"The Gardener and the Machine", from Art Villanueva, DEng, ESEP, just come out.
TL;RD (in my words): complex systems are larger than anyone single comprehension. Design and upkeep approaches based on purely mechanistic paradigms (think quantitative, coherent logic models driven towards pure performance) will create brittleness which will fail upon the reality of continued deployment. A "gardener" mindset will led to better results, from design to operations, enabling evolvability, learning and adaption. The book advances with these ideas, while proposing a framework and tools for performing engineering from the gardening mindset perspective.
Art had the good grace to send me an Advanced Review Copy. The title and content strongly resonated: a change of mindset, approach and tools is needed if we claim to work with "complex" systems. The book is rich in showing that complexity appears in all layers of life and how a humble and gardening mindset is more robust towards success than a "mechanistic" approach, driven by maximizing for total performance. All starts maybe by understanding how to frame success: single point metrics or an understanding of availability, coherence, needed capability in time: the word #resilience thus comes to the eye many times, as #learning and #evolving. It is not wonder that among the examples we can go from the impact on ecosystems in Africa, to defense systems and child raising. Common themes thread throughout and it is helpful to exercise recognition of the same fundamentals working across.
Art was happy in weaving several fundamental ideas with practical tools, methods, and heuristics to approach complex systems design from an engineering perspective. He proposes a framework to articulate and support decision making from a "gardening" perspective. I think the book works both as an entry point, middjourney reflection, and reference to further explore, so we get better at designing and evolving systems that are in fact resilient OR, maybe more importantly, not rush to destroy what we don't understand.
Being a gardener is a mix of cultivation of permanent curiosity and the humility of aiming to see the whole without falling into the illusion of having achieved holistic understanding. The gardener tries to map and feel the topology and behavior, sense for the response, expect unknown stress, aim for resilience.
Engineering, I have come to believe, is a political act on the world. It constrains and amplifies us all. Like the adage of "you ship your org chart", I can provoke with "you ship the ethical fundalmentals from which you frame the world". So, I encourage anyone to pick the "The Gardener and the Machine" and engage around, at the work office or practice community to discuss. So there are more "gardening" around and less hubric britleness thrown around.
3