KYC, AML, audit trails. They land in the backlog looking like features. In most fintech builds, that's where they stay until something forces the question. And when compliance finally arrives, it's rarely as a checklist item. It's as an architectural constraint that was never factored into the design. The answer isn't adding a sprint. It's rebuilding the data model. The cost of discovering compliance late isn't the delay. It's every decision that was already made assuming it didn't exist yet. How early does compliance thinking enter your build process?
Kreitech
Software Development
Austin, Texas 2,703 followers
Engineering partner for fintech scaleups and mature fintech teams.
About us
Kreitech works with fintech scaleups and mature fintech teams building in regulated, high-availability environments. Our focus is delivery continuity: extending engineering capacity, reducing friction in known risk areas, and building the foundations that make complex systems easier to change over time. We operate where the cost of a wrong decision is real: payment processors, lending platforms, neobanks, BaaS infrastructure, compliance and fraud systems. Environments where security, auditability, and uptime aren't requirements to work around, they're inputs to every technical decision. Over 10 years building software across complex, production-critical environments. Now focused entirely on fintech.
- Website
-
https://www.kreitech.io/
External link for Kreitech
- Industry
- Software Development
- Company size
- 11-50 employees
- Headquarters
- Austin, Texas
- Type
- Privately Held
- Founded
- 2013
- Specialties
- Software Development, Agile Methodologies, Fintech, Fintech Software, Financial Services, Payments, Regulatory Compliance, Banking, Cybersecurity, Cloud Computing, DevOps, API integration, Enterprise software, Legacy Modernization, and Software Engineering
Locations
-
Primary
Get directions
701 Brazos St
Austin, Texas 78701, US
-
Get directions
1384 Obligado
Kreitech
Montevideo, 11300, UY
Employees at Kreitech
Updates
-
The UI is the contract. Not a metaphor, literally. In lending and payments, a button that doesn't render, a disclosure that gets clipped, a consent flow that breaks on one device: those aren't bugs to patch in the next sprint. They're regulatory findings. The fine doesn't care about the Figma file. Most engineering teams aren't set up to evaluate the legal weight of a frontend decision. Not because they're careless, because nobody owns that intersection. Where does that review happen in your team?
-
Most fintech AI projects don't fail because the model was wrong. They fail because nobody built what goes around it. No monitoring. No explainability layer. No documented decision trail for the auditor. The model works fine in staging. Production is a different environment. What does your team's production AI stack look like beyond the model itself?
-
Our team is on the ground this week meeting fintech engineering leaders across Boston and Arlington. Every conversation is different in the details, but one theme keeps coming up: what AI actually changes about how you build and staff a fintech team, and what it doesn't. There's no clear answer yet. And honestly, we're not sure there's one correct answer either. Every team we meet sees it differently, and that's starting to feel like the point. If you're in either city and want to compare notes, Rafael Sisto Brida is around all week.
-
-
"We can't touch that" is one of the most expensive phrases in fintech engineering. We hear it often when we join a new team. It rarely means the system is untouchable. It usually means nobody has built enough confidence in the system, in the process, or in the team to move safely. Part of what we do is build that confidence. Not by replacing what works, but by understanding it well enough to change what doesn't. What's the system your team works around instead of in?
-
-
We're starting to see a pattern in fintech teams building AI. The pilot works. The model performs. Then it hits the reality of a regulated production environment: deployment pipelines, monitoring, explainability requirements, audit trails. And it stalls. The gap isn't the model. It's the operational infrastructure around it. That's where we spend most of our time when we work with these teams. Where does AI actually stall in your environment: the model, or everything around it?
-
-
👀 The first thing we do when we join a fintech team isn't review the code. It's mapping what lives in people's heads that isn't written anywhere. Why that integration exists. What that workaround is protecting. Who made a call three years ago that nobody questioned since. 🧠 That knowledge doesn't show up in a repo. It shows up when something breaks at 2am and someone knows exactly where to look. What's the system your team understands better than it's documented?
-
-
✈️ We're taking some meetings on the road! Rafael Sisto Brida, our CEO, will be in Arlington and Boston Next Week. We've been deepening our focus on fintech over the last few years, and there's no better way to understand a market than talking to the people building inside it. 🤝 If you're part of the local fintech scene, we'd love to connect. Compare notes and talk about what's changing. Drop a comment or send us a message if you're around.