Sam McAfee

Building a startup is hard. It is especially hard in a country like Nigeria, where the ecosystem is yet to mature, and there are still many challenges to navigate. It is confusing, lonely, and full of uncertain decisions. Founders, especially early-stage founders, need as much support as they can get. Not “inspire to perspire” posts, but practical support on hiring, operations, funding, customer research, and navigating the regulatory landscape. Too many founders are surrounded by noise, surface-level advice, and generic content that does not reflect their current realities. What they need is a community that understands exactly what they are going through and can offer context that is immediately useful. Sierra Collective exists to be that community. A space where founders learn from one another’s live experiences and shorten the painful trial and error that usually defines the early stages of building. At Sierra, we believe that the most valuable support comes from those who are active in the trenches, navigating the same obstacles. If you are an early-stage founder, you should join the Sierra Collective. You do not have to figure everything out alone. As the African proverb says, “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” Join Sierra: https://lnkd.in/d-Nzmtkq

10

2 Comments

The org chart that helped you get to 10 partnerships starts working against you at 50. Unclear ownership, reporting lines that bury the function, specialists brought in too late. Scaling a partner program requires making structural decisions that reflect where you're going, not just where you've been. On Thursday, March 26, Nelson Wang (Partner Principles), Jessica Baker(AchieveUnite), and Eleanor Thompson (Gravitee) are joining Denise Duest, MBA of HubSpot to talk through the real decisions behind building a partner team that scales:   ➡️ When to hire generalists vs. specialists ➡️ How to structure around different partner motions and how that changes as you grow ➡️ What reporting lines signal about whether your organization actually values partners Join us for a candid conversation from people who've built partner teams from startup mode through enterprise scale. Register here to attend live or get the recording:  https://lnkd.in/eFSf_g8v

39

1 Comment

A week can look productive on the surface, yet still lack any real coherence. Constantly moving between maker/manager mode is exhausting, but more importantly, it breaks momentum. Since the start of the year, we stopped trying to patch around this problem and built something to solve it. If you're a technical founder who feels this problem firsthand, please reach out or sign up in the link below.

1

I recently talked to a founder who commented that they were terrified of "structure." That founder associated structure with endless meetings, rigid hierarchies, and the death of the startup agility. I explained to her that the lack of structure doesn't create speed, limit creativity, or impact agility. It creates fragility and risk. At scale, unclear ownership and weak systems introduce a "hidden friction" that slows execution far more than a thoughtful process ever would. In thinking about this even more, I would say that speed and safety aren’t opposites. They are actually partners that flourish when the other side does. This is structure. Lets take a look: Speed Without Safety (NOT STRUCTURED) ~Feels Chaotic / Anxious ~Outcome is fragile growth ~ Result is "everything seems to break at scale" ~ Risk is high (The "crash") Speed With Systems (STRUCTURE) ~ Feels Focused and Confident ~ Outcome is scalable velocity ~ Result is that friction disappears ~ Risk is calculated & managed The Shift: Old way: Move fast, break things, hope for the best. New way: Build the system, trust the system, accelerate with confidence. Founders: Don't fear clarity. It’s the highest-octane fuel you have. #StartupLife #Scaling #FounderMentalities

5

3 Comments

Founders: what if fundraising felt like product ops with an AI COO in your corner? On Opening Pathways, I sit down with Elisabeth Bykoff, founder of Boxsy, to unpack how she’s building a two-sided, AI-enabled fundraising platform that serves both founders and investors, and why “radical transparency” might be the unlock the venture ecosystem needs. Why this episode matters: From “ops in a box” to AI COO: Boxsy’s vision is an agentic COO for founders and an analyst for investors, speeding decisions on both sides. Validation before code: 6 months of user interviews and a lo-fi prototype beat guesswork. Hard truth on timing: Building too early can burn runway; today’s tools can compress product cycles. Pivot discipline: Follow gut + validation. Investor demand pulled Boxsy to ship the “other side” faster. Leadership in the chaos: Hire for ownership, set clear expectations, coach relentlessly, and protect downtime to stay in the game. Trust, but verify: Be generous with trust and layer in checkpoints. Making the hard calls: Write it down, pressure-test with mentors, then decide from a calm place. Impact beyond metrics: Redefine success as learning, joy, and raising founder win-rates. Elisabeth’s bold goal: lift Series A odds from ~1% to 10%. 🎧 Listen here: https://lnkd.in/gdyJTBCJ 👉 Question for you: What would an agentic COO handle first in your startup…fundraising ops, customer research, or GTM hygiene? #OpeningPathways #Podcast #Startups #Fundraising #VentureCapital #AI #AgenticAI #Leadership #Founders #ProductOps #Boxsy

16

2 Comments

We just published a simple, practical guide for Charitable Fundraising Platforms. It explains what a CFP is, why the rules are changing, and how to stay compliant in California + other states with emerging laws (like Hawaii). You’ll find clear guidance on written consent, nonprofit eligibility checks, payout timelines, disclosures, and reporting so teams can launch and scale with confidence. If you run round-ups, checkout donations, or a giving/crowdfunding platform, give it a read→ https://lnkd.in/eBmhBfbS

12

To be fair, sometimes it *is* the seed. Not all seeds are going to sprout, thrive, or survive to bear fruit. But you can't control the seed, you can only control the conditions. Sometimes seeds fail to thrive because they are in a poorly fitting environment, and sometimes the environment is just poor, and no one really thrives. Wow, you can ride that analogy all kinds of distance. A culture that is direct and kind can be a great asset to a business, but it does not guarantee success. If the culture does not serve the business and help ensure its survival, the culture is not achieving its most important job.

62

13 Comments

"I have too many meetings disrupting my ability to do deep focused work." I'm sure you've said that or people on your team have. What's the solution? Two approaches to this: 1.) Fewer meetings and disruptions 2.) A System for Deep Work in Shallow Containers Most people focus on #1. I'm a big believer in this, in fact Carbon Voice users reports a 60% reduction in the hours in meetings. That said, #1 can be impractical in many situations. So the best system is creating an efficient system assuming you have the constraint of smaller blocks of time (#2) and then use #1 to amplify the impact. What is the key to #2? I created (Thanks Google NotebookLM) a quick podcast style explanation of how to achieve that here: https://lnkd.in/ggvR8Cn5 Three basic concepts: - The need for long blocks of time (Deep Containers) is result of heavy ramp time. Solve this. - Break things into smaller chunks of execution - Use the smaller segments of time to plan or setup for faster execution of the container A key in all of this is to have quick ways to capture breadcrumbs and consume breadcrumbs to re-ramp. This is a great use of voice, where it's 4x faster to dump out. You can dump ideas while on a walk. You can listen to context while brushing your teeth in the morning to re-ramp. How do you manage the time slicing that life and work inevitably hand us?

4