then optimized with Tabulation (Bottom-Up DP), where each state dp[i] represents the number of combinations that sum to i. • For every value from 0 to target, iterated through all numbers and accumulated valid combinations. 🧠 Key Insight: Unlike the traditional Subset Sum or Coin Change problems, this problem treats order as significant, making it a classic case of permutation-based DP. The key is understanding how smaller sub-targets build up to form the total - a perfect demonstration of the power of recursive relationships. 📊 Time Complexity: O(N × Target) 📦 Space Complexity: O(Target) #LeetCode #DSA #DynamicProgramming #Combinatorics #ProblemSolving #DailyCoding #LearningInPublic #Day125
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Day 9 of #30DaysOfCode 📐 From Brute Force to Ultra-Optimized: Maximum Rectangle Area Problem Just cracked an interesting geometric problem that taught me the power of micro-optimizations in competitive programming! The Challenge: Find the largest axis-aligned rectangle from a set of points where no other points lie inside or on the borders. The Journey: Started with O(n⁴) brute force approach Optimized to O(n³) using diagonal-pair strategy Applied competitive programming micro-optimizations Key Optimizations That Made the Difference: - unordered_set with reserve() → 3-5x faster lookups vs set - Bit packing coordinates → (x,y) into single 64-bit integer for faster hashing - Const references → Reduced array access overhead - Early break/continue → Eliminated wasted iterations - Direct comparison → Avoided max() function overhead The Results: ⚡ 6-8x performance improvement 💾 Same O(n) space complexity 🎯 Runs in ~100-200 operations for n ≤ 10 Key Takeaway: For small constraints, the right data structure + micro-optimizations matter more than asymptotic complexity. Sometimes it's not about changing the algorithm, but making every operation count! #CompetitiveProgramming #CPP #AlgorithmOptimization #DSA #ProblemSolving #SoftwareEngineering #CodingInterview #PerformanceOptimization Educative #educative
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development