Dimitra Havriluk

A more human, more strategic TA function? 74% of talent professionals are optimistic about AI’s impact on recruitment, according to LinkedIn data. Exceptional TA professionals aren't replaced by AI; they're supercharged by it. In this blog, we share insights on: - AI literacy as a strategic skill - The AI Maturity Curve - Emerging skills for AI-enabled TA professionals - Actions talent leader should be taking - Procurement with purpose - Responsible AI: From Ethics to Governance Don’t miss these expert insights: https://lnkd.in/dKqz-gXM #Hiring #Recruitment #TalentAcquisition #Leadership #ArtificiaIIntelligence #Technology

2

Tech stacks are shrinking. Budgets are tightening. Craig Fisher explains why platforms that *actually* simplify recruiting are leading the way, and why hireEZ keeps making his shortlist. Even when he’s not in the weeds, hireEZ helps him solve real recruiting problems. Listen to the full podcast: https://hubs.ly/Q03BPVFz0 Then see us in action: https://hubs.ly/Q03BPTS-0

4

AI is becoming a bigger part of everyday recruiting work. That shift is putting more weight on relationships. As automation embeds deeper into workflows, trust shows up everywhere it matters. 🌟 Between leaders + teams. 🌟 Recruiters + candidates. 🌟 Clients, partners, + the platforms they rely on. On the Full Desk Experience, Kortney Harmon shares a grounded perspective: trust has to come first. Before new systems scale. Before adoption sticks. Before growth holds. This episode explores how recruiting organizations intentionally build trust while technology accelerates. 🎧 Full episode, "Eight Signals Redefining Recruiting Leadership in 2026" in the comments.⤵️ Where does trust matter most inside your firm right now? #FullDeskExperience #FDE

4

1 Comment

The top 10 Talent Acquisition plays of 2025 (based on conversations with 75 leading TA operators) Most of the gains this year didn’t come from shiny new tools. They came from executing fundamentals with real rigor. Here’s what moved the needle 👇 1. Persona-based candidate messaging Teams that interviewed real employees and built messaging around actual motivations consistently outperformed generic outreach. 2. Email sequencing (done properly) Not “send one nice message and hope.” Structured, multi-touch sequences that compound over time. 3. Firmographic market mapping Using tools like Dealroom or Crunchbase to understand who you’re really hiring from before sourcing even starts. 4. Centralised messaging + A/B testing High-performing team leads provided frameworks, tested messages, and scaled what worked. 5. Recruiter battle cards Prepared responses for common objections, grounded in real value propositions. 6. Candidate experience as a competitive advantage Forward-looking, thoughtful feedback that creates goodwill, even for candidates you reject. 7. AI as a multiplier, not a role replacer AI taking admin, triage, and prep work, recruiters focusing on judgment and relationships. 8. Systemised AI use across teams Not “everyone experimenting in isolation,” but shared workflows, prompts, and standards. 9. Sourcing as a strategic intelligence function. Top teams treat sourcing as a way to gather market data, signal shifts, and inform strategy. 10. Hiring like a GTM motion Clear ICPs. Tiered effort. Measurable funnels. TA borrowing discipline from sales and marketing. The pattern? Nothing here is magic. It’s about systems, clarity, and execution quality. 2026 won’t reward teams that do more. It’ll reward teams that do the right things, consistently. Which ones have you experimented with?

150

9 Comments

🏎️ When recruiters shift from agency to corporate, the biggest change isn’t the tech, the titles, or the org charts — it’s the rhythm. Agency recruiting thrives on velocity. The work is fast, dynamic, and fueled by constant movement. You’re supporting multiple clients, responding quickly, and operating in an environment where momentum is everything. Corporate recruiting moves with a different kind of energy. Stakeholders are balancing broader priorities, collaborating across teams, and aligning on long‑term goals. Approvals involve more voices. Scheduling requires coordination across calendars. The pace reflects the complexity of the organization. Both environments demand skill, partnership, and adaptability — they just operate on distinct tempos. #CorporateRecruiting #RecruitingStrategies

1